Advertisement

Conscious Consideration of Herd Immunity in Influenza Vaccination Decisions

      Background

      Influenza vaccination decisions may be influenced by perceived risk reduction related to herd immunity.

      Purpose

      This paper examines how free-riding (i.e., foregoing vaccination because of reduced risk perceptions related to herd immunity) or protective benefits to the community affect vaccination decisions.

      Methods

      A survey of a nationally representative panel of U.S. adults (N=442 respondents; data collected and analyzed during 2012) asked about how respondents made vaccination decisions, including whether and how vaccination among the members of respondents’ social networks influenced their own vaccination decisions.

      Results

      Most individuals (61%) reported that vaccination in the social network would not influence their decision. Among those perceiving being influenced by vaccination in their social network, most stated that an increase in network vaccination coverage would make them more likely to get vaccinated, rather than less. Overall, only 6% (28 of 442) gave a response consistent with the reduced-risk logic of herd immunity, which was more common among those stating that they would be less likely to get vaccinated (emphasizing free-riding) than among those more likely to get vaccinated (emphasizing social protection; 33% vs 11%, two-sided, p=0.0005). The reduced-risk logic of herd immunity, and more specifically free-riding, is consciously considered by relatively few individuals. Far more common are social influences bolstering personal vaccination, such as peer pressure and social learning (6% vs 11%, two-sided, p=0.015).

      Conclusions

      Interventionists may be more successful by capitalizing on existing social-influence considerations than by trying to combat the conscious lure of free-riding.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. CDC. March flu vaccination coverage. U.S., 2011‐12 Influenza Season. 2012. www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/vaccination/nfs-survey-march2012.htm.

        • Gidengil C.A.
        • Parker A.M.
        • Zikmund-Fisher B.J.
        Trends in risk perceptions and vaccination intentions: a longitudinal study of the first year of the H1N1 pandemic.
        Am J Public Health. 2012; 102: 672-679
        • Fine P.E.
        Herd immunity: history, theory, practice.
        Epidemiol Rev. 1993; 15: 265-302
        • Funk S.
        • Salathe M.
        • Jansen V.A.
        Modelling the influence of human behaviour on the spread of infectious diseases: a review.
        J R Soc Interface. 2010; 7: 1247-1256
        • Vardavas R.
        • Breban R.
        • Blower S.
        Can influenza epidemics be prevented by voluntary vaccination?.
        PLoS Comput Biol. 2007; 3: e85
        • Hershey J.C.
        • Asch D.A.
        • Thumasathit T.
        • Meszaros J.
        • Waters V.V.
        The roles of altruism, free riding, and bandwagoning in vaccination decisions.
        Organization Behav Hum Decision Proc. 1994; 59: 177-187
        • Vietri J.T.
        • Li M.
        • Galvani A.P.
        • Chapman G.B.
        Vaccinating to help ourselves and others.
        Med Decis Making. 2012; 32: 447-458
        • Downs J.S.
        • de Bruin W.B.
        • Fischhoff B.
        Parents' vaccination comprehension and decisions.
        Vaccine. 2008; 26: 1595-1607
        • Benin A.L.
        • Wisler-Scher D.J.
        • Colson E.
        • Shapiro E.D.
        • Holmboe E.S.
        Qualitative analysis of mothers' decision-making about vaccines for infants: the importance of trust.
        Pediatrics. 2006; 117: 1532-1541
        • Ericsson K.A.
        • Simon H.A.
        Verbal reports as data.
        Psychol Rev. 1980; 87: 215-251
        • Galvani A.P.
        • Reluga T.C.
        • Chapman G.B.
        Long-standing influenza vaccination policy is in accord with individual self-interest but not with the utilitarian optimum.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104: 5692-5697
        • Bhattacharyya S.
        • Bauch C.T.
        "Wait and see" vaccinating behaviour during a pandemic: a game theoretic analysis.
        Vaccine. 2011; 29: 5519-5525
        • Vardavas R.
        • Marcum C.S.
        Modeling influenza vaccination behavior via inductive reasoning games.
        in: Manfredi P. d'Onofrio A. Modeling the interplay between human behavior and the spread of infectious diseases. Springer, New York2012