Brief report| Volume 37, ISSUE 5, P441-444, November 2009

Download started.


Sensitivity of Self-Report Mammography Use in Older Women

  • Benjamin M. Craig
    Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Benjamin M. Craig, PhD, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, MRC-CANCONT, Tampa FL 33612-9416
    Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida

    Department of Economics, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
    Search for articles by this author
  • Gwendolyn P. Quinn
    Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida

    Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
    Search for articles by this author
  • Susan T. Vadaparampil
    Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida

    Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
    Search for articles by this author


      Recent survey evidence indicates a decline in mammography use among older women.


      The objective of this study was to detect sensitivity of self-reported mammography use and pose evidence-based suggestions to increase survey accuracy.


      Using the 1991–2006 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, 15,357 women, aged ≥65 years, were selected based on use of mammography services. The women were interviewed in the community setting at random periods after screening and asked, Have you had a mammogram or breast X-ray since [today's date or previous supplement round interview date] a year ago? Statistical analyses were conducted between March 11 and April 28 of 2008. This study tested whether sensitivity (i.e., probability of an affirmative response) was dependent on length of the recall period and on respondent demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.


      Overall, 90.4% of the older women self-reported use; however, sensitivity decreased as the recall period lengthened (90% at 6 months, 80% at 12 months). This time effect was significantly higher among older, economically disadvantaged women. Sensitivity also decreased an additional 13.8% if the event occurred in the previous calendar year, and 3.5% if conducted in a non-English language or by proxy.


      Greatest sensitivity occurred during the 6-month period after service without straddling calendar years. These findings may aid the tailoring of future surveys for older adults, improving the recall of preventive services.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Breen N.
        • Cronin K.
        • Meissner H.
        • et al.
        Reported drop in mammography: is this cause for concern?.
        Cancer. 2007; 109: 2405-2408
        • Feldstein A.
        • Vogt T.
        • Aickin M.
        • Hu W.
        Mammography screening rates decline: a person-time approach to evaluation.
        Prev Med. 2006; 43: 178-182
        • Mahnken J.D.
        • Freeman D.H.
        • Dinuzzo A.R.
        • Freeman J.L.
        Mammography use among older Mexican-American women: correcting for over-reports of breast cancer screening.
        Women Health. 2007; 45: 53-64
        • Bancej C.
        • Maxwell C.
        • Snider J.
        Inconsistent self-reported mammography history: findings from the National Population Health Survey Longitudinal Cohort.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2004; 4: 32
        • Bhandari A.
        • Wagner T.
        Self-reported utilization of health care services: improving measurement and accuracy.
        Med Care Res Rev. 2006; 63: 217-235
        • Caplan L.
        • McQueen D.
        • Qualters J.
        • Leff M.
        • Garrett C.
        • Calonga N.
        Validity of women's self-reports of cancer screening test utilization in a managed care population.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003; 12: 1182-1187
        • Champion V.
        • Menon U.
        • McQuillen D.
        • Scott C.
        Validity of self-reported mammography in low-income African-American women.
        Am J Prev Med. 1998; 14: 111-117
        • Consedine N.
        • Horton D.
        • Magai C.
        • Kukafka R.
        Breast screening in response to gain, loss, and empowerment framed messages among diverse, low-income women.
        J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007; 18: 550-566
        • Fiscella K.
        • Franks P.
        • Meldrum S.
        Estimating racial/ethnic disparity in mammography rates: it all depends on how you ask the question.
        Prev Med. 2004; 39: 399-403
        • Fiscella K.
        • Holt K.
        • Meldrum S.
        • Franks P.
        Disparities in preventive procedures: comparisons of self-report and Medicare claims data.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2006; 6: 122
        • Hiatt R.
        • Perez-Stable E.
        • Quesenberry C.
        • Sabogal F.
        • Otero-Sabogal R.
        • McPhee S.
        Agreement between self-reported early cancer detection practices and medical audits among Hispanic and non-Hispanic White Health Plan Members in Northern California.
        Prev Med. 1995; 24: 278-285
        • Johnson T.
        • O'Rourke D.
        • Burris J.
        • Warnecke R.
        An investigation of the effects of social desirability on the validity of self-reports of cancer screening behaviors.
        Med Care. 2005; 43: 565-573
        • May D.
        • Trontell A.
        Mammography use by elderly women: a methodological comparison of two national data sources.
        Ann Epidemiol. 1998; 8: 439-444
        • Mcgovern P.
        • Lurie N.
        • Margolis K.
        • Slater J.
        Accuracy of self-report of mammography and Pap smear in a low-income urban population.
        Am J Prev Med. 1998; 14: 201-208
        • McPhee S.
        • Nguyen T.
        • Shema S.
        • et al.
        Validation of recall of breast and cervical cancer screening by women in an ethnically diverse population.
        Prev Med. 2002; 35: 463-473
        • Norman S.
        • Localio A.
        • Zhou L.
        • et al.
        Validation of self-reported screening mammography histories among women with and without breast cancer.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 158: 264-271
        • Paskett E.
        • Tatum C.
        • Mack D.
        • Hoen H.
        • Case L.
        • Velez R.
        Validation of self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening tests among low-income minority women.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996; 5: 721-726
        • Randolph W.
        • Mahnken J.
        • Goodwin J.
        • Freeman J.
        Using Medicare data to estimate the prevalence of breast cancer screening in older women: comparison of different methods to identify screening mammograms.
        Health Serv Res. 2002; 37: 1643-1657
        • Rivera S.
        • Vernon S.
        • Tiro J.
        • et al.
        Test-retest of self-reported mammography in women veterans.
        Prev Med. 2006; 42: 320-326
        • Kagay C.
        • Quale C.
        • Smith-Bindman R.
        Screening mammography in the American elderly.
        Am J Prev Med. 2006; 31: 142-149
        • Suarez L.
        • Goldman D.
        • Weiss N.
        Validity of Pap smear and mammogram self-reports in a low-income Hispanic population.
        Am J Prev Med. 1995; 11: 94-98
        • Tumiel-Berhalter L.
        • Finney M.
        • Jaen C.
        Self-report and primary care medical record documentation of mammography and Pap smear utilization among low-income women.
        J Natl Med Assoc. 2004; 94: 1632-1639
        • Vernon S.
        • Briss P.
        • Tiro J.
        • Warnecke R.
        Some methodologic lessons learned from cancer screening research.
        Cancer. 2004; 101: 1131-1145
        • Armstrong K.
        • Long J.
        • Shea J.
        Measuring adherence to mammography screening recommendations among low-income women.
        Prev Med. 2004; 38: 754-760
      1. SAS Institute Inc. SAS 9.1.3 Help and Documentation. Cary NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2002−2004.

      2. StataCorp. 2005. Stata Statistical Software: Release 9. College Station TX: StataCorp LP.