- Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
- community health services
- decision making
- evidence-based medicine
- practice guidelines
- preventive health services
- public health practice
- review literature
- motor vehicles
- seat belts
- accidents, traffic
- accident prevention
- automobile driving
- alcohol drinking
- wounds and injuries
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Discussion National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic safety facts, 1999: a compilation of motor vehicle crash data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2000. DOT HS 809 100.
National Center for Health Statistics. Healthy People 2000 Review, 1998–99. Hyattsville, MD: Public Health Service, 1999. DHHS Pub No (PHS) 99–1256.
Bureau of the Census, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. Census data to calculate the rate of alcohol-related motor vehicle crash fatalities. 2000. Available at: www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/popest.html. Accessed November 1, 2000.
- Healthy People 2010, 2nd ed..With understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health, 2 vols. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC2000
- Recommendations to reduce injuries to motor vehicle occupants.Am J Prev Med. 2001; 21: 16-22
- Task Force on Community Preventive Services; Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services—methods.Am J Prev Med. 2000; 18: 35-43
- Methods for conducting systematic reviews of the evidence of effectiveness and economic efficiency of interventions to reduce injuries to motor vehicle occupants.Am J Prev Med. 2001; 21: 23-30
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). 2001. Available at: www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/ncsa/fars.html. Accessed February 21, 2001.
9. Klein T. A method for estimating posterior BAC distributions for persons involved in fatal traffic accidents: final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1986. DOT HS 807 094.
- Lowering state legal blood alcohol limits to 0.08%.Am J Public Health. 1996; 86: 1297-1299
Apsler R, Char AR, Harding WM, Klein TM. The effects of .08 BAC laws. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis, 1999. DOT HS 808 892.
Foss RD, Stewart JR, Reinfurt DW. Evaluation of the effects of North Carolina’s 0.08% BAC law. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, 1998. DOT HS 808 893. Available at: www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/ncsa/nc08.html. Accessed September 6, 2001.
- Effects of recent 0.08% legal blood alcohol limits on fatal crash involvement.Inj Prev. 2000; 6: 109-114
Johnson D, Fell J. The impact of lowering the illegal BAC limit to .08 in five states. 39th Annual Proceedings, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, October 16–18, 1995, Chicago, Illinois.
Research and Evaluation Associates. The effects following the implementation of an 0.08 BAC limit and administrative per se law in California. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis, 1991. DOT HS 807 777.
Rogers PN. The general deterrent impact of California’s 0.08% blood alcohol concentration limit and administrative per se license suspension laws, Volume 1. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles, Research and Development Section, 1995. No. CAL-DMV-RSS-95-158.
Scopatz, R.A., Methodological study of between-states comparisons, with particular application to .08% BAC law evaluation. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 77th annual meeting, January 11–15, 1998, Washington, DC.
- The relationship of alcohol safety laws to drinking drivers in fatal crashes.Accid Anal Prev. 2000; 32: 483-492
Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001. Public law no. 106-346. 2000.
- Alcohol-related relative risk of driver fatalities and driver involvement in fatal crashes in relation to driver age and gender.J Stud Alcohol. 2000; 61: 387-395
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. On DWI laws in other countries. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2000. DOT HS 809 037.
- Lower legal blood alcohol limits for young drivers.Public Health Rep. 1994; 109: 738-744
Blomberg RD. Lower BAC limits for youth: evaluation of the Maryland .02 law. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1992. DOT HS 807 860.
- Effect of the Victorian Zero BAC legislation on serious casualty accidents.J Safety Res. 1989; 20: 129-137
Lacey JH, Jones RK, Wiliszowski CH. Zero tolerance laws for youth: four states’ experience. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2000. DOT HS 809 053.
Maisey GE. The effect of lowering the statutory alcohol limit for first year drivers from 0.08 to 0.02 gm/100ml (monograph). Perth, Western Australia: Western Australia Police Department, Research and Statistics Section, 1984. Research Report 84/2.
- Effect of low proscribed blood alcohol levels (BALs) on traffic accidents among newly-licensed drivers.Med Sci Law. 1986; 26: 144-148
Streff FM, Hopp ML. Evaluation of Michigan’s under age 21 zero-tolerance alcohol-impaired driving law. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, 1997. UMTRI 97-50.
Voas RB, Lange JE, Tippetts AS. Enforcement of the zero tolerance law in California: a missed opportunity? 42nd Annual Proceedings: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, October 5–7, 1998. Charlottesville, VA. pp. 369–383.
Voas RB, Tippetts AS, Fell J. The United States limits drinking by youth under age 21: Does this reduce fatal crash involvements? 43rd Annual Proceedings Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, September 20–21, 1999. Barcelona (Sitges), Spain. pp. 265–78.
- Effects of Maine’s 1982 .02 law to reduce teenage driving after drinking.Alcohol Drugs Driving. 1989; 5: 25-36
- Reduced BAC limits for young people (impact on night fatal crashes).Alcohol Drugs Driving. 1991; 7: 117-127
- Child passenger deaths and injuries involving drinking drivers.JAMA. 2000; 283: 2249-2252
- Highway crash costs in the United States by driver age, blood alcohol level, victim age, and restraint use.Accid Anal Prev. 1998; 30: 137-150
- Methods for systematic reviews of economic evaluations for the Guide to Community Preventive Services.Am J Prev Med. 2000; 18: 75-91
- Effects of minimum drinking age laws on alcohol use, related behaviors and traffic crash involvement among American youth.J Stud Alcohol. 1991; 52: 478-491
- Reduction in motor vehicle fatalities associated with an increase in the minimum drinking age.JAMA. 1988; 260: 3604-3610
- The impact of raising the minimum drinking age on driver fatalities.Int J Addict. 1986; 21: 1331-1338
- Reforming highway safety in New York State.Soc Sci Q. 1990; 71: 373-382
- Effect of drinking age laws and alcohol-related crashes.J Policy Anal Manage. 1995; 14: 555-566
- Impact of minimum drinking age laws on fatal crash involvements.J Traffic Safety Educ. 1989; 37: 4-5
- Legal minimum drinking age in Texas.J Safety Res. 1986; 17: 165-178
- Effect of raising the legal minimum drinking age on fatal crashes in 10 states.J Safety Res. 1986; 17: 117-121
- Minimum purchase age for alcohol and young-driver fatal crashes.J Legal Stud. 1986; 15: 181-211
- Impact of legislation raising the legal drinking age in Massachusetts from 18 to 20.Am J Public Health. 1983; 73: 163-169
- The effect of raising the legal minimum drinking age on involvement in fatal crashes.J Legal Stud. 1983; 12: 169-179
- Legislation raising the legal drinking age in Massachusetts from 18 to 20.J Stud Alcohol. 1984; 45: 534-539
- Preventing highway crashes by raising the legal minimum age for drinking.J Safety Res. 1986; 17: 101-109
- Effects of raising the legal drinking age in Ontario.Br J Addict. 1981; 76: 415-425
- Policy design, social regulation and theory building.Political Res Q. 1993; 46: 641-656
Lillis R, Williams T, Williford W. The impact of the 19-year-old drinking age in New York. Advances in Substance Abuse 1987;Suppl 1, Control Issues in Alcohol Abuse Prevention: Strategies for States and Communities:133–46.
- Raising the legal drinking age in Maine.Int J Addict. 1983; 18: 365-377
- The legal minimum drinking age and fatal motor vehicle crashes.J Legal Stud. 1975; 4: 219-239
- Teenage driver fatalities following reduction in the legal drinking age.J Safety Res. 1975; 7: 74-79
- The impact of Massachusetts reduced drinking age on auto accidents.Accid Anal Prev. 1976; 8: 229-239
- A study of alcohol involvement in young driver accidents with the lowering of the legal age of drinking in Alabama.Accid Anal Prev. 1981; 13: 319-322
- Fatal crashes among Michigan youth following reduction of legal drinking age.Q J Stud Alcohol. 1974; 35: 283-286
- Collision behavior of young drivers.J Stud Alcohol. 1975; 36: 1208-1223
- The effect of legislated lowering of the drinking age on total highway accidents among young drivers in Alberta, 1970–1972.Can J Public Health. 1976; 67: 161-163
- Effect on traffic safety of lowering the drinking age in three Australian states.J Drug Issues. 1986; 16: 183-198
- Alcohol policies and highway vehicle fatalities.J Health Econ. 1996; 15: 435-454
- Does the minimum drinking age affect traffic fatalities?.J Policy Anal Manage. 1987; 6: 180-192
- Reducing drunken driving.South Econ J. 1987; 54: 322-334
- Policies to reduce alcohol-impaired driving.Soc Sci Q. 1994; 75: 594-606
- Breath testing and highway fatality rates.Appl Econ. 1989; 21: 901-912
- Drinking age laws and highway mortality rates.Econ Inquiry. 1987; 25: 403-417
- Raising the alcohol purchase age.J Legal Stud. 1987; 16: 249-266
- The effect of minimum drinking age legislation on youthful auto fatalities.J Legal Stud. 1984; 13: 169-190
- Blood alcohol in fatally injured drivers and the minimum legal drinking age.J Health Polit Policy Law. 1989; 14: 817-825
- The relationship of beer consumption and state alcohol and motor vehicle policies to fatal accidents.J Safety Res. 1983; 14: 84-89
- The alcohol beverage purchase age and single-vehicle highway fatalities.J Safety Res. 1984; 15: 159-162
- Young driver fatalities.South Econ J. 1990; 57: 512-520
- Alcohol control policies and motor vehicle fatalities.J Legal Stud. 1993; 22: 161-186
- Beer taxes, the legal drinking age, and youth motor vehicle fatalities.J Legal Stud. 1987; 16: 351-374
- State alcohol policies, teen drinking and traffic fatalities.J Public Econ. 1999; 72: 289-315
- Legislating traffic safety.Soc Sci Q. 1995; 76: 328-345
- Mandatory seat belt laws in the states.Eval Rev. 1996; 20: 146-159
Arnold R. Effect of raising the legal drinking age on driver involvement in fatal crashes: the experience of thirteen states. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1985. DOT HS 806 902.
- Effects of an increase in the legal minimum drinking age.Public Health Policy. 1981; 2: 206-224
- Effects of the raised legal drinking age on motor vehicle accidents in Michigan.HSRI Res Rev. 1981; 11: 1-8
Skinner D, Hoxie P. Effects of minimum drinking age laws on highway fatalities. Cambridge, MA: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Transportation Systems Center, 1989. DOT-TSC-HS970-PM-89-1.
- Drunk driving. Yale University Press, New Haven1992
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The use of sobriety checkpoints for impaired driving enforcement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1990. DOT HS 807 656.
- Drink-driving countermeasures in Australia.Alcohol Drugs Driving. 1988; 4: 113-144
Castle SP, Thompson JD, Spataro JA, et al. Early evaluation of a statewide sobriety checkpoint program. 39th annual proceedings, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, October 16–18, 1995, Chicago, IL. pp. 65–78.
Jones R, Joksch H, Lacey J, Wiliszowski C, Marchetti L. Site report: Wichita, Kansas field test of combined speed, alcohol, and safety belt enforcement strategies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1995. DOT HS 808 244.
- Enforcement and public information strategies for DWI (driving-while-intoxicated) general deterrence. University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, Chapel Hill, NC1986
Lacey JH, Marchetti LM, Stewart JR, et al. Enforcement and public information strategies for DWI general deterrence: the Indianapolis, Indiana experience. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1988. DOT HS 807 434.
Lacey JH, Jones RK. Assessment of changes in DWI enforcement/level: final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1991. DOT HS 807 690.
Lacey JH, Jones RK, Smith RG. Evaluation of checkpoint Tennessee: Tennessee’s statewide sobriety checkpoint program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Adminis-tration, 1999. DOT HS 808 841.
- Traffic safety effects of sobriety checkpoints and other local DWI programs in New Jersey.Am J Public Health. 1989; 79: 291-293
- An assessment of county programs to reduce driving while intoxicated.Health Educ Res. 1990; 5: 247-256
- The relationships among driving while impaired charges, police drinking-driving roadcheck activity, media coverage and alcohol-related casualty traffic accidents.Accid Anal Prev. 1985; 17: 467-474
Mercer GW, Cooper PJ, Kristiansen LA. A cost/benefit analysis of a 5-month intensive alcohol-impaired driving road check campaign. 40th annual proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, October 7–9, 1996, Vancouver, British Columbia. pp. 283–92.
Stuster JW, Blowers PA. Experimental evaluation of sobriety checkpoint programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Safety Traffic Administration, 1995. DOT HS 808 287.
- A prevention programme for drinking and driving.Accid Anal Prev. 1980; 12: 267-274
Voas RB, Rhodenzer E, Lynn C. Evaluation of Charlottesville checkpoint operation: Final report, December 30, 1983 to December 31, 1984. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1985. US DOT Contract no. DTNH 22-83-C-05088.
- Enforcing alcohol-impaired driving and seat belt use laws, Binghamton, NY.J Safety Res. 1992; 23: 63-71
- The effect of drinking and driving interventions on alcohol-involved traffic crashes within a comprehensive community trial.Addiction. 1997; 92: S221-S236
- Methodologies for the evaluation of local traffic safety programs.Eval Program Plann. 1988; 11: 255-266
- R.I.D.E. (Reduce Impaired Driving in Etobicoke). Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto1979
Armour M, Monk K, South D, Chomiak G. Evaluation of the 1983 Melbourne random breath testing campaign: interim report, casualty accident analysis. Melbourne, Australia: Victoria Road Traffic Authority, 1985. N8-85.
- Trends in injury and death in motor vehicle accidents in Australia in relation to the introduction of random breath testing.Aust Drug Alcohol Rev. 1988; 7: 251-259
Arthurson RM. Evaluation of random breath testing. Sydney: Traffic Authority of New South Wales, 1985. Research Note RN 10/85.
Cameron MH, Cavallo A, Sullivan G. Evaluation of the random breath testing initiative in Victoria, 1989-1991: multivariate time series approach. Melbourne, Australia: Monash University Accident Research Centre, 1992. Report 38.
Cameron M, Diamantopolou K, Mullan N, Dyte D, Gantzer S. Evaluation of the country random breath testing and publicity program in Victoria, 1993–1994. Melbourne: Monash University Accident Research Center, 1997. Report 126.
- Drinking and driving.Br Med J. 1987; 295: 101-103
- Effects of random breath testing on hospital admissions of traffic-accident casualties in the Hunter Health Region.Med J Aust. 1985; 142: 625-626
Hendrie D, Cooper L, Ryan G, Kirov C. Review of the random breath testing program in Western Australia in 1996/1997. Nedlands, WA 6907: Road Accident Prevention Research Unit, Department of Public Health, the University of Western Australia, 1998. Research Report RR67.
Henstridge J, Homel R, Mackay P. The long-term effects of random breath testing in four Australian states: a time series analysis. Canberra, Australia: Federal Office of Road Safety, 1997. No. CR 162.
- Publicity, police resources and the effectiveness of random breath testing.Med J Aust. 1990; 152: 284-286
McLean AJ, Clark MS, Dorsch MM, Holubowycz OT, McCaul KA. Random breath testing in South Australia: effects on drink-driving. Adelaide, South Australia: NHMRC Road Accident Research Unit, University of Adelaide, 1984. HS 038 357.
- Random breath testing in New South Wales.Med J Aust. 1983; 1: 620-621
- Deterrence of drinking and driving in France.Law Soc Rev. 1981; 16: 345-374
Homel R. The impact of random breath testing in New South Wales, December 1982 to February 1983. Med J Aust 1983;616–9.
- Drink-driving law enforcement and the legal blood alcohol limit in New South Wales.Accid Anal Prev. 1994; 26: 147-155
Michigan Department of State Police v Sitz, 496 U.S. 444, 110 L. Ed. 2d 412, 1990 U.S. LEXIS 3144, 110 S. Ct. 2481, 58 U.S.L.W. 4781 (1990).
- Costs and benefits of a community sobriety checkpoint program.J Stud Alcohol. 1998; 59: 462-468
- Costs and benefits of police enforcement in the Netherlands.in: Perrine M.W Alcohol, drugs, & traffic safety proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs & Traffic Safety, Chicago, IL, October 24–27, 1989. National Safety Council, Chicago, IL1990
- Research on drinking locations of alcohol-impaired drivers.J Public Health Policy. 1985; 6: 510-525
- Drinking locations of drink-drivers.Accid Anal Prev. 1991; 23: 573-584
- Alcohol policies in the United States. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis2000
- Qualitative assessment of training programs for alcohol servers and establishment managers.Public Health Rep. 1998; 113: 162-169
- Behavior change approaches to deterring alcohol-impaired driving.in: Advances in health education and promotion. Vol. 3. Jessica Kingsley, London, England1991
- The effect of enforcement upon service of alcohol to intoxicated patrons of bars and restaurants.Accid Anal Prev. 1994; 26: 79-88
Holder H, Wagenaar A, Saltz RF, Mosher J, Janes K. Alcoholic beverage server liability and the reduction of alcohol-related problems: evaluation of dram shop laws (final report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1990. DOT HS 807 628.
- Reducing violence in licensed venues through community safety action projects.Contemp Drug Problems. 1998; 25: 511-551
- Server intervention.Health Educ Res. 1990; 5: 237-245
- The role of bars and restaurants in preventing alcohol-impaired driving.Eval Health Professions. 1987; 10: 5-27
- Research needs and opportunities in server intervention programs.Health Educ Q. 1989; 16: 429-438
- Mandated server training and reduced alcohol-involved traffic crashes.Accid Anal Prev. 1994; 26: 89-97
- The role of alcohol providers in prevention.Addiction. 1993; 88: 1195-1203
- Factors influencing the effectiveness of server-intervention education.J Stud Alcohol. 1991; 52: 389-397
- Responsible alcohol service.Am J Public Health. 1991; 81: 197-199
- Training bar personnel to prevent drunken driving.Am J Public Health. 1987; 77: 952-954
- A community-wide responsible beverage service program in three communities.Addiction. 1997; 92: s237-s249
- Can training bar staff in responsible serving practices reduce alcohol-related harm?.Drug Alcohol Rev. 1998; 17: 39-50
- Does server intervention training make a difference?.Alcohol Health Res World. 1987; 11: 64-69
McKnight AJ. Development and field test of a responsible alcohol service program. Volume III: Final results. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1989. DOT HS 807 449.
- Server intervention.Alcohol Health Res World. 1986; 10: 12-19
Stockwell TR, Rydon P, Lang E, Beel AC. An evaluation of the “Freo Respects You” responsible alcohol service project. Perth, Western Australia: National Centre for Research into the Prevention of Drug Abuse, Division of Health Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, 1993. NDRI Technical Report No. T40.
- Beyond server training.Alcohol Health Res World. 1986; 10: 24-27
- Strategies to reduce driving under the influence of alcohol.Annu Rev Public Health. 1998; 19: 359-378
- A community prevention trial to reduce alcohol-involved accidental injury and death.Addiction. 1997; 92: S155-S171
- Prevalence of alcohol-impaired driving.JAMA. 1997; 277: 122-125
☆The research described in this article was awarded the Department of Health and Human Services Secretary’s Award for Distinguished Service.