Soft Drink Availability, Contracts, and Revenues in American Secondary Schools


      Soft drinks have been widely available in the nation’s schools for some years, but recently, in response to rising concern about the epidemic of obesity among youth, concerns have been raised as to whether they should be available, and if so, under what circumstances. This paper looks at how widespread soft drink availability is at present in schools, as well as the availability of other classes of beverages. Because overweight occurs disproportionately among minorities and those of lower socioeconomic status (SES), this paper also seeks to determine to what extent environmental conditions differ for these students. Differences between middle and high schools are also examined.


      Data for 2004 and 2005 were used from two ongoing United States national surveys: the Youth, Education, and Society (YES) study of school administrators (N=345), and the Monitoring the Future (MTF) study of secondary school students in 8th, 10th, and 12th grades surveyed in those same schools (N=37,543). Data were gathered in YES on the availability of various beverages in schools from vending machines and other venues, as well as about the presence and nature of pouring rights contracts with soft drink bottlers. Data were analyzed in 2006.


      The vast majority of high school students today have soft drinks available to them in the school environment both through vending machines (88%) and in the cafeteria at lunch (59%), with middle schools providing somewhat less access. Diet soft drinks are less available, particularly at lunch. Most students (67% in middle and 83% in high school) are in schools that have a contract with a bottler. Revenues to schools generated by soft drink sales are quite modest. Hispanics are most likely to have soft drinks available throughout the school day. The SES of the students correlates negatively with whether the school allows advertising and promotion of soft drinks.


      Current school practices regarding soft drink availability, advertising, and sales would seem likely to be contributing to the extent of overweight among American young people, and to some extent to the higher risk faced by Hispanic and lower SES youth.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Jolliffe D.
        Extent of overweight among U.S. children and adolescents from 1971 to 2000.
        Int J Obes. 2003; 28: 4-9
        • Institute of Medicine
        Preventing childhood obesity: Health in the balance.
        The National Academy Press, Washington DC2005
        • James J.
        • Thomas P.
        • Cavan D.
        • Kerr D.
        Preventing childhood obesity by reducing consumption of carbonated drinks: cluster randomized trial.
        British Med J. 2004; 328: 1237
        • Kranz S.
        • Smiciklas-Wright H.
        • Siega-Riz A.M.
        • Mitchell D.
        Adverse effect of high added sugar consumption on dietary intake in American preschoolers.
        J Pediatr. 2005; 146: 105-111
        • Ludwig D.S.
        • Peterson J.K.E.
        • Fortmaker S.L.
        Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective, observational analysis.
        Lancet. 2001; 357: 505-508
        • Nicklas T.A.
        • Yang S.-J.
        • Baranowski T.
        • Zakeri I.
        • Berenson G.
        Eating patterns and obesity in children: The Bogalusa Heart Study.
        Am J Prev Med. 2003; 25: 9-16
        • Nielsen S.J.
        • Popkin B.M.
        Changes in beverage intake between 1977 and 2001.
        Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27: 205-210
        • Story M.
        • Hayes M.
        • Kalina B.
        Availability of foods in high schools: is there cause for concern?.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1996; 96: 123-126
        • Weber-Cullen K.
        • Zakeri I.
        Fruits, vegetables, milk, and sweetened beverages consumption and access to à la carte/snack bar meals at school.
        Am J Public Health. 2004; 94: 463-467
        • White A.A.
        • Nitzke S.
        • Peterson K.
        Are soft drinks getting a bum rap?.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004; 36: 266-271
        • Vartanian L.R.
        • Schwartz M.B.
        • Brownell K.D.
        Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Public Health. 2007; 97: 667-675
      1. General Accounting Office. Commercial activities in schools. GAO/HEHS-00-156. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. Available online at:

        • Story M.
        • French S.
        Food advertising and marketing directed at children and adolescents in the U.S..
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004; 1: 1-17
        • Wechsler H.
        • Brener N.D.
        • Kuester S.
        • Miller C.
        Food service and foods and beverages available at school: results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2000.
        J Sch Health. 2001; 71: 313-324
      2. Blanding M. Hard on soft drinks. Boston Globe 30 October 2005. Available online at:

      3. Sicher J. Special issue: top-10 CSD results for 2006. Beverage Digest 2007 Mar 8; Vol. 50 (no. 5). Available online at:

        • Molnar A.
        School commercialism hurts all children, ethnic minority group children most of all.
        J Negro Educ. 2003; 72: 371-378
      4. New York Times. 2005 (p. C4. 18 August)
      5. William J. Clinton Foundation. Alliance for a Healthier Generation – Clinton Foundation and American Heart Association – and industry leaders set healthy school beverage guidelines for U.S. schools. Available online at:

      6. NetScan’s Health Policy Tracking Service. State Actions to Promote Nutrition, Increase Physical Activity and Prevent Obesity: A 2006 First Quarter Legislative Overview. NETSCAN Publishing Inc. Available online at

        • Popkin B.M.
        • Armstrong L.E.
        • Bray G.M.
        • Caballero B.
        • Frei B.
        • Willett W.C.
        A new proposed guidance system for beverage consumption in the United States.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 83: 529-542
        • Delva J.
        • O’Malley P.M.
        • Johnston L.D.
        Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status differences in overweight and health-related behaviors among American students: national trends 1986–2003.
        J Adolesc Health. 2006; 39: 536-545
        • Delva J.
        • Johnston L.D.
        • O’Malley P.M.
        The epidemiology of overweight and related lifestyle behavior: racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status differences among American youths.
        Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33: S178-S186
        • Kimm S.Y.
        • Obarzanek E.
        Childhood obesity: a new pandemic of the new millennium.
        Pediatrics. 2002; 110: 1003-1007
        • Ogden C.L.
        • Flegal K.M.
        • Carroll M.D.
        • Johnson C.L.
        Prevalence and trends in overweight among U.S. children and adolescents, 1999–2000.
        JAMA. 2002; 288: 1728-1732
        • Johnston L.D.
        • O’Malley P.M.
        • Bachman J.G.
        • Schulenberg J.E.
        Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2004.
        (NIH Pub. No. 05-5727) National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda MD2005
        • Kish L.
        Survey Sampling.
        John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York1965
        • Warner M.
        Lines are drawn for big suit over sodas.
        New York Times. 2005 (December 7, C1–7)
      7. General Accounting Office. School meals programs: competitive foods are available in many schools; actions taken to restrict them differ by state and locality. GAO-04-673. Washington DC: General Accounting Office. Available online at: