American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 32, Issue 5 , Pages 403-407.e17 , May 2007

Aspirin Use Among Adults Aged 40 and Older in the United States: Results of a National Survey

  • Michael Pignone, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • General Internal Medicine Division, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
  • ,
  • George K. Anderson, MD, MPH, FACPM

      Affiliations

    • Association of Military Surgeons of the United States, Bethesda, Maryland
  • ,
  • Katherine Binns, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Harris Interactive Inc., Rochester, New York
  • ,
  • Hugh H. Tilson, MD, DrPH

      Affiliations

    • Office of the Dean, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Steven M. Weisman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Innovative Science Solutions, Morristown, New Jersey
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Steven M. Weisman, PhD, 67 Park Place East, Morristown NJ 07960.

References 

  1. Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ. 2002;324:71–86
  2. Hayden M, Pignone M, Phillips C, Mulrow C. Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:161–172
  3. Persell SD, Baker DW. Aspirin use among adults with diabetes: recent trends and emerging sex disparities. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2492–2499
  4. Kim C, Beckles GL. Cardiovascular disease risk reduction in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:1–7
  5. Ajani UA, Ford ES, Greenland KJ, Giles WH, Mokdad AH. Aspirin use among U.S. adults: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30:74–77
  6. Deming WE. Statistical adjustment of data. New York: Wiley; 1943;
  7. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55
  8. Berrens R, Bohara A, Jenkins-Smith H, Silva C, Weimer D. The advent of Internet surveys for political research: a comparison of telephone and Internet samples. Political Anal. 2003;11:1–23
  9. Taylor H, Bremer J, Overmeyer C, Siegel JW, Terhanian G. The record of internet-based opinion polls in predicting the results of 72 races in the November 2000 U.S. elections. Int J Market Res. 2001;43:58–63
  10. Stafford R, Radley DC. The underutilization of cardiac medications of proven benefit, 1990 to 2002. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:56–61
  11. Pignone M, Sheridan SL, Lee YZ, et al. Heart to Heart: a computerized decision aid for assessment of coronary heart disease risk and the impact of risk-reduction interventions for primary prevention. Prev Cardiol. 2004;7:26–33

PII: S0749-3797(07)00018-9

doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.010

American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 32, Issue 5 , Pages 403-407.e17 , May 2007