Current issue| Volume 40, ISSUE 3, P382-385, March 2011

Front-of-Package Food and Beverage Labeling

New Directions for Research and Regulation
  • Jennifer L. Pomeranz
    Address correspondence to: Jennifer L. Pomeranz, JD, MPH, Yale Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, Yale University, 309 Edwards Street, Box 208369, New Haven CT 06520-8369
    Yale Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
    Search for articles by this author
      Nutrition-related labeling of packaged food is of increasing interest in the U.S. and internationally due to concerns about obesity and other nutrition-related diseases. Obesity has reached epidemic proportions globally, and nutrition-related labeling is considered to be a method to both inform consumers and encourage product reformulation. In the U.S., there are labeling regulations guiding the use of claims on food and beverage (hereinafter “food”) packaging, but manufacturers still have great leeway in making such claims. The food industry also developed various front-of-package (FOP; see Table 1 for a list of acronym definitions) icons and schemes in an effort to draw attention to specific qualities of their products. The proliferation of icons and schemes, and both authorized and questionable claims, stimulated several entities within the federal government to reassess labeling regulations to ensure that labels provide factual, non-misleading information to assist consumers.
      Table 1Acronym definitions
      FDA Food and Drug Administration
      FDCA Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938
      FOP Front of Package
      FTC Federal Trade Commission
      NLEA Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990
      QHC Qualified Health Claim
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”)
        New front-of-package labeling initiative.
      1. Transcript for FDA's media briefing on front-of-pack labeling. FDA position on front-of-package labeling. October 20, 2009. Remarks of Dr. Margaret Hamburg, Commissioner of Food and Drug Administration.
      2. Rubin v. Coors Brewing Co., 514 U.S. 476,481 (1995).

      3. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio, 471 U.S. 626, 651 (1985).

      4. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission of New York, 447 U.S. 557, 564 (1980).

        • FDA
        Background information on point of purchase labeling.
      5. Hawley K, Roberto CA, Bragg MA, Liu P, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD. The science on front of package food labels [working paper, 2011].

        • Raaij Jv
        • Hendriksen M.
        • Verhagen H.
        Potential for improvement of population diet through reformation of commonly eaten foods.
        Public Health Nutr. 2008; 12: 325-330
      6. Vyth EL, Steenhuis IHM, Roodenburg AJC, Brug J, Seidell JC. Front-of-pack nutrition label stimulates healthier product development: a quantitative analysis [working paper, 2010].

      7. Notices. Federal Register. Vol. 75, No. 82. April 29, 2010: 22602-22606
      8. Harris JL, Thompson J, Schwartz MB. Nutrient claims on children's cereals: what do they mean to parents and do they influence willingness to buy? [working paper, 2010].

        • White House Task Force on Childhood Obesity Report to the President
        Solving the problem of childhood obesity within a generation.
        May 2010
        • Drewnowski A.
        • Moskowitz H.
        • Reisner M.
        • Krieger B.
        Testing consumer perception of nutrient content claims using conjoint analysis.
        Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13: 688-694
        • Elliot C.
        Assessing “fun foods”: nutritional content and analysis of supermarket foods targeted at children.
        Obesity Reviews. 2008; 9: 368-377
        • Harris J.L.
        • Schwartz M.B.
        • Brownell K.D.
        Cereal F.A.C.T.S.: nutrition and marketing ratings of children's cereals.
      9. 21 CFR 101.1 et seq.

      10. Pearson v. Shalala, 164 F.3d 650, 658–659 (D.C. Cir. 1999).

        • FDA
        Guidance for industry: evidence-based review system for the scientific evaluation of health claims—final. January 2009.
      11. U.S. Government Accountability Office. Food labeling. FDA needs to better leverage resources, improve oversight, and effectively use available data to help consumers select healthy foods. Report to the Chair, Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, 2008 Sept.

        • Nestle M.
        • Ludwig D.S.
        Front-of-package food labels: public health or propaganda?.
        JAMA. 2010; 303: 771-772
        • Hawkes C.
        Nutrition labels and health claims: the global regulatory environment.
        WHO, 2004
      12. In re R.M.J., 455 U.S. 191, 203 (1982).

        • Derby B.
        • Levy A.
        Effects of strength of science disclaimers on the communication impacts of health claims.
        ([working paper, 2005])
        • Choinière C.J.
        • Verrill L.
        Qualified Health Claims II. Experimental study of qualified health claims: consumer inferences about monounsaturated fatty acids from olive oil, EPA and DHA omega-3 fatty acids, and green tea.
        • Verhagen H.
        • Vos E.
        • Francl S.
        • Heinonen M.
        • van Loveren H.
        Status of nutrition and health claims in Europe.
        Arch Biochem Biophys. 2010; 501: 6-15
        • Vyth E.L.
        • Steenhuis I.H.M.
        • Mallant S.F.
        • et al.
        A front-of-pack nutrition logo: a quantitative and qualitative process evaluation in the Netherlands.
        J Health Commun. 2009; 14: 631-645
        • Johnson R.K.
        • Appel L.J.
        • Brands M.
        • et al.
        Dietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.
        Circulation. 2009; 120: 1011-1020
        • Pomeranz J.L.
        • Brownell K.D.
        Advancing public health obesity policy through state attorneys general.
        Am J Public Health. 2011; (In press)