« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 33, Issue 5
, Pages 428-434.e11
, November 2007
Trials of Decision Aids for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
References
- American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2002. Atlanta, Georgia 2002 Available online at: www.cancer.org.
- . Screening for prostate cancer: an update of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:917–929
- . Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) best practice policy. Oncology (Williston Park). 2000;14:267–272277–8, 280 passim
- Screening for prostate cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:915–916
- . Summary of policy recommendations for periodic health examinations, revision 5.4. Leawood KS: American Academy of Family Physicians; 2003;
- Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:67–80
- . Screening for prostate cancer in American men. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15:81–84
- . American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:31–44
- . Health decision aids to facilitate shared decision making in office practice. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:127–135
- Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;3:CD001431
- . Integrated decision making: definitions for a new discipline. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50:265–268
- Reduction in uptake of PSA tests following decision aids: systematic review of current aids and their evaluations. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;58:13–26
- Impact of cancer-related decision aids. evidence report/technology assessment Number 46. AHRQ Publication No. 02-E004 Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2002;July
- Methods for conducting systematic reviews of the evidence of effectiveness and economic efficiency of interventions to reduce injuries to motor vehicle occupants. Am J Prev Med. 2001;21(4S):23–30
- . The evaluation of two methods to facilitate shared decision making for men considering the prostate-specific antigen test. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:391–398
- Randomized trial examining the effect of two prostate cancer screening educational interventions on patient knowledge, preferences, and behaviors. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:835–842
- . A randomized controlled trial comparing Internet and video to facilitate patient education for men considering the prostate specific antigen test. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:781–787
- Educating African American men about the prostate cancer screening dilemma: a randomized intervention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:2179–2188
- . Information needs of men regarding prostate cancer screening and the effect of a brief decision aid. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;54:345–351
- . Enhanced decision-making: the use of a videotape decision-aid for patients with prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;30:119–127
- . A frequently used patient and physician-directed educational intervention does nothing to improve primary care of prostate conditions. Urology. 2001;58:875–881
- . The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer (Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team). J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:342–349
- . A randomized controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:333–340
- . Patient education for informed decision making about prostate cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1:22–28
- . Does evidence-based information about screening for prostate cancer enhance consumer decision-making? (A randomised controlled trial). J Med Screen. 2003;10:27–39
- Preparing African-American men in community primary care practices to decide whether or not to have prostate cancer screening. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97:1143–1154
- Informed decision making and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a brief patient decision aid on men’s knowledge, attitudes and intention to be tested. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63:367–379
- . The impact of shared decision-making in prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening. Med Decis Making. 1996;19:525
- . The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screening. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1333–1336
- . A community-based randomised controlled trial of three different educational resources for men about prostate cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:168–182
- Adherence by African American men to prostate cancer education and early detection. Cancer. 1999;86:88–104
- . Efficacy of a video for teaching patients about prostate cancer screening and treatment. Am J Health Promot. 2004;18:292–295
- . The effect of an illustrated pamphlet decision-aid on the use of prostate cancer screening tests. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:418–424
- . Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;37:255–263
- . Educating men about prostate cancer screening (A randomized trial of a mailed pamphlet). Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4:112–120
- Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making. The PSA decision: what YOU need to know. Developed by the Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making and Distributed by Health Dialog, Inc. Available online at: www.healthdialog.com.
- . Screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test: are patients making informed decisions?. J Fam Pract. 1999;48:682–688
- Measuring patient knowledge of the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;54:143–152
- . Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:25–30
- . The control preferences scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997;29:21–43
- Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale. Med Decis Making. 1996;16:58–64
- . Satisfaction with health care of hemodialysis patients. Res Nurs Health. 1987;10:367–374
- . State–Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults Form Y: Review Set Manual, Test, Scoring Key. Redwood City CA: Mind Garden, Inc; 1983;
- . To screen or not to screen, when clinical guidelines disagree: primary care physicians’ use of the PSA test. Prev Med. 2004;38:182–191
- . The prevalence of limited health literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:175–184
- . Interventions to improve health outcomes for patients with low literacy (A systematic review). J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:185–192
- . Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA. 2004;291:71–78
- . Why is prostate cancer screening so common when the evidence is so uncertain? (A system without negative feedback). Am J Med. 2002;113:663–667
- . A new model of medical decisions: exploring the limits of shared decision making. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:275–280
PII: S0749-3797(07)00497-7
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.030
© 2007 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 33, Issue 5
, Pages 428-434.e11
, November 2007
