American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 27, Issue 3, Supplement , Pages 163-171, October 2004

Pros and cons of proposed interventions to promote healthy eating

  • Eric Finkelstein, PhD, MHA

      Affiliations

    • Health, Social and Economics Research, RTI International (Finkelstein), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
    • Partnership to Promote Healthy Eating and Active Living, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Eric Finkelstein, PhD, MHA, Research Economist; Health, Social and Economics Research, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Hobbs Building, Research Triangle Park NC 27709-2194. Address reprint requests to: Laura Simonds, The Partnership to Promote Healthy Eating and Active Living, 44 School Street, Suite 325, Boston MA 02108
  • ,
  • Simone French, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Minnesota (French), Minneapolis, Minnesota
    • Partnership to Promote Healthy Eating and Active Living, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Jayachandran N. Variyam, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (Variyam), Washington, DC
    • Partnership to Promote Healthy Eating and Active Living, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Pamela S. Haines, DrPH, RD

      Affiliations

    • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Haines), Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    • Partnership to Promote Healthy Eating and Active Living, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

The increased prevalence and costs associated with the obesity epidemic have made preventive efforts a public health priority. Public health has historically relied on a series of targeted regulations, taxes, and education efforts to curb epidemics, and will rely on similar strategies to combat obesity. We argue that interventions targeted at youth are relatively easy to justify on economic grounds due to the additional protections that this group requires, but that justification for government interventions aimed at curbing obesity among adults requires additional evidence that private markets are not functioning properly. We then present seven proposed intervention strategies to promote healthy eating, and use an economic framework to discuss the relative merits of the interventions. This evaluation will allow policymakers to make more informed decisions concerning the relative merits of these strategies in combating the obesity epidemic.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0749-3797(04)00172-2

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.06.017

American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 27, Issue 3, Supplement , Pages 163-171, October 2004