Increasing Water Availability During Afterschool Snack

Evidence, Strategies, and Partnerships from a Group Randomized Trial


      Providing drinking water to U.S. children during school meals is a recommended health promotion strategy and part of national nutrition policy. Urban school systems have struggled with providing drinking water to children, and little is known about how to ensure that water is served, particularly in afterschool settings.


      To assess the effectiveness of an intervention designed to promote water as the beverage of choice in afterschool programs.


      The Out of School Nutrition and Physical Activity Initiative (OSNAP) used a community-based collaboration and low-cost strategies to provide water after school. A group RCT was used to evaluate the intervention. Data were collected in 2010–2011 and analyzed in 2011.


      Twenty afterschool programs in Boston were randomized to intervention or control (delayed intervention).


      Intervention sites participated in learning collaboratives focused on policy and environmental changes to increase healthy eating, drinking, and physical activity opportunities during afterschool time (materials available at Collaboration between Boston Public Schools Food and Nutrition Services, afterschool staff, and researchers established water-delivery systems to ensure children were served water during snack time.

      Main outcome measures

      Average ounces of water served to children per day was recorded by direct observation at each program at baseline and 6-month follow-up over 5 consecutive school days. Secondary measures directly observed included ounces of other beverages served, other snack components, and water-delivery system.


      Participation in the intervention was associated with an increased average volume of water served (+3.6 ounces/day; p=0.01) during snack. On average, the intervention led to a daily decrease of 60.9 kcals from beverages served during snack (p=0.03).


      This study indicates the OSNAP intervention, including strategies to overcome structural barriers and collaboration with key actors, can increase offerings of water during afterschool snack. OSNAP appears to be an effective strategy to provide water in afterschool settings that can be helpful in implementing new U.S. Department of Agriculture guidelines regarding water availability during lunch and afterschool snack.

      Trial registration

      This study is registered at NCT01396473.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Ogden C.L.
        • Carroll M.D.
        • Flegal K.M.
        High body mass index for age among U.S. children and adolescents, 2003–2006.
        JAMA. 2008; 299: 2401-2405
        • Wang Y.C.
        • Bleich S.N.
        • Gortmaker S.L.
        Increasing caloric contribution from sugar-sweetened beverages and 100% fruit juices among U.S. children and adolescents, 1988–2004.
        Pediatrics. 2008; 121: 1604-1614
        • Ludwig D.S.
        • Peterson K.E.
        • Gortmaker S.L.
        Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective, observational analysis.
        Lancet. 2001; 357: 505-508
        • Vartanian L.R.
        • Schwartz M.B.
        • Brownell K.D.
        Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Public Health. 2007; 97: 667-675
        • Malik V.S.
        • Schulze M.B.
        • Hu F.B.
        Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 84: 274-288
        • Wang Y.C.
        • Ludwig D.S.
        • Sonneville K.
        • Gortmaker S.L.
        Impact of change in sweetened caloric beverage consumption on energy intake among children and adolescents.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009; 163: 336-343
        • Muckelbauer R.
        • Libuda L.
        • Clausen K.
        • Toschke A.M.
        • Reinehr T.
        • Kersting M.
        Promotion and provision of drinking water in schools for overweight prevention: randomized, controlled cluster trial.
        Pediatrics. 2009; 123: e661-e667
        • Kant A.K.
        • Graubard B.I.
        Contributors of water intake in U.S. children and adolescents: associations with dietary and meal characteristics—National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005–2006.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2010; 92: 887-896
        • Panel on Dietary Reference Intakes for Electrolytes and Water, Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes
        Dietary reference intakes for water, potassium, sodium, chloride, and sulfate.
        National Academies Press, Washington DC2005
        • Popkin B.M.
        • D'Anci K.E.
        • Rosenberg I.H.
        Water, hydration and health.
        Nutr Rev. 2010; 68: 439-458
        • Patel A.I.
        • Bogart L.M.
        • Elliott M.N.
        • et al.
        Increasing the availability and consumption of drinking water in middle schools: a pilot study.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2011; 8: A60
        • Siega-Riz A.M.
        • El Ghormli L.
        • Mobley C.
        • et al.
        • HEALTHY Study Group
        The effects of the HEALTHY Study intervention on middle school student dietary intakes.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8: 7
        • Cradock A.L.
        • McHugh A.
        • Mont-Ferguson H.
        • et al.
        Effect of school district policy change on consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages among high school students, Boston, Massachusetts, 2004-2006.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2011; 8: A74
        • Patel A.I.
        • Hampton K.E.
        Encouraging consumption of water in school and child care settings: access, challenges, and strategies for improvement.
        Am J Public Health. 2011; 101: 1370-1379
        • Afterschool Alliance
        America after 3 pm.
        • The Boston Indicators Project
        4.10.1 Children and youth participation in after-school programs, Boston neighborhood vs. comparable cities.
        • Food Research & Action Center
        Afterschool guide.
        • Beets M.W.
        • Beighle A.
        • Erwin H.E.
        • Huberty J.L.
        Impact of after-school programs to increase physical activity—a meta-analysis.
        Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36: 527-537
        • Economos C.D.
        • Hyatt R.R.
        • Goldberg J.P.
        • et al.
        A community intervention reduces BMI z-score in children: Shape Up Somerville first year results.
        Obesity. 2007; 15: 1325-1336
        • Dzewaltowski D.A.
        • Rosenkranz R.R.
        • Geller K.S.
        • et al.
        HOP'N after-school project: an obesity prevention randomized controlled trial.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7: 90
        • Mozaffarian R.S.
        • Wiecha J.L.
        • Roth B.A.
        • Nelston T.F.
        • Lee R.M.
        • Gortmaker S.L.
        Impact of an organizational intervention designed to improve snack and beverage quality in YMCA after-school programs.
        Am J Public Health. 2010; 100: 925-932
        • Stokols D.
        • Allen J.
        • Bellingham R.L.
        The social ecology of health promotion: implications for research and practice.
        Am J Health Promot. 1996; 10: 247-251
        • Israel B.A.
        • Schulz A.J.
        • Parker E.A.
        • Becker A.B.
        Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 1998; 19: 173-202
        • Gortmaker S.L.
        • Lee R.M.
        • Mozaffarian R.S.
        • et al.
        Impact of an after-school intervention on increases in children's physical activity.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44: 450-457
        • Kilo C.M.
        A framework for collaborative improvement: lessons from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Breakthrough Series.
        Qual Manag Health Care. 1998; 6: 1-13
        • Wagner E.H.
        • Austin B.T.
        • Davis C.
        • Hindmarsh M.
        • Schaefer J.
        • Bonomi A.
        Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action.
        Health Aff. 2001; 20: 64-78
        • Gebhardt S.E.
        • Pehrsson P.R.
        • Cutrufelli R.L.
        • et al.
        2007. USDA national nutrient database for standard reference, release 20.
        U.S. Dept of Agriculture, Washington DC2007
        • Williamson D.A.
        • Allen H.R.
        • Martin P.D.
        • Alfonso A.J.
        • Gerald B.
        • Hunt A.
        Comparison of digital photography to weighed and visual estimation of portion sizes.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2003; 103: 1139-1145
        • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
        Memo SP 28-2011 revised.
        • Mozaffarian R.S.
        • Andry A.
        • Lee R.M.
        • Wiecha J.L.
        • Gortmaker S.L.
        Price and healthfulness of snacks in 32 YMCA after-school programs in 4 U.S. metropolitan areas, 2006–2008.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2012; 9: E38
        • Cradock A.L.
        • Wilking C.L.
        • Olliges S.A.
        • Gortmaker S.L.
        Getting back on tap: the policy context and cost of ensuring access to low-cost drinking water in Massachusetts schools.
        Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43: S95-S101