American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 34, Issue 2 , Pages 164-170, February 2008

Screening for Prostate Cancer in U.S. Men:

ACPM Position Statement on Preventive Practice

  • Lionel S. Lim, MD, MPH, FACP

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Internal and Preventive Medicine, Griffin Hospital, Derby, Connecticut
  • ,
  • Kevin Sherin, MD, MPH, FACPM

      Affiliations

    • Department of Family Medicine and Rural Health, Florida State University College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: American College of Preventive Medicine, Attn: Michele Surricchio, MPH, CHES, 1307 New York Ave NW, Suite 200, Washington DC 20005.
  • ,
  • ACPM Prevention Practice Committee

Introduction

Prostate cancer is the leading cancer in U.S. men, and the third leading cause of cancer deaths. Principal screening tests for detection of asymptomatic prostate cancer include digital rectal examination (DRE) and measurement of the serum tumor marker, prostate-specific antigen (PSA). There are risks and benefits associated with prostate cancer screening. Randomized controlled trials of screening by DRE and PSA are limited to two previously published studies. Two other large-scale randomized controlled trials are currently in progress.

Methods

This study reviewed the efficacy of DRE and PSA for prostate cancer screening found in the medical literature prior to July 2007.

Results

Applications of PSA screening tests used in clinical practice include (1) a PSA cutoff of 4 ng/ml, (2) age-specific PSA, (3) PSA velocity, (4) PSA density, and (5) percent free PSA. Prostate cancer screening can detect early disease and offers the potential to decrease morbidity and mortality. Prostate cancer screening benefits, however, remain unproven, pending results of ongoing trials. There is currently no convincing evidence that early screening, detection, and treatment improves mortality. Limitations of prostate cancer screening include potential adverse health effects associated with false-positive and negative results, and treatment side effects.

Conclusions

The American College of Preventive Medicine concludes that there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine population screening with DRE or PSA. Clinicians caring for men, especially African-American men and those with positive family histories, should provide information about potential benefits and risks of prostate cancer screening, and the limitations of current evidence for screening, in order to maximize informed decision making.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The members of ACPM’s Prevention Practice Committee are: Gershon H. Bergeisen, MD, MPH; Michael T. Compton, MD, MPH; V. James Guillory, DO, MPH, FACPM (Chair); Doug I. Hammer, MD, MPH, DrPH; Joylene John-Sowah, MD, MPH; Steven Jonas, MD, MPH (Consultant); Elizabeth Kann, MD, MPH; Ronit B. Katz, MD, FACPM; Robin McFee, DO, MPH, FACPM; Elaine S. Perry, MD, MS; Jennifer E. Rogers, MPH (Staff); and Michele A. Surricchio, MPH, CHES (Staff).

PII: S0749-3797(07)00687-3

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.10.003

Refers to erratum:

  • Erratum

    American Journal of Preventive Medicine May 2008 (Vol. 34, Issue 5, Page 454)

American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 34, Issue 2 , Pages 164-170, February 2008