Preventing Texting While Driving

A Statement of the American College of Preventive Medicine
Published:September 10, 2014DOI:
      The American College of Preventive Medicine (ACPM) is providing a set of recommendations designed to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with distractions due to texting while driving. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 12% of all fatal crashes involving at least one distracted driver are estimated to be related to cell phone use while driving.

      National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic safety facts research note: distracted driving 2011. USDOT. 2013.

      Given the combination of visual, manual, and cognitive distractions posed by texting, this is an issue of major public health concern for communities. Therefore, the ACPM feels it is timely to discuss this issue and provide the following recommendations:
      • 1
        Encourage state legislatures to develop and pass legislation banning texting while driving, while simultaneously implementing comprehensive and dedicated law enforcement strategies including penalties for these violations. Legislatures should establish a public awareness campaign regarding the dangers of texting while driving as an integral part of this legislation.
      • 2
        Promote further research into the design and evaluation of educational tools regarding texting while driving that can be incorporated into the issuance of driver’s licenses.
      • 3
        Provide primary care providers with the appropriate tools to educate patients of all ages.
      • 4
        Conduct additional studies investigating the risks associated with cell phone usage while driving, particularly texting, with motor vehicle crashes.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic safety facts research note: distracted driving 2011. USDOT. 2013.

      2. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. What is distracted driving? USDOT. 2013.

      3. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Distracted driving. CDC. 2013.

        • Drews F.A.
        • Yazdani H.
        • Godfrey C.N.
        • Cooper J.M.
        • Strayer D.L.
        Text messaging during simulated driving.
        Hum Factors. 2009; 51: 762-770
      4. Institute of Advanced Motorists. Don’t poke me I’m driving: a simulator study on smartphone use. 2012.

        • Olson R.L.
        • Hanowski R.J.
        • Hickman J.S.
        • Bocanegra J.L.
        Driver distraction in commercial vehicle operations.
        USDOT. 2009; (
        • Dingus T.A.
        Estimates of prevalence and risk associated with inattention and distraction based upon in situ naturalistic data.
        Ann Adv Automot Med. 2014; 58: 60-68
        • Klauer S.G.
        • Guo F.
        • Simons-Morton B.G.
        • Ouimet M.C.
        • Lee S.E.
        • Dingus T.A.
        Distracted driving and risks of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 54-59
        • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
        Traffic safety facts research note: driver electronic device use in 2011.
        USDOT. 2013;
        • Braitman K.A.
        • McCartt A.T.
        National reported patterns of driver cell phone use in the U.S..
        Traffic Inj Prev. 2010; 11: 543-548
      5. Lenhart A. Teens, smartphones & texting. Pew Research Center. 2012.

      6. Gross A, Romine F. More than a quarter of Houston teens read a text or email every time they drive, according to a study by University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute and Toyota. Toyota USA Newsroom, 2013.

        • Atchley P.
        • Hadlock C.
        • Lane S.
        Stuck in the 70s: the role of social norms in distracted driving.
        Accid Anal Prev. 2012; 48: 279-284
        • Schar E.
        • Gutierrez K.
        • Murphy-Hoefer R.
        • Nelson D.E.
        Tobacco use prevention media campaigns: lessons learned from youth in nine countries.
        CDC. 2006;
      7. Texas A&M Transportation Institute. Teens in the driver seat. TAMU System. 2013.

        • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
        National Distracted Driving Enforcement Campaign.
        USDOT. 2014;
      8. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Counseling about proper use of motor vehicle occupant restraints and avoidance of alcohol use to prevent injury. USPSTF. 2007.

        • Liberty Mutual and Students Against Destructive Decisions (SADD)
        Liberty Mutual & SADD: promoting responsible teen driver behavior.
        Liberty Mutual Group. 2013;
        • Bianchi A.
        • Summala H.
        The “genetics” of driving behavior: parents’ driving style predicts their children’s driving style.
        Accid Anal Prev. 2004; 36: 655-659
        • National Highway
        Safety Traffic Administration. National telephone survey on distracted driving attitudes and behaviors—2012.
        USDOT. 2013;
        • Abouk R.
        • Adams S.
        Texting bans and fatal accidents on roadways: do they work? Or do drivers just react to announcements of bans?.
        Appl Econ. 2013; 5: 179-199
        • McCartt A.T.
        • Northrup V.S.
        Factors related to seat belt use among fatally injured teenage drivers.
        J Safety Res. 2004; 35: 29-38
        • Governors Highway Safety Association
        Distracted driving laws.
        GHSA. 2014;
        • Office of the Press Secretary
        Executive order: federal leadership on reducing text messaging while driving.
        The White House. 2009;
      9. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Limiting the use of wireless communication devices. USDOT. 2010.

      10. Highway Loss Data Institute. Highway Loss Data Institute bulletin: texting laws and collision claim frequencies. HLDI. 2010.

        • Chaudhary N.K.
        • Casanova-Powell T.D.
        • Cosgrove L.
        • Reagan I.
        • Williams A.
        Evaluation of NHTSA distracted driving demonstration projects in Connecticut and New York.
        811. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington DC2012 (Report No.: DOT HS/811 635)
        • Foss R.D.
        • Feaganes J.R.
        • Rodgman E.A.
        Initial effects of graduated driver licensing on 16-year-old driver crashes in North Carolina.
        JAMA. 2001; 286: 1588-1592
        • Cheng J.D.
        • Schubmehl H.
        • Kahn S.A.
        • et al.
        Impact of a graduated driver’s license law on crashes involving young drivers in New York State.
        J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 73: 457-461
        • Hallmark S.L.
        • Veneziano D.A.
        • Falb S
        • Pawlovich M.
        • Witt D.
        Evaluation of Iowa’s graduated driver’s licensing program.
        Accid Anal Prev. 2008; 40: 1401-1405
        • Males M.
        California’s graduated driver license law: effect on teenage drivers’ deaths through 2005.
        J Safety Res. 2007; 38: 651-659
        • Masten S.V.
        • Foss R.D.
        • Marshall S.W.
        Graduated driver licensing and fatal crashes involving 16- to 19-year-old drivers.
        JAMA. 2011; 306: 1098-1103
        • McCartt A.T.
        • Teoh E.R.
        • Fields M.
        • Braitman K.A.
        • Hellinga L.A.
        Graduated licensing laws and fatal crashes of teenage drivers: a national study.
        Traffic Inj Prev. 2010; 11: 240-248
        • Lyon J.D.
        • Pan R.
        • Li J.
        National evaluation of the effect of graduated driver licensing laws on teenager fatality and injury crashes.
        J Safety Res. 2012; 43: 29-37
        • Goodwin A.H.
        • O’Brien N.P.
        • Foss R.D.
        Effect of North Carolina’s restriction on teenage driver cell phone use two years after implementation.
        Accid Anal Prev. 2012; 48: 363-367
        • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
        Distracted driving high visibility enforcement demonstrations in California and Delaware.
        USDOT. 2014;
      11. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, Orthopaedic Trauma Association. Wreck-less checklist. Decide to Drive. 2013.

        • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
        Blueprint for ending distracted driving.
        USDOT. 2012;
      12. American Medical Association. H-15.952 Ban the use of hand-held devices while driving. Res 217, I-08; Appended: Res 905, I-09.

        • Ship A.N.
        The most primary of care—talking about driving and distraction.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 2145-2147
        • Lee V.K.
        • Champagne C.R.
        Fracescutti UT. Fatal distraction: cell phone use while driving.
        Can Fam Physician. 2013; 59: 723-725
        • D’Angelo L.J.
        • Halpern-Felsher B.L.
        From the exam room to behind the wheel: can healthcare providers affect automobile morbidity and mortality in teens?.
        Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35: S304-S309