Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149: 627-637https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00243
Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al, eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2011. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. www.seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/.
- Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149: 638-658https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00245
- Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149: 659-669https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00244
- Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use—United States, 2012.Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013; 62: 881-888
- Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012; 21: 895-904https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0192
- Costs and cost effectiveness of a health care provider-directed intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening.J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 5370-5375https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6458
- Cost-effectiveness of patient mailings to promote colorectal cancer screening.Med Care. 2010; 48: 553-557https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181dbd8eb
CDC. 2014. Guide to Community Preventive Services. www.thecommunityguide.org/index.html.
- Systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening and follow-up rates (SOS): design, challenges, and baseline characteristics of trial participants.Contemp Clin Trials. 2010; 31: 589-603https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2010.07.012
- An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial.Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158: 301-311https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-00002
- Nonparticipation in a population-based trial to increase colorectal cancer screening.Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42: 390-397https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.11.014
- Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue: a framework for the marriage of health econometrics and cost-effectiveness analysis.Health Econ. 2002; 11: 415-430https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.678
- A guide to cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.Br J Psychiatry. 2005; 187: 106-108https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.187.2.106
- Using the net benefit framework to construct cost-effectiveness acceptability curves: an example using data from a trial of external loop recorders versus Holter monitoring for ambulatory monitoring of “community acquired” syncope.BMC Health Serv Res. 2006; 6: 68https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-68
- Regression Methods for Health Economic Evaluation Workshop Session Guide.University of York, York, UK2010
- Micro-costing quantity data collection methods.Med Care. 2009; 47 (7): S76-S81https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819bc064
- Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.Epidemiol Rev. 2011; 33: 88-100https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxr004
- Automated telephone calls to enhance colorectal cancer screening: economic analysis.Am J Manag Care. 2012; 18: 691-699
- Cost-effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care.Cancer. 2014; 120: 1042-1049https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28535
- Cost-effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use.Cancer. 2008; 112: 779-788https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23232
- Cost effectiveness of interventions to promote screening for colorectal cancer: a randomized trial.J Prev Med Public Health. 2011; 44: 101-110https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2011.44.3.101
- Costs and cost effectiveness of a health care provider-directed intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among Veterans.J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 8877-8883https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.02.6278
- Strategies to improve repeat fecal occult blood testing cancer screening.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014; 23: 134-143https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0795
- Contribution of screening and survival differences to racial disparities in colorectal cancer rates.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012; 21: 728-736https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0023
- Cost-effectiveness of one versus two sample faecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening.Gut. 2013; 62: 727-734https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301917
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quantitative immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening.Gastroenterology. 2011; 141: 1648-1655https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.07.020