Advertisement

Demographic Profiles of Smokeless Tobacco Users in the U.S

      Background

      Users of smokeless tobacco (chew or snuff) in the U.S. are viewed demographically as being homogeneous. Prior studies have demonstrated such homogeneity in national survey data but have not utilized latent-variable methods. The objective of this study was to determine whether a single group or underlying subgroups best characterize users of smokeless tobacco.

      Methods

      Men aged >17 years who had used smokeless tobacco in the past month (n=4583) were selected from the 2003, 2004, and 2005 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. A latent-class analysis, conducted in 2008, was based on individual response patterns from six demographic variables and three items pertaining to the use of smokeless tobacco.

      Results

      Four latent classes were identified: older chew users (17.2%); younger poly-tobacco users (28.7%); skilled laborers with a high school diploma (27.5%); and educated professionals (26.6%). External validation of these classes indicated that older chew users and younger poly-tobacco users were more likely than the educated professionals to be former and current smokers, respectively.

      Conclusions

      While users of smokeless tobacco in the U.S. are predominantly white men, they are more heterogeneous with respect to education, occupation, and residency than commonly is perceived.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Foulds J.
        • Ramstrom L.
        • Burke M.
        • Fagerstrom K.
        Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden.
        Tob Control. 2003; 12: 349-359
        • Royal College of Physicians
        Harm reduction in nicotine addiction: helping people who can't quit.
        2007 (London)
        • Robins R.
        The seduction of harm reduction: proceedings from the September 2004 Summit.
        Department of Health Services, Sacramento CA2005
        • Foulds J.
        • Furberg H.
        Is low-nicotine Marlboro snus really snus?.
        Harm Reduct J. 2008; 5: 9
        • Gartner C.
        • Hall W.
        • Chapman S.
        • Freeman B.
        Should the health community promote smokeless tobacco (snus) as a harm reduction measure?.
        PLoS Med. 2007; 4: 1138-1141
        • Kozlowski L.T.
        Effect of smokeless tobacco product marketing and use on population harm from tobacco use policy perspective for tobacco-risk reduction.
        Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33: S379-S386
        • Giovino G.A.
        • Schooley M.W.
        • Zhu B.P.
        • et al.
        Surveillance for selected tobacco-use behaviors—U.S., 1900–1994.
        MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1994; 43: 1-43
        • Rimal R.N.
        • Lapinski M.K.
        • Cook R.J.
        • Real K.
        Moving toward a theory of normative influences: how perceived benefits and similarity moderate the impact of descriptive norms on behaviors.
        J Health Commun. 2005; 10: 433-450
        • Ebbert J.O.
        • Haddock C.K.
        • Vander Weg M.
        • Klesges R.C.
        • Poston W.S.
        • DeBon M.
        Predictors of smokeless tobacco initiation in a young adult military cohort.
        Am J Health Behav. 2006; 30: 103-112
        • Lando H.A.
        • Haddock C.K.
        • Klesges R.C.
        • Talcott G.W.
        • Jensen J.
        Smokeless tobacco use in a population of young adults.
        Addict Behav. 1999; 24: 431-437
        • Vander Weg M.W.
        • Peterson A.L.
        • Ebbert J.O.
        • DeBon M.
        • Klesges R.C.
        • Haddock C.K.
        Prevalence of alternative forms of tobacco use in a population of young adult military recruits.
        Addict Behav. 2008; 33: 69-82
        • Severson H.H.
        • Klein K.
        • Lichtensein E.
        • Kaufman N.
        • Orleans C.T.
        Smokeless tobacco use among professional baseball players: survey results, 1998 to 2003.
        Tob Control. 2005; 14: 31-36
        • Nelson D.E.
        • Mowery P.
        • Tomar S.
        • Marcus S.
        • Giovino G.
        • Zhao L.
        Trends in smokeless tobacco use among adults and adolescents in the U.S.
        Am J Public Health. 2006; 96: 897-905
        • Mumford E.A.
        • Levy D.T.
        • Gitchell J.G.
        • Blackman K.O.
        Smokeless tobacco use 1992–2002: trends and measurement in the Current Population Survey-Tobacco Use Supplements.
        Tob Control. 2006; 15: 166-171
        • Howard-Pitney B.
        • Winkleby M.A.
        Chewing tobacco: who uses and who quits?.
        National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. 2002; 92: 250-256
        • USDHHS
        National Survey on Drug Use and Health.
        Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies, Research Triangle Park NC2002
        • Vander Weg M.W.
        • DeBon M.
        • Peterson A.L.
        • Sherrill-Mittleman D.
        • Klesges R.C.
        • Relyea G.E.
        Prevalence and correlates of lifetime smokeless tobacco use in female military recruits.
        Nicotine Tob Res. 2005; 7: 431-441
        • Shiffman S.
        • Waters A.
        • Hickcox M.
        The nicotine dependence syndrome scale: a multidimensional measure of nicotine dependence.
        Nicotine Tob Res. 2004; 6: 327-348
        • Flaherty B.P.
        Assessing reliability of categorical substance use measures with latent class analysis.
        Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002; 68: S7-S20
        • Lo Y.
        • Mendell N.
        • Rubin D.
        Testing the number of components in a normal mixture.
        Biometrika. 2001; 88: 767-778
        • Muthén B.O.
        • Muthén L.K.
        Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes.
        Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000; 24: 882-891
        • Maxwell Jr, J.C.
        The Maxwell report: the smokeless tobacco industry in 2003.
        John C. Maxwell Jr, Richmond VA2004
        • Riley W.T.
        • Kaugars G.E.
        • Grisius T.M.
        • Page D.G.
        • Burns J.C.
        • Svirsky J.A.
        Adult smokeless tobacco use and age of onset.
        Addict Behav. 1996; 21: 135-138
        • Rodu B.
        • Phillips C.V.
        Switching to smokeless tobacco as a smoking cessation method: evidence from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.
        Harm Reduct J. 2008; 5: 18
        • Tomar S.L.
        Epidemiologic perspectives on smokeless tobacco marketing and population harm.
        Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33: S387-S397
        • Edmundson E.W.
        • Glover E.D.
        • Holbert D.
        • Alston P.P.
        • Schroeder K.L.
        Personality profiles associated with smokeless tobacco use patterns.
        Addict Behav. 1988; 13: 219-223