Article| Volume 33, ISSUE 2, SUPPLEMENT , S130-S143, August 2007

School-Based Interventions for Aggressive and Disruptive Behavior

Update of a Meta-Analysis
  • Sandra Jo Wilson
    Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Sandra Jo Wilson, PhD, Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies, 1207 18th Ave. South, Nashville TN 37212.
    Center for Evaluation Research and Methodology, Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
    Search for articles by this author
  • Mark W. Lipsey
    Center for Evaluation Research and Methodology, Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
    Search for articles by this author


      Research about the effectiveness of school-based psychosocial prevention programs for reducing aggressive and disruptive behavior was synthesized using meta-analysis. This work updated previous work by the authors and further investigated which program and student characteristics were associated with the most positive outcomes.


      Two hundred forty-nine experimental and quasi-experimental studies of school-based programs with outcomes representing aggressive and/or disruptive behavior were obtained. Effect sizes and study characteristics were coded from these studies and analyzed.


      Positive overall intervention effects were found on aggressive and disruptive behavior and other relevant outcomes. The most common and most effective approaches were universal programs and targeted programs for selected/indicated children. The mean effect sizes for these types of programs represent a decrease in aggressive/disruptive behavior that is likely to be of practical significance to schools. Multicomponent comprehensive programs did not show significant effects and those for special schools or classrooms were marginal. Different treatment modalities (e.g., behavioral, cognitive, social skills) produced largely similar effects. Effects were larger for better-implemented programs and those involving students at higher risk for aggressive behavior.


      Schools seeking prevention programs may choose from a range of effective programs with some confidence that whatever they pick will be effective. Without the researcher involvement that characterizes the great majority of programs in this meta-analysis, schools might be well-advised to give priority to those that will be easiest to implement well in their settings.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Gottfredson G.D.
        • Gottfredson D.C.
        • Czeh E.R.
        • Cantor D.
        • Crosse S.
        • Hantman I.
        National study of delinquency prevention in schools. Gottfredson Associates, Inc, Ellicott City (MD)2000 (Final Report, Grant No. 96-MU-MU-0008.)
        • Brener N.D.
        • Martindale J.
        • Weist M.D.
        Mental health and social services: results from the School Health Policies and Program Study.
        J Sch Health. 2001; 71: 305-312
        • Wilson S.J.
        • Lipsey M.W.
        • Derzon J.H.
        The effects of school-based intervention programs on aggressive and disruptive behavior: a meta-analysis.
        J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71: 136-149
        • Gottfredson D.C.
        • Gottfredson G.D.
        Quality of school-based prevention programs: results from a national survey.
        J Res Crime Delinq. 2002; 39: 3-35
        • Durlak J.A.
        School-based prevention programs for children and adolescents. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA1995
        • Durlak J.A.
        Primary prevention programs in schools.
        Adv Clin Child Psych. 1997; 19: 283-318
        • Gansle K.A.
        The effectiveness of school-based anger interventions and programs.
        J Sch Psychol. 2005; 43: 321-341
        • Lösel F.
        • Beelmann A.
        Effects of child skill training in preventing antisocial behavior: a systematic review of randomized evaluations.
        Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2003; 587: 84-109
        • Sukhodolsky D.G.
        • Kassinove H.
        • Gorman B.S.
        Cognitive–behavioral therapy for anger in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis.
        Aggress Violent Beh. 2004; 9: 247-269
        • Wilson D.B.
        • Gottfredson D.C.
        • Najaka S.S.
        School-based prevention of problem behaviors: a meta-analysis.
        J Quant Criminol. 2001; 17: 247-272
        • Hahn R.
        • Fuqua-Whitley D.
        • Wethington H.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of universal school-based programs to prevent violence: a systematic review.
        Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33: S114-S129
        • Cohen J.
        Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ1988
        • Lipsey M.W.
        • Wilson D.B.
        Practical meta-analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks2001
        • Hedges L.V.
        • Olkin D.
        Statistical methods for meta-analyses. Academic Press, San Diego, CA1985
        • Dolan L.J.
        • Kellam S.G.
        • Brown C.H.
        • Werthamer-Larsson L.
        • Rebok G.W.
        • Mayer L.S.
        • Laudolff J.
        • Turkkan J.S.
        • Ford C.
        • Wheller L.
        The short-term impact of two classroom-based preventive interventions on aggressive and shy behaviors and poor achievement.
        J Appl Dev Psychol. 1993; 14: 317-345
        • Shure M.B.
        • Spivack G.
        Interpersonal problem solving as a mediator of behavioral adjustment in preschool and kindergarten children.
        J Appl Dev Psychol. 1980; 1: 29-44
        • Lochman J.E.
        • Wells K.C.
        The Coping Power program at the middle-school transition: universal and indicated prevention effects.
        Psychol Addict Behav. 2002; 16: S40-S54
        • Gresham F.M.
        • Nagle R.J.
        Social skills training with children: responsiveness to modeling and coaching as a function of peer orientation.
        J Consult Clin Psych. 1980; 48: 718-729
        • Roseberry L.L.
        An applied experimental evaluation of conflict resolution curriculum and social skills development. Loyola Univ, Chicago (IL)1997 ([dissertation])
        • Nafpaktitis M.
        • Perlmuter B.F.
        School-based early mental health intervention with at-risk students.
        School Psychol Rev. 1998; 27: 420-432
        • Bestland D.E.
        A controlled experiment utilizing group counseling in four secondary schools in the Milwaukee public schools. Marquette Univ, Milwaukee (WI)1968 ([dissertation])
        • Miller P.H.
        The relative effectiveness of peer mediation: children helping each other to solve conflicts. Univ. of Mississippi, Oxford (MI)1995 ([dissertation])
        • Catalano R.F.
        • Mazza J.J.
        • Harachi T.W.
        • Abbott R.D.
        • Haggerty K.P.
        • Fleming C.B.
        Raising healthy children through enhancing social development in elementary school: results after 1.5 years.
        J School Psychol. 2003; 41: 143-164
        • Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group
        Initial impact of the Fast Track prevention trial for conduct problems: I. the high-risk sample.
        J Consult Clin Psych. 1999; 67: 631-647
        • Raudenbush S.W.
        Random effects models.
        in: Cooper H. Hedges L.V. The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York1994: 301-321
        • Weinstein R.S.
        • Soule C.R.
        • Collins R.
        • Cone J.
        • Mehlhorn M.
        • Simontacchi K.
        Expectations and high school change: teacher–researcher collaboration to prevent school failure.
        Am J Commun Psychol. 1991; 19: 333-363
        • Hudley C.A.
        Assessing the impact of separate schooling for African-American male adolescents.
        J Early Adolescence. 1995; 15: 38-57
        • DeVoe J.F.
        • Peter K.
        • Kaufman P.
        Indicators of school crime and safety: 2004. U.S. Departments of Education and Justice, Washington2004 (NCES 2005-002/NCJ 205290.)