Advertisement

Quality Improvement Activities of Local Health Departments During the 2008–2010 Economic Recession

      Background

      A review of the work of researchers in the field of quality reveals a connection between the use of quality improvement (QI) concepts and improved financial performance. The disconnect between the expanding role of public health and the levels of per capita spending to support this role suggests that local health departments with a change in funding might benefit by employing QI to increase service delivery efficiency.

      Purpose

      To examine the relationship between changes in local health department (LHD) total revenue during the 2008–2010 economic recession and changes in LHD quality improvement activities during the same period.

      Methods

      A matched-pairs study assessed change in revenue and associated change in QI activities at two points of time, 2008 and 2010. The study was completed in 2013. A proportional odds regression model estimated the adjusted ORs, measuring the association between change in QI activities and total revenue change, controlling for demographics, leadership QI training, and accreditation intention.

      Results

      Neither changes in revenue nor changes in expenses predicted change in QI activities in LHDs. Enhanced QI activities were found in LHDs led by a director with a master’s degree, led by directors trained in QI, or those serving medium-sized (50,000–499,000) jurisdictions.

      Conclusions

      This study revealed that neither changes in revenue nor changes in LHD expenses predict enhanced QI activities. Rather, improvements appear to be more related to characteristics of local health department leaders, which suggests areas to focus on for future efforts in public health services improvement.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Shewhart W.A.
        Economic control of quality of manufactured product.
        D. VanNostran Company, New York1931
      1. Juran J. Godfrey A.B. Juran's quality handbook. 5th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York1999
        • Donabedian A.
        Evaluating the quality of medical care.
        Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966; 44: 166-206
        • Deming W.E.
        Out of the crisis.
        MIT Press, Cambridge MA1986
        • Forrester N.E.
        Accelerating patient-care improvement in the ED.
        Healthcare Financial Manage. 2003; 57: 38
        • James B.C.
        • Savitz L.A.
        How Intermountain trimmed health care costs through robust quality improvement efforts.
        Health Aff. 2011; 30: 1185-1191
        • Weech-Maldonado R.
        • Neff G.
        • Mor V.
        The relationship between quality of care and financial performance in nursing homes.
        J Health Care Finance. 2003; 29: 48-60
        • Davis K.
        • Otwell R.
        • Barber J.
        Managing costs through clinical quality improvement.
        Healthcare Financial Manage. 2004; 58: 76-84
        • Cochran C.R.
        Introduction: quality improvement in public sector healthcare organizations.
        J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2004; Summer: 5-11
      2. Institute of Medicine, Committee for the Study of the Future of Public Health. The future of public health. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 1988

      3. CDC. National public health performance standards. 2012. www.cdc.gov/nphpsp/overview.html.

      4. Leonard B. Highlights and conclusions. Proceedings of the conference Adapting Quality Improvement to Public Health; 2007 Feb 7; Cincinnati OH:1–13.

      5. Public Health Accreditation Board. Public health department accreditation background. 2011. www.phaboard.org.

        • Russo P.G.
        Accreditation of public health agencies: a means, not an ed.
        J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007; 13: 329-331
        • Bender K.
        • Benjamin G.
        • Fallon M.M.
        • Jarris P.E.
        • Libbey P.M.
        Exploring accreditation: striving for a consensus model.
        J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007; 14: 334-336
        • Beitsch L.M.
        • Brooks R.G.
        • Menachemi N.
        • Libbey P.M.
        Public health at center stage: new roles, old props.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2006; 25: 911-922
        • Joyce P.G.
        • Pattison S.
        Public budgeting in 2020: return to equilibrium, or continued mismatch between demands and resources?.
        Public Adm Rev. 2010; 70: S24-S32
        • Dilley J.
        • Bekemeier B.
        • Harris J.
        Quality improvement interventions in public health systems: a systematic review.
        Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42: S58-S71
        • National Association of County and City Health Officials
        National Profile of Local Health Departments.
        NACCHO, Washington DC2010 (August 2011)