Trends in Care Practices and Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Diabetes


      While diabetes is a major issue for the aging U.S. population, few studies have described the recent trends in both preventive care practices and complications among the Medicare population with diabetes. Using the Medicare Quality Monitoring System (MQMS), this 2004 study describes these trends from 1992 to 2001 and how these rates vary across demographic subgroups.


      Outcomes include age- and gender-adjusted rates of 15 indicators associated with diabetes care from 1992 to 2001, the absolute change in rates from 1992 to 2001, and 2001 rates by demographic subgroups. The data were cross-sectional samples of Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes from 1992 to 2001 from the Medicare 5% Standard Analytic Files.


      Use of preventive care practices rose from 1992 to 2001: 45 percentage points for HbA1c tests, 51 for lipid tests, 8 for eye exams, and 38 for self-monitoring of glucose levels (all p<0.05). Rates for short-term and some long-term complications of diabetes (e.g., lower-extremity amputations and cardiovascular conditions) fell from 1992 to 2001 (p<0.05). However, rates of other long-term complications such as nephropathy, blindness, and retinopathy rose during the period (p<0.05). Nonwhites and beneficiaries aged <65 and >85 exhibited consistently higher complication rates and lower use of preventive services.


      The Medicare program has seen some significant improvement in preventive care practices and significant declines in lower-limb amputations and cardiovascular conditions. However, rates for other long-term complications have increased, with evidence of subgroup disparities. The MQMS results provide an early warning for policymakers to focus on the diabetes care provided to some vulnerable subgroups.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • American Diabetes Association
        Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2002.
        Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: 917-932
        • American Diabetes Association
        Economic consequences of diabetes mellitus in the U.S. in 1997.
        Diabetes Care. 1998; 21: 296-309
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        1999 Diabetes surveillance report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta GA1999
        • Mokdad A.H.
        • Ford E.S.
        • Bowman B.A.
        • et al.
        Diabetes trends in the U.S..
        Diabetes Care. 2000; 23: 1278-1283
        • Krop J.S.
        • Saudek C.D.
        • Weller W.E.
        • Powe N.R.
        • Shaffer T.
        • Anderson G.F.
        Predicting expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes.
        Diabetes Care. 1999; 22: 1660-1666
        • Weinberger M.
        • Cowper P.A.
        • Kirkman M.S.
        • Vinicor F.
        Economic impact of diabetes mellitus in the elderly.
        Clin Geriatr Med. 1990; 6: 959-970
        • Jencks S.F.
        • Huff E.D.
        • Cuerdon T.
        Change in the quality of care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries, 1998–1999 to 2000–2001.
        JAMA. 2003; 289: 305-312
        • Leid T.R.
        • Sheingold S.
        HEDIS performance measures in Medicare managed care.
        Health Care Finance Rev. 2001; 23: 149-160
        • Jha A.K.
        • Perlin J.B.
        • Kizer K.W.
        • Dudley R.A.
        Effect of transformation of the Veterans Affairs health care system on the quality of care.
        N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 2218-2227
        • Lojo M.
        • Burrows N.R.
        • Geiss L.S.
        • Tierney E.F.
        • Wang J.
        • Engelgau M.M.
        Preventive-care practices among persons with diabetes—United States, 1995 and 2001.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002; 51: 965-969
        • Imperatore G.
        • Cadwell B.L.
        • Geiss L.
        • et al.
        Thirty-year trends in cardiovascular risk factor levels among US adults with diabetes.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 160: 531-539
        • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
        2nd ed. Healthy people 2010. Understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health. Government Printing Office, Washington DC2000
        • Bertoni A.G.
        • Krop J.S.
        • Anderson G.F.
        • Brancati F.L.
        Diabetes-related morbidity and mortality in a national sample of U.S. elders.
        Diabetes Care. 2002; 25: 471-475
        • Wetterhall S.F.
        • Olson D.R.
        • DeStefano F.
        • et al.
        Trends in diabetes and diabetic complications.
        Diabetes Care. 1992; 15: 960-967
        • Bertoni A.G.
        • Hundley W.G.
        • Massing M.W.
        • Bonds D.E.
        • Burke G.L.
        • Goff Jr, D.C.
        Heart failure prevalence, incidence and mortality in the elderly with diabetes.
        Diabetes Care. 2004; 27: 699-703
      1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes Surveillance System. Available at: . Accessed March 24, 2004.

        • Arday D.R.
        • Fleming B.B.
        • Keller D.K.
        • et al.
        Variation in diabetes care among states.
        Diabetes Care. 2002; 25: 2230-2237
        • Krop J.S.
        • Power N.R.
        • Weller W.E.
        • Shaffer T.J.
        • Saudek C.D.
        • Anderson G.F.
        Patterns of expenditures and use of services among older adults with diabetes.
        Diabetes Care. 1998; 21: 747-752
        • Hebert P.L.
        • Geiss L.S.
        • Tierney E.F.
        • Engelgau M.M.
        • Yawn B.P.
        • McBean A.M.
        Identifying persons with diabetes using Medicare claims data.
        Am J Med Qual. 1999; 14: 270-277
      2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. U.S. Renal Data System (USRDS). USRDS 2003 annual data report: atlas of end-stage renal disease in the United States. Bethesda MD: National Institutes of Health, 2003.

        • Fleming B.B.
        • Greenfield S.
        • Engelgau M.M.
        • Pogach L.M.
        • Clauser S.B.
        • Parrott M.A.
        The Diabetes Quality Improvement Project.
        Diabetes Care. 2001; 24: 1815-1820
        • Anderson R.N.
        • Rosenberg H.M.
        Age standardization of death rates.
        Natl Vital Stat Rep. 1998; 47: 1-16
        • Ferguson J.J.
        NHLBI BARI clinical alert on diabetics treated with angioplasty.
        Circulation. 1995; 92: 3371
        • National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
        Seven-year outcome in the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI) by treatment and diabetic status.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 1122-1129
        • Wrobel J.S.
        • Mayfield J.A.
        • Reiber G.E.
        Geographic variation in lower-extremity major amputation in individuals with and without diabetes in the Medicare population.
        Diabetes Care. 2002; 24: 860-864
      3. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases. Kidney disease of diabetes. Available at: Accessed September 3, 2003.

        • Institute of Medicine
        Unequal treatment. National Academy Press, Washington DC2002
        • McBean A.M.
        • Huang Z.
        • Virnig B.A.
        • Lurie N.
        • Musgrave D.
        Racial variation in the control of diabetes among elderly Medicare managed care beneficiaries.
        Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: 3250-3256
      4. Gold M, Achman L, Mittler J, Stevens B. Monitoring Medicare+Choice: what have we learned? Findings and operational lessons for Medicare Advantage. Washington DC: Mathematica Policy Research, August 2004.

      5. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus.
        Diabetes Care. 1997; 20: 1183-1197
      6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. No cholesterol check within 5 years. Available at: . Accessed February 18, 2005.

      7. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCUPnet, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at: Accessed February 20, 2005.