Feasibility of Retrofitting a University Library with Active Workstations to Reduce Sedentary Behavior


      Libraries are an inherently sedentary environment, but are an understudied setting for sedentary behavior interventions.


      To investigate the feasibility of incorporating portable pedal machines in a university library to reduce sedentary behaviors.


      The 11-week intervention targeted students at a university library. Thirteen portable pedal machines were placed in the library. Four forms of prompts (e-mail, library website, advertisement monitors, and poster) encouraging pedal machine use were employed during the first 4 weeks. Pedal machine use was measured via automatic timers on each machine and momentary time sampling. Daily library visits were measured using a gate counter. Individualized data were measured by survey. Data were collected in fall 2012 and analyzed in 2013.


      Mean (SD) cumulative pedal time per day was 95.5 (66.1) minutes. One or more pedal machines were observed being used 15% of the time (N=589). Pedal machines were used at least once by 7% of students (n=527). Controlled for gate count, no linear change of pedal machine use across days was found (b=−0.1 minutes, p=0.75) and the presence of the prompts did not change daily pedal time (p=0.63). Seven of eight items that assessed attitudes toward the intervention supported intervention feasibility (p<0.05).


      The unique non-individualized approach of retrofitting a library with pedal machines to reduce sedentary behavior seems feasible, but improvement of its effectiveness is needed. This study could inform future studies aimed at reshaping traditionally sedentary settings to improve public health.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Rhodes R.E.
        • Mark R.S.
        • Temmel C.P.
        Adult sedentary behavior: a systematic review.
        Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42: e3-e28
        • Beunza J.J.
        • Martinez-Gonzalez M.A.
        • Ebrahim S.
        • Bes-Rastrollo M.
        • Núñez J.
        • Martínez J.A.
        Sedentary behaviors and the risk of incident hypertension: the SUN Cohort.
        Am J Hypertens. 2007; 20: 1156-1162
        • Ford E.S.
        • Kohl III, H.W.
        • Mokdad A.H.
        • Ajani U.A.
        Sedentary behavior, physical activity, and the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults.
        Obes Res. 2005; 13: 608-614
        • Levine J.A.
        • Lanningham-Foster L.M.
        • McCrady S.K.
        • et al.
        Inter-individual variation in posture allocation: possible role in human obesity.
        Science. 2005; 307: 584-586
        • Levine J.A.
        • McCrady S.K.
        • Boyne S.
        • Smith J.
        • Cargill K.
        • Forrester T.
        Non-exercise physical activity in agricultural and urban people.
        Urban Stud. 2011; 48: 2417-2427
        • Sugiyama T.
        • Healy G.N.
        • Dunstan D.W.
        • Salmon J.
        • Owen N.
        Joint associations of multiple leisure-time sedentary behaviours and physical activity with obesity in Australian adults.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5: 35
        • Salmon J.
        • Bauman A.
        • Crawford D.
        • Timperio A.
        • Owen N.
        The association between television viewing and overweight among Australian adults participating in varying levels of leisure-time physical activity.
        Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000; 24: 600-606
        • Katzmarzyk P.T.
        • Church T.S.
        • Craig C.L.
        • Bouchard C.
        Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009; 41: 998-1005
        • Katzmarzyk P.T.
        • Lee I.M.
        Sedentary behaviour and life expectancy in the U.S.: a cause-deleted life table analysis.
        BMJ Open. 2012; 2 (pii:e000828)
        • Patel A.V.
        • Bernstein L.
        • Deka A.
        • et al.
        Leisure time spent sitting in relation to total mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2010; 172: 419-429
        • Thorp A.A.
        • Healy G.N.
        • Owen N.
        • et al.
        Deleterious associations of sitting time and television viewing time with cardiometabolic risk biomarkers: Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle (AusDiab) study 2004–2005.
        Diabetes Care. 2010; 33: 327-334
        • Warren T.Y.
        • Barry V.
        • Hooker S.P.
        • Sui X.
        • Church T.S.
        • Blair S.N.
        Sedentary behaviors increase risk of cardiovascular disease mortality in men.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010; 42: 879-885
        • Tremblay M.S.
        • Colley R.C.
        • Saunders T.J.
        • Healy G.N.
        • Owen N.
        Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle.
        Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010; 35: 725-740
        • Applegate R.
        The library is for studying: student preferences for study space.
        J Acad Libr. 2009; 35: 341-346
        • Gayton J.T.
        Academic libraries: “social” or “communal?” The nature and future of academic libraries.
        J Acad Libr. 2008; 34: 60-66
        • Leckie G.J.
        • Hopkins J.
        The public place of central libraries: findings from Toronto and Vancouver.
        Libr Quart. 2002; 72: 326-372
        • Kuh G.D.
        • Gonyea R.M.
        The role of the academic library in promoting student engagement in learning.
        Coll Res Libr. 2003; 64: 256-282
        • Matthews C.E.
        • Chen K.Y.
        • Freedson P.S.
        • et al.
        Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the U.S., 2003–2004.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 167: 875-881
        • East Carolina University
        Fact book. East Carolina University, Greenville NC2013
        • Altenburg T.M.
        • Rotteveel J.
        • Dunstan D.W.
        • Salmon J.
        • Chinapaw M.J.
        The effect of interrupting prolonged sitting time with short hourly moderate-intensity cycling bouts on cardiometabolic risk factors in healthy young adults.
        J Appl Physiol. 2013; 115 (1985): 1751-1756
        • Dunstan D.W.
        • Kingwell B.A.
        • Larsen R.
        • et al.
        Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses.
        Diabetes Care. 2012; 35: 976-983
        • Peddie M.C.
        • Bone J.L.
        • Rehrer N.J.
        • Skeaff C.M.
        • Gray A.R.
        • Perry T.L.
        Breaking prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glycemia in healthy, normal-weight adults: a randomized crossover trial.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2013; 98: 358-366
        • Bankoski A.
        • Harris T.B.
        • McClain J.J.
        • et al.
        Sedentary activity associated with metabolic syndrome independent of physical activity.
        Diabetes Care. 2011; 34: 497-503
        • Healy G.N.
        • Dunstan D.W.
        • Salmon J.
        • et al.
        Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk.
        Diabetes Care. 2008; 31: 661-666
        • Carr L.J.
        • Walaska K.A.
        • Marcus B.H.
        Feasibility of a portable pedal exercise machine for reducing sedentary time in the workplace.
        Br J Sports Med. 2012; 46: 430-435
        • Washington-Hoagland C.
        • Clougherty L.
        Faculty and staff use of academic library resources and services: a University of Iowa libraries’ perspective.
        Portal-Libr Acad. 2002; 2: 627-646
        • Glasgow R.E.
        • McKay H.G.
        • Piette J.D.
        • Reynolds K.D.
        The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management?.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2001; 44: 119-127