Advertisement

Menu Labeling Regulations and Calories Purchased at Chain Restaurants

      Background

      The federal menu labeling law will require chain restaurants to post caloric information on menus, but the impact of labeling is uncertain.

      Purpose

      The goal of the current study was to examine the effect of menu labeling on calories purchased, and secondarily, to assess self-reported awareness and use of labels.

      Design

      Single-community pre–post–post cross-sectional study. Data were collected in 2008–2010 and analyzed in 2011–2012.

      Setting/participants

      50 sites from 10 chain restaurants in King County, Washington, selected through stratified, two-stage cluster random sampling. A total of 7325 customers participated. Eligibility criteria were: being an English speaker, aged≥14 years, and having an itemized receipt. The study population was 59% male, 76% white non-Hispanic, and 53% aged<40 years.

      Intervention

      A regulation requiring chain restaurants to post calorie information on menus or menu boards was implemented.

      Main outcome measures

      Mean number of calories purchased.

      Results

      No significant changes occurred between baseline and 4–6 months postregulation. Mean calories per purchase decreased from 908.5 to 870.4 at 18 months post-implementation (38 kcal, 95% CI=−76.9, 0.8, p=0.06) in food chains and from 154.3 to 132.1 (22 kcal, 95% CI=−35.8, −8.5, p=0.002) in coffee chains. Calories decreased in taco and coffee chains, but not in burger and sandwich establishments. They decreased more among women than men in coffee chains. Awareness of labels increased from 18.8% to 61.7% in food chains and from 4.4% to 30.0% in coffee chains (both p<0.001). Among customers seeing calorie information, the proportion using it (about one third) did not change substantially over time. After implementation, food chain customers using information purchased on average fewer calories compared to those seeing but not using (difference=143.2 kcal, p<0.001) and those not seeing (difference=135.5 kcal, p<0.001) such information.

      Conclusions

      Mean calories per purchase decreased 18 months after implementation of menu labeling in some restaurant chains and among women but not men.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Swinburn B.
        • Sacks G.
        • Ravussin E.
        Increased food energy supply is more than sufficient to explain the U.S. epidemic of obesity.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2009; 90: 1453-1456
        • Larson N.
        • Story M.
        Does providing nutrition information at the point of purchase affect consumer behavior?.
        Healthy Eating Res. 2009; (2012(3/28/2012))
        • Burton S.
        • Creyer E.H.
        • Kees J.
        • Huggins K.
        Attacking the obesity epidemic: the potential health benefits of providing nutrition information in restaurants.
        Am J Public Health. 2006; 96: 1669-1675
      1. Center for Science in the Public Interest. State and local menu labeling policies. 2011. cspinet.org/new/pdf/ml_map.pdf.

        • Grossman E.G.
        • Sterkx C.A.
        • Blount E.C.
        • Volberding E.M.
        Compilation of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
        Nutrition labeling of standard menu items at chain restaurants. 2010; (11th Congress, 2nd Session) 518
        • Dumanovsky T.
        • Huang C.Y.
        • Bassett M.T.
        • Silver L.D.
        Consumer awareness of fast-food calorie information in New York City after implementation of a menu labeling regulation.
        Am J Public Health. 2010; 100: 2520-2525
        • Elbel B.
        • Kersh R.
        • Brescoll V.L.
        • Dixon L.B.
        Calorie labeling and food choices: a first look at the effects on low-income people in New York City.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2009; 28: w1110-w1121
        • Roberto C.A.
        • Larsen P.D.
        • Agnew H.
        • Baik J.
        • Brownell K.D.
        Evaluating the impact of menu labeling on food choices and intake.
        Am J Public Health. 2010; 100: 312-318
        • Cinciripini P.M.
        Changing food selections in a public cafeteria.
        Behav Modif. 1984; 8: 520-539
        • Harnack L.J.
        • French S.A.
        Effect of point-of-purchase calorie labeling on restaurant and cafeteria food choices: a review of the literature.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5: 51
        • Balfour D.
        • Moody R.
        • Wise A.
        • Brown K.
        Food choice in response to computer-generated nutrition information provided about meal selections in workplace restaurants.
        J Hum Nutr Diet. 1996; 9: 231-237
        • Albright C.L.
        • Flora J.A.
        • Fortmann S.P.
        Restaurant menu labeling: impact of nutrition information on entree sales and patron attitudes.
        Health Educ Q. 1990; 17: 157-167
        • Chu Y.H.
        • Frongillo E.A.
        • Jones S.J.
        • Kaye G.L.
        Improving patrons' meal selections through the use of point-of-selection nutrition labels.
        Am J Public Health. 2009; 99: 2001-2005
        • Yamamoto J.A.
        • Yamamoto J.B.
        • Yamamoto B.E.
        • Yamamoto L.G.
        Adolescent fast food and restaurant ordering behavior with and without calorie and fat content menu information.
        J Adolesc Health. 2005; 37: 397-402
        • Thorndike A.N.
        • Sonnenberg L.
        • Riis J.
        • Barraclough S.
        • Levy D.E.
        A 2-phase labeling and choice architecture intervention to improve healthy food and beverage choices.
        Am J Public Health. 2012; 102: 527-533
        • Bollinger B.
        • Leslie P.
        • Sorensen A.
        Calorie posting in chain restaurants.
        Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2011; 3: 91-128
        • Dumanovsky T.
        • Huang C.Y.
        • Nonas C.A.
        • Matte T.D.
        • Bassett M.T.
        • Silver L.D.
        Changes in energy content of lunchtime purchases from fast food restaurants after introduction of calorie labelling: cross sectional customer surveys.
        BMJ. 2011; 343: d4464
        • Finkelstein E.A.
        • Strombotne K.L.
        • Chan N.L.
        • Krieger J.
        Mandatory menu labeling in one fast-food chain in King County, Washington.
        Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40: 122-127
        • Tandon P.S.
        • Zhou C.
        • Chan N.L.
        • et al.
        The impact of menu labeling on fast-food purchases for children and parents.
        Am J Prev Med. 2011; 41: 434-438
      2. King County Board of Health. Board of Health Resolution 0802.2. An amendment relating to the protection of the public health through the nutrition labeling of food. 2008;BOH08–02.2.

      3. CDC. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta GA: DHHS, CDC, 2008–2010.

        • Bates K.
        • Burton S.
        • Howlett E.
        • Huggins K.
        The roles of gender and motivation as moderators of the effects of calorie and nutrient information provision on away-from-home foods.
        J Consumer Aff. 2009; 43: 249-273
        • Bruemmer B.
        • Krieger J.
        • Saelens B.E.
        • Chan N.
        Energy, saturated fat, and sodium were lower in entrées at chain restaurants at 18 months compared with 6 months following the implementation of mandatory menu labeling regulation in King County, Washington.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012; 112: 1169-1176
      4. Boyle M. The accidental hero. Business Week 2009. www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_46/b4155058815908.htm.

      5. Hartford J. Five dollar promotions big for restaurants. 2012. www2.qsrmagazine.com/articles/exclusives/0908/five_dollars-1.phtml.

        • Schwartz J.
        • Riis J.
        • Elbel B.
        • Ariely D.
        Inviting consumers to downsize fast-food portions significantly reduces calorie consumption.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2012; 31: 399-407
        • Bassett M.T.
        • Dumanovsky T.
        • Huang C.
        • et al.
        Purchasing behavior and calorie information at fast-food chains in New York City, 2007.
        Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 1457-1459
        • Howlett E.A.
        • Burton S.
        • Bates K.
        • Huggins K.
        Coming to a restaurant near you? Potential consumer responses to nutrition information disclosure on menus.
        J Consumer Res. 2009; 36: 494-503
        • Milich R.
        • Anderson J.
        • Mills M.
        Effects of visual presentation of caloric values on food buying by normal and obese persons.
        Percept Mot Skills. 1976; 42: 155-162
        • Bleich S.N.
        • Pollack K.M.
        The public’s understanding of daily caloric recommendations and their perceptions of calorie posting in chain restaurants.
        BMC Public Health. 2010; 10: 121
        • Cohn E.G.
        • Larson E.L.
        • Araujo C.
        • Sawyer V.
        • Williams O.
        Calorie postings in chain restaurants in a low-income urban neighborhood: measuring practical utility and policy compliance.
        J Urban Health. 2012; 89: 587-597
        • Rothman R.L.
        • Housam R.
        • Weiss H.
        • et al.
        Patient understanding of food labels: the role of literacy and numeracy.
        Am J Prev Med. 2006; 31: 391-398
        • Krukowski R.A.
        • Harvey-Berino J.
        • Kolodinsky J.
        • Narsana R.T.
        • Desisto T.P.
        Consumers may not use or understand calorie labeling in restaurants.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106: 917-920
        • Burton S.
        • Kees J.
        Flies in the Ointment? Addressing potential impediments to population-based health benefits of restaurant menu labeling initiatives.
        J Public Policy Marketing. 2012; 31: 232-239
        • Liu P.J.
        • Roberto C.A.
        • Liu L.J.
        • Brownell K.D.
        A test of different menu labeling presentations.
        Appetite. 2012; 59: 770-777
        • Temple J.L.
        • Johnson K.M.
        • Archer K.
        • Lacarte A.
        • Yi C.
        • Epstein L.H.
        Influence of simplified nutrition labeling and taxation on laboratory energy intake in adults.
        Appetite. 2011; 57: 184-192
      6. Jargon J. Chain restaurants push healthier fare. online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704381604575005530811257728.html.

        • Saelens B.E.
        • Chan N.L.
        • Krieger J.
        • et al.
        Nutrition labeling regulation impacts on restaurant environments.
        Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43: 505-511
        • Wansink B.
        • van Ittersum K.
        Portion size me: downsizing our consumption norms.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2007; 107: 1103-1106
        • Diliberti N.
        • Bordi P.L.
        • Conklin M.T.
        • Roe L.S.
        • Rolls B.J.
        Increased portion size leads to increased energy intake in a restaurant meal.
        Obes Res. 2004; 12: 562-568
        • Kant A.K.
        • Graubard B.I.
        Eating out in America, 1987-2000: trends and nutritional correlates.
        Prev Med. 2004; 38: 243-249