Advertisement

Menthol Cigarette Smoking among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Adults

Published:September 18, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.044

      Background

      Menthol can mask the harshness and taste of tobacco, making menthol cigarettes easier to use and increasing their appeal among vulnerable populations. The tobacco industry has targeted youth, women, and racial minorities with menthol cigarettes, and these groups smoke menthol cigarettes at higher rates. The tobacco industry has also targeted the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) communities with tobacco product marketing.

      Purpose

      To assess current menthol cigarette smoking by sexual orientation among a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults.

      Methods

      Data were obtained from the 2009–2010 National Adult Tobacco Survey, a national landline and cellular telephone survey of non-institutionalized U.S. adults aged ≥18 years, to compare current menthol cigarette smoking between LGBT (n=2,431) and heterosexual/straight (n=110,841) adults. Data were analyzed during January–April 2014 using descriptive statistics and logistic regression adjusted for sex, age, race, and educational attainment.

      Results

      Among all current cigarette smokers, 29.6% reported usually smoking menthol cigarettes in the past 30 days. Menthol use was significantly higher among LGBT smokers, with 36.3% reporting that the cigarettes they usually smoked were menthol compared to 29.3% of heterosexual/straight smokers (p<0.05); this difference was particularly prominent among LGBT females (42.9%) compared to heterosexual/straight women (32.4%) (p<0.05). Following adjustment, LGBT smokers had greater odds of usually smoking menthol cigarettes than heterosexual/straight smokers (OR=1.31, 95% CI=1.09, 1.57).

      Conclusions

      These findings suggest that efforts to reduce menthol cigarette use may have the potential to reduce tobacco use and tobacco-related disease and death among LGBT adults.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, Pub. L. No. 111-3, 123 Stat. 1776 (Jun. 22, 2009).

        • Lee Y.O.
        • Glantz S.A.
        Menthol: putting the pieces together.
        Tob Control. 2011; 20: ii1-ii7
        • Ferris Wayne G.
        • Connolly G.N.
        Application, function, and effects of menthol in cigarettes: a survey of tobacco industry documents.
        Nicotine Tob Res. 2004; 6: S43-S54
        • Food and Drug Administration
        Preliminary scientific evaluation of the possible public health effects of menthol versus nonmenthol cigarettes.
        Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring MD2014
        • Yerger V.B.
        Menthol’s potential effects on nicotine dependence: a tobacco industry perspective.
        Tob Control. 2011; 20: ii29-ii36
        • Anderson S.J.
        Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions: a review of tobacco industry documents.
        Tob Control. 2011; 20: ii20-ii28
        • Caraballo R.S.
        • Asman K.
        Epidemiology of menthol cigarette use in the United States.
        Tobacco Induc Dis. 2011; 9: S1
        • Gardiner P.S.
        The African Americanization of menthol cigarette use in the United States.
        Nicotine Tob Res. 2004; 6: S55-S65
        • King B.A.
        • Dube S.R.
        • Tynan M.A.
        Current tobacco use among adults in the United States: findings from the National Adult Tobacco Survey.
        Am J Public Health. 2012; 102: e93-e100
      2. Lee JG, Griffin GK, Melvin CL. Tobacco use among sexual minorities in the USA, 1987 to May 2007: a systematic review. Tob Control2009;18(4):275–282.

      3. Moodie-Mills AC, Center for American Progress. Flavored disease and death for minorities: why the FDA must ban menthol cigarettes. Center for American Progress. 2011. americanprogress.org/issues/healthcare/report/2011/05/12/9668/flavored-disease-and-death-for-minorities/.

      4. RJ. Reynolds. Project Scum. 1995. legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/mum76d00.

        • Offen N.
        • Smith E.A.
        • Malone R.E.
        From adversary to target market: the ACT-UP boycott of Philip Morris.
        Tob Control. 2003; 12: 203-207
        • Rath J.M.
        • Villanti A.C.
        • Rubenstein R.A.
        • Vallone D.M.
        Tobacco use by sexual identity among young adults in the United States.
        Nicotine Tob. 2013; 15: 1822-1831
      5. National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Use of menthol cigarettes: in brief. The NSDUH report. 2009. www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k9/134/134MentholCigarettes.htm.

        • Hill S.
        • Amos A.
        • Clifford D.
        • Platt S.
        Impact of tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: review of the evidence.
        Tob Control. 2013; https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051110