Advertisement

Problem Behavior and Urban, Low-Income Youth

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Positive Action in Chicago

      Background

      Youth problem behaviors remain a public health issue. Youth in low-income, urban areas are particularly at risk for engaging in aggressive, violent, and disruptive behaviors.

      Purpose

      To evaluate the effects of a school-based social–emotional learning and health promotion program on problem behaviors and related attitudes among low-income, urban youth.

      Design

      A matched-pair, cluster RCT.

      Setting/participants

      Participants were drawn from 14 Chicago Public Schools over a 6-year period of program delivery with outcomes assessed for a cohort of youth followed from Grades 3 to 8. Data were collected from Fall 2004 to Spring 2010, and analyzed in Spring 2012.

      Intervention

      The Positive Action program includes a scoped and sequenced K–12 classroom curriculum with six components: self-concept, social and emotional positive actions for managing oneself responsibly, and positive actions directed toward physical and mental health, honesty, getting along with others, and continually improving oneself. The program also includes teacher, counselor, family, and community training as well as activities directed toward schoolwide climate development.

      Main outcome measures

      Youth reported on their normative beliefs in support of aggression and on their bullying, disruptive, and violent behaviors; parents rated youths’ bullying behaviors and conduct problems; schoolwide data on disciplinary referrals and suspensions were obtained from school records.

      Results

      Multilevel growth-curve modeling analyses conducted on completion of the trial indicated that Positive Action mitigated increases over time in (1) youth reports of normative beliefs supporting aggressive behaviors and of engaging in disruptive behavior and bullying (girls only) and (2) parent reports of youth bullying behaviors (boys only). At study end-point, students in Positive Action schools also reported a lower rate of violence-related behavior than students in control schools. Schoolwide findings indicated positive program effects on both disciplinary referrals and suspensions. Program effect sizes ranged from −0.26 to −0.68.

      Conclusions

      These results extend evidence of the effectiveness of the Positive Action program to low-income, minority, urban school settings, and to middle school–aged youth.

      Trial registration

      This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01025674.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Williams K.
        • Rivera L.
        • Neighbours R.
        • Reznik V.
        Youth violence prevention comes of age: research, training and future directions.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 2007; 28: 195-211
      1. Cook PJ, Laub JH. After the epidemic: recent trends in youth violence in the U.S. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2001. NBER Working Paper No. 8571.

        • Dahlberg L.L.
        Youth violence in the U.S.: major trends, risk factors, and prevention approaches.
        Am J Prev Med. 1998; 14: 259-272
        • Nansel T.R.
        • Overpeck M.
        • Pilla R.S.
        • Ruan W.
        • Simons-Morton B.
        • Scheidt P.
        Bullying behaviors among U.S. youth.
        JAMA. 2001; 285: 2094-2100
        • Gustavson C.
        • Ståhlberg O.
        • Sjödin A.K.
        • Forsman A.
        • Nilsson T.
        • Anckarsäter H.
        Age at onset of substance abuse: a crucial covariate of psychopathic traits and aggression in adult offenders.
        Psychiatry Res. 2007; 153: 195-198
        • Merline A.C.
        • O'Malley P.M.
        • Schulenberg J.E.
        • Bachman J.G.
        • Johnston L.D.
        Substance use among adults 35 years of age: prevalence, adulthood predictors, and impact of adolescent substance use.
        Am J Public Health. 2004; 94: 96-102
        • DuRant R.H.
        • Smith J.A.
        • Kreiter S.R.
        • Krowchuk D.P.
        The relationship between early age of onset of initial substance use and engaging in multiple health risk behaviors among young adolescents.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999; 153: 286-291
        • Ikeda R.M.
        • Simon T.R.
        • Swahn M.
        The prevention of youth violence: the rationale for and characteristics of four evaluation projects.
        Am J Prev Med. 2001; 20: 15-21
        • Hallfors D.D.
        • Waller M.W.
        • Bauer D.
        • Ford C.A.
        • Halpern C.T.
        Which comes first in adolescence—sex and drugs or depression?.
        Am J Prev Med. 2005; 29: 163-170
        • Eaton D.K.
        • Kann L.
        • Kinchen S.
        • et al.
        Youth risk behavior surveillance—U.S., 2005.
        J Sch Health. 2006; 76: 353-372
        • Afshar P.
        • Kenny M.C.
        Violence in schools, cross-national and cross-cultural perspectives.
        J Psychol Trauma. 2008; 6: 87-89
        • Flay B.R.
        Positive youth development requires comprehensive health promotion programs.
        Am J Health Behav. 2002; 26: 407-424
        • Flay B.R.
        • Graumlich S.
        • Segawa E.
        • Burns J.L.
        • Holliday M.Y.
        Effects of 2 prevention programs on high-risk behaviors among African American youth: a randomized trial.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004; 158: 377-384
        • Wilson S.J.
        • Lipsey M.W.
        School-based interventions for aggressive and disruptive behavior: update of a meta-analysis.
        Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33: S130-S143
        • Tobler N.S.
        • Stratton H.H.
        Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: a meta-analysis of the research.
        J Primary Prev. 1997; 18: 71-128
        • Wilson D.B.
        • Gottfredson D.C.
        • Najaka S.S.
        School-based prevention of problem behaviors: a meta-analysis.
        J Quant Criminol. 2001; 17: 247-272
        • Farahmand F.K.
        • Grant K.E.
        • Polo A.J.
        • Duffy S.N.
        • DuBois D.L.
        School-based mental health and behavioral programs for low-income, urban youth: a systematic and meta-analytic review.
        Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2011; 18: 372-390
        • Durlak J.A.
        • Weissberg R.P.
        • Dymnicki A.B.
        • Taylor R.D.
        • Schellinger K.B.
        The impact of enhancing students social and emotional learning: a meta analysis of school based universal interventions.
        Child Dev. 2011; 82: 405-432
        • Berkowitz M.W.
        • Bier M.C.
        What works in character education: a research-driven guide for educators.
        Character Education Partnership, Washington DC2005 (1–43)
        • Berkowitz M.W.
        • Bier M.C.
        Research-based character education.
        Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2004; 591: 72-85
        • Flay B.R.
        • Allred C.G.
        The Positive Action program: improving academics, behavior, and character by teaching comprehensive skills for successful learning and living.
        in: Lovat T. Toomey R. Clement N. International Research Handbook on Values Education and Student Wellbeing. Springer, Dordrecht2010: 471-501
        • Purkey W.W.
        • Novak J.M.
        Inviting school success: a self-concept approach to teaching, learning, and democratic practice.
        Wadsworth, Florence KY1996
        • Purkey W.W.
        Self concept and school achievement.
        Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood-Cliffs NJ1970
        • DuBois D.L.
        • Flay B.R.
        • Fagen M.C.
        Self-esteem Enhancement Theory: An emerging framework for promoting health across the life-span.
        in: DiClement R.J. Kegler M.C. Crosby R.A. Theories in health promotion practice and research. 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco CA2009: 93-130
        • Flay B.R.
        • Snyder F.
        • Petraitis J.
        The theory of triadic influence.
        in: DiClemente R.J. Kegler M.C. Crosby R.A. Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research. 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco CA2009: 451-510
        • Flay B.R.
        • Petraitis J.
        The theory of triadic influence: a new theory of health behavior with implications for preventive interventions.
        Adv Med Soc. 1994; 4: 19-44
        • Beets M.W.
        • Flay B.R.
        • Vuchinich S.
        • et al.
        Use of a social and character development program to prevent substance use, violent behaviors, and sexual activity among elementary-school students in Hawaii.
        Am J Public Health. 2009; 99: 1438-1445
        • Snyder F.
        • Flay B.
        • Vuchinich S.
        • et al.
        Impact of a social-emotional and character development program on school-level indicators of academic achievement, absenteeism, and disciplinary outcomes: a matched-pair, cluster randomized, controlled trial.
        J Res Educ Effect. 2010; 3: 26-55
        • Li K.-K.
        • Washburn I.
        • DuBois D.L.
        • et al.
        Effects of the Positive Action programme on problem behaviors in elementary school students: a matched-pair, randomized control trial in Chicago.
        Psychol Health. 2011; 26: 187-204
        • Jessor R.
        Problem behavior and development transition in adolescence.
        J Sch Health. 1982; 52: 295-300
        • Vuchinich S.
        • Flay B.R.
        • Aber J.L.
        • Bickman L.
        Person mobility in the design and analysis of cluster-randomized cohort prevention trials.
        Prev Sci. 2012; 13: 300-313
        • Ji P.
        • DuBois D.L.
        • Flay B.R.
        • Brechling V.
        Congratulations, you have been randomized into the control group!: issues to consider when recruiting schools for matched pair randomized control trials of prevention programs.
        J Sch Health. 2008; 78: 131-139
      2. Flay BR. Randomized trial of the Positive Action program in Chicago schools and extension to Grade 8. clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01025674.

      3. Chicago Police Department. Chicago Police Department clear map crime incidents. gis.chicagopolice.org/CLEARMap/startPage.htm.

        • Huesmann L.R.
        • Guerra N.G.
        Children's normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior.
        J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997; 72: 408-419
        • Orpinas P.
        • Frankowski R.
        The aggression scale: a self-report measure of aggressive behavior for young adolescents.
        J Early Adolesc. 2001; 21: 50-67
        • Loeber R.
        • Dishion T.
        Early predictors of male delinquency: a review.
        Psychol Bull. 1983; 94: 68-99
      4. CDC. Methodology of the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System. RR-12. 2004. www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/yrbs/index.htm.

      5. Kamphaus R, Reynolds CR, Hatcher NM. Treatment planning and evaluation with the BASC: the Behavior Assessment System for Children. 1999:563–97.

        • Kenward M.G.
        • Molenberghs G.
        Likelihood based frequentist inference when data are missing at random.
        Stat Sci. 1998; 13: 236-247
        • Lipsey M.W.
        • Wilson D.B.
        Practical meta-analysis.
        Sage, Thousand Oaks CA2001
        • Sánchez-Meca J.
        • Marín-Martínez F.
        • Chacón-Moscoso S.
        Effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis.
        Psychol Methods. 2003; 8: 448-467
        • Raudenbush S.W.
        • Bryk A.S.
        Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Vol 1. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA2002
        • Acock A.
        Working with missing values.
        J Marriage Fam. 2005; 67: 1012-1028
        • Merlo J.
        • Chaix B.
        • Ohlsson H.
        • et al.
        A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena.
        J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2006; 60: 290-297
        • Crick N.R.
        • Grotpeter J.K.
        Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment.
        Child Dev. 1995; 66: 710-722
      6. Lewis KM, Acock A, Bavarian N, et al. Effects of the Positive Action program on social-emotional outcomes in Chicago Public Schools. In: Society for Research in Adolescence. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2012, March.

        • Podsakoff P.M.
        • MacKenzie S.B.
        • Lee J.Y.
        • Podsakoff N.P.
        Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
        J Appl Psychol. 2003; 88: 879-903
        • Tobler A.L.
        • Komro K.A.
        Contemporary options for longitudinal follow-up: lessons learned from a cohort of urban adolescents.
        Eval Prog Plann. 2010; 34: 87-96
        • Brown C.H.
        • Wang W.
        • Kellam S.G.
        • et al.
        Models for testing and evaluating impact in randomized field trials: intent-to-treat analyses for integrating the perspectives of person, place, and time.
        Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008; 95: S74-S104