Advertisement

Translating Physical Activity Recommendations into a Pedometer-Based Step Goal

3000 Steps in 30 Minutes

      Background

      It is a public health recommendation to accumulate at least 150 minutes per week of moderate intensity physical activity. Although pedometers are widely used as a physical activity–monitoring tool, they are unable to measure activity intensity. Translating current physical activity recommendations into a pedometer-based guideline could increase the public health impact of physical activity interventions.

      Methods

      A community sample of 97 adults (60% women, with a mean age of 32.1 [±10.6] years and a mean BMI of 28.8 [±5.5]) completed four 6-minute incremental walking bouts on a level treadmill at 65, 80, 95, and 110 m·min–1. A calibrated metabolic cart was used to measure energy expenditure at each speed. Steps were measured using a Yamax SW-200 pedometer. Step-rate cut points associated with minimally moderate-intensity activity (defined as 3 METs) were determined using multiple regression, mixed modeling, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. All data were collected and analyzed in 2006.

      Results

      For men, step counts per minute associated with walking at 3 METs were 92 step·min–1 (multiple regression); 101 step·min–1 (mixed modeling); and 102 step·min–1 (ROC curve). For women, step counts per minute associated with walking at 3 METs were 91 step·min–1 (multiple regression); 111 step·min–1 (mixed modeling); and 115 step·min–1 (ROC curve). However, for each analysis there was substantial error in model fit.

      Conclusions

      Moderate-intensity walking appears approximately equal to at least 100 step·min–1. However, step counts per minute is a poor proxy for METs, and so 100 step·min–1 should be used only as a general physical activity promotion heuristic. To meet current guidelines, individuals are encouraged to walk a minimum of 3000 steps in 30 minutes on 5 days each week. Three bouts of 1000 steps in 10 minutes each day can also be used to meet the recommended goal.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
        2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.
        ([pdf] 2008 Feb 8, 2009 [cited ODPHP Publication No. U0036;61])
        • Rice K.
        • Heesch K.
        • Dinger M.
        • Fields D.
        Effects of 2 brief interventions on women's understanding of moderate-intensity physical activity.
        J Phys Act Health. 2008; 5: 58-73
        • Craig C.L.
        • Cragg S.E.
        • Tudor-Locke C.E.
        • Bauman A.
        Proximal impact of Canada on the Move: the relationship of campaign awareness to pedometer ownership and use.
        Can J Public Health. 2006; 97 (S22–9): S21-S27
        • Schneider P.L.
        • Crouter S.E.
        • Bassett D.R.
        Pedometer measures of free-living physical activity: comparison of 13 models.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36: 331-335
        • Bravata D.M.
        • Spangler C.S.
        • Sundaram V.
        • et al.
        Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review.
        JAMA. 2007; 298: 2296-2304
        • Craig C.L.
        • Tudor-Locke C.E.
        • Bauman A.
        Twelve-month effects of Canada on the move: a population-wide campaign to promote pedometer use and walking.
        Health Educ Res. 2007; 22: 406-413
        • Wyatt H.R.
        • Peters J.C.
        • Reed G.W.
        • et al.
        Using electronic step counters to increase lifestyle physical activity: Colorado on the move.
        J Phys Act Health. 2004; 1: 181-190
        • Joyner K.
        • Mummery W.
        Awareness of the 10,000 steps program across Queensland.
        Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland2006
        • Eakin E.G.
        • Brown W.J.
        • Marshall A.L.
        • Mummery K.
        • Larsen E.
        Physical activity promotion in primary care: bridging the gap between research and practice.
        Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27: 297-303
        • Hatano Y.
        Use of the pedometer for promoting daily walking exercise.
        J Int Council Health Phys Educ Rec. 1993; 29: 4-8
        • Tudor-Locke C.E.
        • Bassett Jr, D.R.
        How many steps/day are enough?.
        Sports Med. 2004; 34: 1-8
        • Tudor-Locke C.E.
        • Jones R.
        • Myers A.M.
        • Paterson D.H.
        • Ecclestone N.A.
        Contribution of structured exercise class participation and informal walking for exercise to daily physical activity in community-dwelling older adults.
        Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002; 73: 350-356
        • Tudor-Locke C.E.
        • Sisson S.B.
        • Collova T.
        • Lee S.M.
        • Swan P.D.
        Pedometer-determined step count guidelines for classifying walking intensity in a young ostensibly healthy population.
        Can J Appl Physiol. 2005; 30: 666-676
        • Welk G.J.
        • Differding J.A.
        • Thompson R.W.
        • Blair S.N.
        • Dziura J.
        • Hart P.
        The utility of the Digi-walker step counter to assess daily physical activity patterns.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32: S481-S488
        • Wilde B.E.
        • Sidman C.L.
        • Corbin C.B.
        A 10,000-step count as a physical activity target for sedentary women.
        Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001; 72: 411-414
        • Welk G.J.
        Principles of design and analyses for the calibration of accelerometry-based activity monitors.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37: S501-S511
        • Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology
        PAR-Q and you.
        The Society, Ottawa ON1994
        • Crouter S.E.
        • Schneider P.L.
        • Karabulut M.
        • Bassett D.R.
        Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35: 1455-1460
        • Le Masurier G.C.
        • Lee S.M.
        • Tudor-Locke C.E.
        Motion sensor accuracy under controlled and free-living conditions.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36: 905-910
        • Schneider P.L.
        • Crouter S.E.
        • Lukajic O.
        • Bassett D.R.
        Accuracy and reliability of 10 pedometers for measuring steps over a 400-m walk.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35: 1779-1784
        • Tudor-Locke C.E.
        • Myers A.M.
        Methodological considerations for researchers and practitioners using pedometers to measure physical (ambulatory) activity.
        Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001; 72: 1-12
        • Borg G.A.
        Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982; 14: 377-381
        • Tudor-Locke C.E.
        • Myers A.M.
        Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults.
        Sports Med. 2001; 31: 91-100
        • USDHHS
        Making health communication programs work: a planner's guide.
        Diane Publishing Co, Darby PA2001
        • Riley P.O.
        • Paolini G.
        • Della Croce U.
        • Paylo K.W.
        • Kerrigan D.C.
        A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects.
        Gait Posture. 2007; 26: 17-24
        • Ainsworth B.E.
        • Haskell W.L.
        • Leon A.S.
        • et al.
        Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993; 25: 71-80