American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 42, Issue 2 , Pages 129-135, February 2012

School and Residential Neighborhood Food Environment and Diet Among California Youth

  • Ruopeng An, MPP, MPhil

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Ruopeng An, MPP, MPhil, Pardee RAND Graduate School, 1776 Main Street, P.O. BOX 2138, Santa Monica CA 90407-2138
  • ,
  • Roland Sturm, PhD

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California

Background

Various hypotheses link neighborhood food environments and diet. Greater exposure to fast-food restaurants and convenience stores is thought to encourage overconsumption; supermarkets and large grocery stores are claimed to encourage healthier diets. For youth, empirical evidence for any particular hypothesis remains limited.

Purpose

This study examines the relationship between school and residential neighborhood food environment and diet among youth in California.

Methods

Data from 8226 children (aged 5–11 years) and 5236 adolescents (aged 12–17 years) from the 2005 and 2007 California Health Interview Survey were analyzed in 2011. The dependent variables are daily servings of fruits, vegetables, juice, milk, soda, high-sugar foods, and fast food, which were regressed on measures of food environments. Food environments were measured by counts and density of businesses, distinguishing fast-food restaurants, convenience stores, small food stores, grocery stores, and large supermarkets within a specific distance (varying from 0.1 to 1.5 miles) from a respondent's home or school.

Results

No robust relationship between food environment and consumption is found. A few significant results are sensitive to small modeling changes and more likely to reflect chance than true relationships.

Conclusions

This correlational study has measurement and design limitations. Longitudinal studies that can assess links between environmental, dependent, and intervening food purchase and consumption variables are needed. Reporting a full range of studies, methods, and results is important as a premature focus on correlations may lead policy astray.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0749-3797(11)00849-X

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.012

American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 42, Issue 2 , Pages 129-135, February 2012