American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 32, Issue 3 , Pages 231-238, March 2007

Computer-Based Brief Intervention:

A Randomized Trial with Postpartum Women

  • Steven J. Ondersma, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Steven J. Ondersma, PhD, Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, 2761 E. Jefferson Ave., Detroit MI 48207.
  • ,
  • Dace S. Svikis, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
  • ,
  • Charles R. Schuster, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan

published online 22 January 2007.

Background

Drug use among parenting women is a significant risk factor for a range of negative child outcomes, including exposure to violence, child maltreatment, and child behavior problems. Implementation of brief interventions with this population may be greatly facilitated by computer-based interventions.

Design

Randomized clinical trial with 4-month follow-up.

Setting/participants

Participants were 107 postpartum women recruited from an urban obstetric hospital primarily serving a low-income population. Women were randomized into assessment only versus assessment plus brief intervention conditions; 76 (71%) returned for follow-up evaluation.

Intervention

A 20-minute, single-session, computer-based motivational intervention (based on motivational interviewing methods), combined with two nontailored mailings and voucher-based reinforcement of attendance at an initial intake/treatment session.

Main outcome measures

Illicit drug use as measured by qualitative urinalysis and self-report.

Results

Frequency of illicit drug use other than marijuana increased slightly for the control group, but declined among intervention group participants (p<0.05, between-group Mann–Whitney U; d=0.50); the magnitude of intervention effects on changes in marijuana use frequency was similar, but did not reach statistical significance. Point-prevalence analysis at follow-up did not show significant group differences in drug use. However, trends under a range of assumptions regarding participants lost to follow-up all favored the intervention group, with most effect sizes in the moderate range (odds ratios 1.4 to 4.7).

Conclusions

Results tentatively support the efficacy of this high-reach, replicable brief intervention. Further research should seek to replicate these findings and to further develop the computer as a platform for validated brief interventions.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0749-3797(06)00494-6

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2006.11.003

Refers to erratum:

  • Erratum

    American Journal of Preventive Medicine June 2007 (Vol. 32, Issue 6, Page 549)

American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 32, Issue 3 , Pages 231-238, March 2007