Advertisement

Binge Drinking Intensity

A Comparison of Two Measures

      Background

      Binge drinking (≥4 drinks for women; ≥5 drinks for men, per occasion) is responsible for more than half of the estimated 80,000 U.S. deaths annually and three-quarters of the $223.5 billion in costs in 2006. Binge drinking prevalence is assessed more commonly than binge drinking intensity (i.e., number of drinks consumed per binge episode). Risk of binge drinking–related harm increases with intensity, and thus it is important to monitor. The largest number of drinks consumed is assessed in health surveys, but its usefulness for assessing binge intensity is unknown.

      Purpose

      To assess the agreement between two potential measures of binge drinking intensity: the largest number of drinks consumed by binge drinkers (maximum-drinks) and the total number of drinks consumed during their most recent binge episode (drinks-per-binge).

      Methods

      Data were analyzed from 7909 adult binge drinkers from 14 states responding to the 2008 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) binge drinking module. Mean and median drinks-per-binge from that module were compared to mean and median maximum-drinks. Analyses were conducted in 2010–2011.

      Results

      Mean (8.2) and median (5.9) maximum-drinks were strongly correlated with mean (7.4) and median (5.4) drinks-per-binge (r=0.57). These measures were also strongly correlated across most sociodemographic and drinking categories overall and within states.

      Conclusions

      The maximum-drinks consumed by binge drinkers is a practical method for assessing binge drinking intensity and thus can be used to plan and evaluate Community Guide–recommended strategies for preventing binge drinking (e.g., increasing the price of alcoholic beverages and regulating alcohol outlet density).
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • CDC
        Alcohol-related disease impact (ARDI) application .
        • Bouchery E.E.
        • Harwood H.J.
        • Sacks J.J.
        • Simon C.J.
        • Brewer R.D.
        Economic costs of excessive alcohol consumption in the U.S., 2006.
        Am J Prev Med. 2011; 41: 516-524
        • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
        NIAAA Council approves binge drinking definition.
        NIAAA Newslett. 2004; : 3
        • Wechsler H.
        • Dowdall G.W.
        • Davenport A.
        • Rimm E.B.
        A gender-specific measure of binge drinking among college students.
        Am J Public Health. 1995; 85: 982-985
        • Hingson R.W.
        • Zha W.
        Age of drinking onset, alcohol use disorders, frequent heavy drinking, and unintentionally injuring oneself and others after drinking.
        Pediatrics. 2009; 123: 1477-1484
        • Hingson R.W.
        • Edwards E.M.
        • Heeren T.
        • Rosenbloom D.
        Age of drinking onset and injuries, motor vehicle crashes, and physical fights after drinking and when not drinking.
        Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009; 33: 783-790
        • Naimi T.S.
        • Brewer R.D.
        • Mokdad A.
        • Denny C.
        • Serdula M.K.
        • Marks J.S.
        Binge drinking among U.S. adults.
        JAMA. 2003; 289: 70-75
        • Chikritzhs T.N.
        • Jonas H.A.
        • Stockwell T.R.
        • Heale P.F.
        • Dietze P.M.
        Mortality and life-years lost due to alcohol: a comparison of acute and chronic causes.
        Med J Aust. 2001; 174: 281-284
        • Wechsler H.
        • Nelson T.F.
        Relationship between level of consumption and harms in assessing drink cut-points for alcohol research: commentary on “Many college freshmen drink at levels far beyond the binge threshold” by White et al.
        Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006; 30: 922-927
        • Naimi T.S.
        • Nelson D.E.
        • Brewer R.D.
        The intensity of binge alcohol consumption among U.S. adults.
        Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38: 201-207
        • CDC
        Vital signs: binge drinking prevalence, frequency, and intensity among adults—U.S., 2010.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012; 61: 14-19
        • Greenfield T.K.
        • Nayak M.B.
        • Bond J.
        • Ye Y.
        • Midanik L.T.
        Maximum quantity consumed and alcohol-related problems: assessing the most alcohol drunk with two measures.
        Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006; 30: 1576-1582
        • CDC
        Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey questionnaire, 2005–present.
        (Atlanta GA)
        • Gmel G.
        • Daeppen J.B.
        Recall bias for seven-day recall measurement of alcohol consumption among emergency department patients: implications for case-crossover designs.
        J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007; 68: 303-310
        • Stockwell T.
        • Donath S.
        • Cooper-Stanbury M.
        • Chikritzhs T.
        • Catalano P.
        • Mateo C.
        Under-reporting of alcohol consumption in household surveys: a comparison of quantity-frequency, graduated-frequency and recent recall.
        Addiction. 2004; 99: 1024-1033
        • Delnevo C.D.
        • Gundersen D.A.
        • Hagman B.T.
        Declining estimated prevalence of alcohol drinking and smoking among young adults nationally: artifacts of sample undercoverage?.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 167: 15-19
        • Blumberg S.J.
        • Luke J.V.
        • Ganesh N.
        • Davern M.E.
        • Boudreaux M.H.
        • Soderberg K.
        Wireless substitution: State-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January 2007–June 2010.
        Natl Health Stat Rep. 2011; : 1-26
        • Nelson D.E.
        • Naimi T.S.
        • Brewer R.D.
        • Roeber J.
        U.S. state alcohol sales compared to survey data, 1993-2006.
        Addiction. 2010; 105: 1589-1596
        • Task Force on Community Prevention Services
        Preventing excessive alcohol consumption.
        • Elder R.W.
        • Lawrence B.
        • Ferguson A.
        • et al.
        • Task Force on Community Preventive Services
        The effectiveness of tax policy interventions for reducing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms.
        Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38: 217-229
        • Task Force on Community Preventive Services
        Increasing alcohol beverage taxes is recommended to reduce excessive alcohol consumption and related harms.
        Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38: 230-232