Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Severity of visual field loss and health-related quality of life.Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 143: 1013-1023
- Impact of visual field loss on health-related quality of life in glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.Ophthalmology. 2008; 115: 941-948
- Preventing and managing visual disability in primary care: clinical applications.JAMA. 2004; 291: 1497-1502
- Impact of unilateral and bilateral vision loss on quality of life.Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89: 360-363
- Vision impairment and hearing loss among community-dwelling older Americans: implications for health and functioning.Am J Public Health. 2004; 94: 823-829
- Risk of falls, injurious falls, and other injuries resulting from visual impairment among older adults with age-related macular degeneration.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 5088-5092
Prevent Blindness America. The economic impact of vision problems. www.preventblindness.org/sites/default/files/national/documents/EI_introduction.pdf.
- The economic burden of major adult visual disorders in the U.S.Arch Ophthalmol. 2006; 124: 1754-1760
- Economic impact of visual impairment and blindness in the U.S.Arch Ophthalmol. 2007; 125: 544-550
- Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the U.S.Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122: 477-485
- Prevalence of visual impairment in the U.S.JAMA. 2006; 295: 2158-2163
- The prevalence and consequences of vision impairment in later life.Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2004; 20: 185-195
- Fifteen-year cumulative incidence of age-related macular degeneration: the Beaver Dame Eye Study.Ophthalmology. 2007; 114: 253-262
- Are individuals with diabetes seeing better? A long-term epidemiological perspective.Diabetes. 2010; 59: 1853-1860
- Computer vision syndrome: a review. 2005; 50: 253-262
- Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in East Baltimore.N Engl J Med. 1991; 325: 1412-1417
CDC, National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). NHANES—survey questionnaire and exam components, 2007–2008. www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes2007-2008/nhanes07_08.htm.
- Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the U.S.Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122: 532-538
- The methodology of visual field testing with frequency doubling technology in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005-2006.Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2010; 17: 411-421
CDC; National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys: response rates and CPS population totals. www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/response_rates_CPS.htm.
National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition and Examination Survey (NHANES) Ophthalmology Procedures Manual. September 2005. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_05_06/OP.pdf.
National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition and Examination Survey (NHANES) Digital Grading Protocol. January 15, 2005. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_05_06/NHANES_ophthamology_digital_grading_protocol.pdf.
- Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the U.S. population.Arch Ophthalmol. 2011; 129: 75-80
- The effect of optic disc diameter on vertical cup to disc ratio percentiles in a population based cohort: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.Br J Ophthalmol. 2004; 88: 766-770
CDC, National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Analytic note regarding 2007-2010 survey design changes and combing data across other survey cycles. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/analyticnote_2007-2010.pdf.
- Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the U.S., 2005–2008.JAMA. 2010; 304: 649-656
- Criteria for definition of overweight in transition: background and recommendations for the U.S.Am J Clin Nutr. 2000; 72: 1074-1081
- Causes of visual impairment.JAMA. 2003; 290: 2088
- Causes of blindness and visual impairment in a population of older Americans: the Salisbury Eye Elevation Study.Arch Ophthalmol. 2000; 118: 819-825
- Reasons for not seeking eye care among adults aged ≥40 years with moderate-to-severe visual impairment—21 states, 2006-2009.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011; 60: 610-613
- Prevalence of usual-corrected binocular distance visual acuity impairment in Hispanic and non-Hispanic adults.Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2000; 7: 73-83
- Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004.Bull WHO. 2008; 86: 63-70
- Visual impairment and socioeconomic factors.Br J Ophthalmol. 1997; 81: 574-577
- Four-year incidence and progression of visual impairment in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.Am J Ophthalmol. 2010; 149: 713-727
- Prevalence and risk indicators of visual impairment and blindness in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.Ophthalmology. 2004; 111: 1132-1140
- Cause of visual impairment in two older population cross-sections: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2003; 10: 215-225
- The prevalence and risk indicators of uncorrected refractive error and unmet refractive need in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49: 5264-5273
- Factors associated with undercorrected refractive errors in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.Br J Ophthalmol. 2002; 86: 1041-1045
- Prevalence and predictors of undercorrected refractive errors in the Victorian population.Am J Ophthalmol. 1999; 127: 590-596
- Socioeconomic status and visual impairment among urban Americans.Arch Ophthalmol. 1991; 109: 637-641
- Socioeconomic status and blindness.Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85: 1484-1488
- The relation of socioeconomic factors to age-related cataract, maculopathy, and impaired vision: the Beaver Dam Eye Disease Study.Ophthalmology. 1994; 101: 1969-1979