Advertisement
Research article| Volume 41, ISSUE 3, P291-296, September 2011

Child and Adolescent Exposure to Food and Beverage Brand Appearances During Prime-Time Television Programming

      Background

      The food industry disproportionately markets to young people through product placements. Children and adolescents may be more susceptible to these disguised persuasive attempts.

      Purpose

      Quantify incidence and youth exposure to food and beverage brand appearances within shows on prime-time TV.

      Methods

      Data on the number of food, beverage, and restaurant brand appearances within shows during prime-time programming in 2008 were purchased from Nielsen and analyzed by product category and company in 2010. Exposure to these brand appearances by children, adolescents, and adults were examined and compared with exposure to prime-time TV advertisements for the same categories and companies using additional Nielsen data.

      Results

      Food, beverage, and restaurant brands appeared a total of 35,000 times within prime-time TV programming examined by Nielsen in 2008. Regular soft drinks, traditional restaurants (i.e., not quickserve), and energy/sports drinks made up 60% of all brand appearances. Young people viewed relatively few of these appearances with one notable exception. Coca-Cola products were seen 198 times by the average child and 269 times by the average adolescent during prime-time shows over the year, accounting for 70% of child exposure and 61% of adolescent exposure to brand appearances. One show, American Idol, accounted for more than 95% of these exposures. Exposure of children to Coca-Cola products through traditional advertisements was much less common.

      Conclusions

      Brand appearances for most food industry companies, except for Coca-Cola, are relatively rare during prime-time programming with large youth audiences. Coca-Cola has pledged to refrain from advertising to children, yet the average child views almost four Coke appearances on prime-time TV every week. This analysis reveals a substantial, potential loophole in current food industry self-regulatory pledges to advertise only better-for-you foods to children.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hastings G.
        • Stead M.
        • McDermott L.
        • et al.
        Review of research on the effects of food promotion to children.
        Center for Social Marketing, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK2003
        • Harris J.L.
        • Pomeranz J.L.
        • Lobstein T.
        • Brownell K.D.
        A crisis in the marketplace: how food marketing contributes to childhood obesity and what can be done.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 2009; 30: 211-225
        • IOM
        Food marketing to children and youth: threat or opportunity?.
        The National Academic Press, Washington DC2006
        • Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
        Marketing food to children and adolescents: a review of industry expenditures, activities, and self-regulation.
        • Wiles M.A.
        • Danielova A.
        The worth of product placement in successful films: an event study analysis.
        J Marketing. 2009; 73: 44-63
        • Wilde P.
        Self-regulation and the response to concerns about food and beverage marketing to children in the U.S..
        Nutr Rev. 2009; 67: 155-166
        • Stanley T.L.
        That's advertainment.
        • Auty S.
        • Lewis C.
        Exploring children's choice: the reminder effect of product placement.
        Psychol Marketing. 2004; 21: 697-713
        • Ulaby N.
        Taking product placement another step.
        • Hawkes C.
        Marketing food to children: the global regulatory environment.
        WHO, Geneva2004
        • Sutherland L.A.
        • MacKenzie T.
        • Purvis L.A.
        • Dalton M.
        Prevalence of food and beverage brands in movies: 1996–2005.
        Pediatrics. 2010; 125: 468-474
        • La Ferle C.
        • Edwards S.M.
        Product placement: how brands appear on television.
        J Advertising. 2006; 35: 65-86
        • Council of Better Business Bureaus (CBBB)
        The children's food and beverage advertising initiative in action.
        • Kunkel D.
        • McKinley C.
        • Wright P.
        The impact of industry self-regulation on the nutritional quality of foods advertised on television to children.
        Children Now, 2009
        • Holt D.H.
        • Ippolito P.M.
        • Desrochers D.M.
        • Kelley C.R.
        Children's exposure to TV advertising in 1977 and 2004: information for the obesity debate.
        • Powell L.M.
        • Szczypka G.
        • Chaloupka F.J.
        Exposure to food advertising on television among U.S. children.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007; 161: 553-560
        • Powell L.M.
        • Szczpka G.
        • Chaloupka F.J.
        Trends in exposure to television food advertisements among children and adolescents in the U.S..
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010; 164: 794-802
        • Wang Y.C.
        • Bleich S.N.
        • Gortmaker S.L.
        Increasing caloric contribution from sugar-sweetened beverages and 100% fruit juices among U.S. children and adolescents.
        Pediatrics. 2008; 121: e1604-e1614
        • Malik V.
        • Schulze M.
        • Hu F.
        Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 84: 274-288
        • Vartanian L.
        • Schwartz M.B.
        • Brownell K.D.
        Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Public Health. 2007; 97: 667-675
        • Andreyeva T.
        • Kelly I.R.
        • Harris J.L.
        Exposure to food advertising on television: associations with children's fast food and soft drink consumption and obesity.
        Econ Hum Biol. 2011; 9: 221-233
        • Schechner S.
        “American Idol” Finale Draws Smaller Audience.
        Wall Street Journal, 28 May 2010
        • Friedman W.
        Coke gets millions in media value from “Idol.”.
        Media Post, 15 January 2010
        • Interbrand
        Best Global Brands 2010.
        • Product Placement News
        TV product placement draws concern.
      1. Federal Communications Commission. 47 C.F.R § 73.1212. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 47, Volume 4, Revised as of October 1, 2001. Washington DC.

        • Commercial Alert
        Complaint, request for investigation and petition for rulemaking to establish adequate disclosure of product placement on television [formal complaint submitted to the Federal Communications Commission, 20 September 2003].
        Commercial Alert, Portland OR2003
        • Product Placement News
        TV product placement draws concern.