« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 31, Issue 5
, Pages 391-398
, November 2006
Patient Understanding of Food Labels: The Role of Literacy and Numeracy
References
- . Detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III), September 1, 2002. Bethesda MD: National Institute of Health; 2002;
- American Heart Association. An eating plan for healthy Americans. Available at: www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=1088.
- . Dr. Atkins’ new diet revolution. New York: Avon Books; 2002;
- . A week in the zone. New York: Harper Collins; 2000;
- . Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labeling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2005;8:21–28
- . Food labeling: prominence of calories. 2005;Docket No. 2004N-0463, April 1, 21 CFR Part 101. Available at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/DOCKETS/04n0463/04n0463.htm.
- Food and Drug Administration. Food labeling: serving sizes of products that can reasonably be consumed at one eating occasion. Docket No. 2004N-0456, April 2005, 21 CFR Part 101. Available at http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/dockets/04n0456/04n0456.htm
- . Report of the Obesity Working Group: calories count, March 12. 2004;Available at: www.cfsan.fda.gov/∼dms/owg-toc.html.
- . Dietary reference intakes: guiding principles for nutrition labeling and fortification. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2003;
- . Consumers’ ability to perform tasks using nutrition labels. J Nutr Educ. 1998;30:210–217
- . How well do consumers understand percentage daily value on food labels?. Am J Health Promotion. 2000;14:157–160
- . Knowledge and use of the food label among senior women in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Nutr Health Aging. 1999;3:152–157
- . Knowledge and misconceptions about the food label among women with non—insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Educ. 1997;23:425–432
- . Nutrition labels in bar graph format deemed most useful for consumer purchase decisions using adaptive conjoint analysis. J Am Diet Assoc. 1991;91:800–807
- . Health literacy: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. JAMA. 1999;281:552–557
- . Adult literacy in America (NCES 1993–275). Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education; 2002;
- . Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Washington DC: the National Academies Press; 2004;
- . FDA asking for public comment on food label changes. 2005;April. Available at: www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2005/NEW01170.html.
- Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients. Fam Med. 1991;23:433–435
- Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med. 1993;25:391–395
- . WRAT-33: Wide Range Achievement Test administration manual. Wilmington DC: Wide Range Inc; 1993;
- Food and Drug Administration. Food label education tools and general information. Washington DC. Available at: www.cfsan.fda.gov/∼dms/lab-gen.html.
- . Scale development: theory and applications. Newbury Park CA: Sage; 1991;
- . Regression modeling strategies. New York: Springer; 2001;
- . Trends in food label use associated with new nutrition labeling regulations. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1212–1215
- . Another look at the impact of reference information on consumer impressions of nutrition information. J Public Policy Mark. 1996;15:55–62
- . The impact of a nutriton information program on food purchases. J Public Policy Mark. 1985;4:1–13
- . More effective nutrition label formats are not necessarily preferred. J Am Diet Assoc. 1992;92:1230–1234
- . Performance characteristics of seven nutrition label formats. J Public Policy Mark. 1996;15:1–15
- . Can the educationally disadvantaged interpret the FDA-mandated nutrition facts panel in the presence of an implied health claim?. J Public Policy Mark. 1999;18:106–117
- . The impact of health claims on consumer search and product evaluation outcomes: results from FDA experimental data. J Public Policy Mark. 1999;18:89–105
- . Literacy and health outcomes (A systematic review of the literature). J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:1228–1239
- . Weakness in numbers: the challenge of numeracy in health care. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:1071–1072
- . A definition and operational framework for health numeracy. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29:375–376
- . Lowering the silent barriers to compliance for patients with low literacy skills. Promotion Health. 1987;8:6–8
- . Improving comprehension for cancer patients with low literacy skills: strategies for clinicians. CA Cancer J Clin. 1998;48:151–162
- Communicating with patients who have limited literacy skills: report of the National Work Group on Literacy and Health. J Fam Pract. 1998;46:168–176
- www.pfizerhealthliteracy.com/improving.html.
- . The relationship between literacy and glycemic control in a diabetes disease-management program. Diabetes Educ. 2004;30:263–273
- Influence of patient literacy on the effectiveness of a primary care—based diabetes disease management program. JAMA. 2004;292:1711–1716
- . Interventions to improve health outcomes for patients with low literacy (A systematic review). J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:185–192
- . Strategies to improve cancer education materials. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996;23:1305–1312
- Closing the loop: physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:83–90
This project received support from the Vanderbilt Diabetes Research and Training Center (P60 DK020593-28). RLR currently receives funding support to perform research on the role of literacy and numeracy in diabetes from an NIH Career Award (K23 DK065294), the American Diabetes Association (Novo Nordisk Clinical Research Award), and the Pfizer Clear Health Communication Initiative.No financial conflict of interest was reported by the authors of this paper.
PII: S0749-3797(06)00281-9
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.025
© 2006 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 31, Issue 5
, Pages 391-398
, November 2006
