Advertisement

Gauging the Effect of U.S. Tobacco Control Policies From 1965 Through 2014 Using SimSmoke

Published:December 07, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.001

      Introduction

      The year 2014 marked the 50th Anniversary of the first Surgeon General’s Report. This paper estimates the effect of tobacco control policies in the U.S. after the 1964 Report using the SimSmoke tobacco control simulation model.

      Methods

      SimSmoke uses National Health Interview Survey data from 1965 through 2012 on smoking prevalence, initiation, and cessation rates, and incorporates policies implemented since 1965. The model projects smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths (SADs) from 1965 through 2065 and is validated against National Health Interview Survey data. Counterfactual scenarios with policies constant since 1965 and with individual policies are estimated. Analysis was conducted in February 2014.

      Results

      SimSmoke generally validated well during the time period from 1965 through 2012. As a result of all policies, smoking prevalence is estimated to have fallen by almost 55% by 2014, with a total of 2 million SADs averted from 1965 through 2014, increasing to 20.1 million SADs by 2065. The Fairness Doctrine is estimated to have reduced adult smoking prevalence by about 24% by 2014 and averted 10.4 million SADs by 2065, while price increases reduced smoking prevalence by 24% by 2014 and averted 7.3 million SADs by 2065. Smoke-free air laws, cessation treatment, and tobacco control spending individually reduced smoking rates by 3%−5.5% by 2014.

      Conclusions

      By 2014, SimSmoke predicts a 53% reduction in smoking rates and almost 2 million SADs averted due to polices implemented since the 1964 Surgeon General’s Report, with most of the health benefit still to occur in future years.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • U.S. DHHS
        Smoking and Health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health.
        U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Atlanta, GA1964 (Report No.: DHHS Publication No. 1103)
        • U.S. DHHS
        The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General.
        U.S. DHHS, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, Atlanta, GA2014
        • Warner K.E.
        • Sexton D.W.
        • Gillespie B.W.
        • Levy D.T.
        • Chaloupka F.J.
        Impact of tobacco control on adult per capita cigarette consumption in the United States.
        Am J Public Health. 2014; 104: 83-89https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301591
        • Holford T.R.
        • Meza R.
        • Warner K.E.
        • et al.
        Tobacco control and the reduction in smoking-related premature deaths in the United States, 1964−2012.
        JAMA. 2014; 311: 164-171https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.285112
      1. Burns D. Garfinkel L. Samet J. Changes in Cigarette-Related Disease Risks and Their Implication for Prevention and Control. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD1997
        • Hughes J.R.
        • Peters E.N.
        • Naud S.
        Relapse to smoking after 1 year of abstinence: a meta-analysis.
        Addict Behav. 2008; 33: 1516-1520https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.05.012
      2. U.S. DHHS. The Health Benefits of Smoking Cessation: A Report of the Surgeon General. DHHS Publication No. CDC 90-8416. Atlanta, GA: U.S. DHHS, Public Health Service, CDC, Office on Smoking and Health; 1990

      3. The Tax Burden on Tobacco: Historical Compilation. Arlington, VA: Orzechowski and Walker; 2012.

      4. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statisitcs Consumer Price Index. www.bls.gov/cpi/#tables. Accessed January 28, 2015.

      5. U.S. DHHS, CDC. State Tobacco Activites Tracking and Evaluation System. www.cdc.gov/tobacco/state_system/. Accessed August 3, 2015.

        • Moskowitz J.M.
        • Lin Z.
        • Hudes E.S.
        The impact of California’s smoking ordinances on worksite smoking policy and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.
        Am J Health Promot. 1999; 13 (iii): 278-281https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-13.5.278
        • Rigotti N.A.
        • Stoto M.A.
        • Schelling T.C.
        Do businesses comply with a no-smoking law? Assessing the self-enforcement approach.
        Prev Med. 1994; 23: 223-229https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1994.1030
        • Shopland D.R.
        • Gerlach K.K.
        • Burns D.M.
        • Hartman A.M.
        • Gibson J.T.
        State-specific trends in smoke-free workplace policy coverage: the current population survey tobacco use supplement, 1993 to 1999.
        J Occup Environ Med. 2001; 43: 680-686https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-200108000-00005
        • Warner K.
        Effects of the antismoking campaign: an update.
        Am J Public Health. 1989; 79: 144-151https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.79.2.144
        • Warner K.E.
        • Murt H.A.
        Premature deaths avoided by the antismoking campaign.
        Am J Public Health. 1983; 73: 672-677https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.73.6.672
        • Levy D.T.
        • Friend K.
        Examining the effects of tobacco treatment policies on smoking rates and smoking related deaths using the SimSmoke computer simulation model.
        Tob Control. 2002; 11: 47-54https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.11.1.47
        • Levy D.
        • Graham A.
        • Mabry P.
        • Abrams D.
        • Orleans C.T.
        Modeling the impact of smoking cessation treatment policies on quit rates.
        Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38(3): S364-S372https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.016
      6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2006.

        • Levy D.T.
        • Friend K.
        • Holder H.
        • Carmona M.
        Effect of policies directed at youth access to smoking: results from the SimSmoke computer simulation model.
        Tob Control. 2001; 10: 108-116https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.10.2.108
        • Holford T.R.
        • Levy D.T.
        • McKay L.A.
        • et al.
        Patterns of birth cohort-specific smoking histories, 1965-2009.
        Am J Prev Med. 2014; 46: e31-e37https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.022
        • Levy D.T.
        • Cummings K.M.
        • Hyland A.
        Increasing taxes as a strategy to reduce cigarette use and deaths: results of a simulation model.
        Prev Med. 2000; 31: 279-286https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2000.0696
        • Levy D.T.
        • Friend K.
        • Polishchuk E.
        Effect of clean indoor air laws on smokers: the clean air module of the SimSmoke computer simulation model.
        Tob Control. 2001; 10: 345-351https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.10.4.345
        • Lewit E.M.
        • Coate D.
        • Grossman M.
        The effects of government regulation on teenage smoking.
        J Law Econ. 1981; 24: 545-569https://doi.org/10.1086/466999
        • Levy D.T.
        • Friend K.
        A computer simulation model of mass media interventions directed at tobacco use.
        Prev Med. 2001; 32: 284-294https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2000.0808
        • Levy D.T.
        • Gitchell J.G.
        • Chaloupka F.
        The effects of tobacco control policies on smoking rates: a tobacco control scorecard.
        J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004; 10: 338-353https://doi.org/10.1097/00124784-200407000-00011
      7. U.S. DHHS. Reducing Tobacco Use: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. DHHS, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2000.

        • Levy D.
        • Rodriguez-Buno R.L.
        • Hu T.W.
        • Moran A.E.
        The potential effects of tobacco control in China: projections from the China SimSmoke simulation model.
        BMJ. 2014; 348: g1134https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1134
        • Levy D.
        • de Almeida L.M.
        • Szklo A.
        The Brazil SimSmoke policy simulation model: the effect of strong tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths in a middle income nation.
        PLoS Med. 2012; 9: e1001336https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001336
        • Currie L.M.
        • Blackman K.
        • Clancy L.
        • Levy D.T.
        The effect of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths in Ireland using the IrelandSS simulation model.
        Tob Control. 2013; 22: e25-e32https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050248
      8. Levy D, Blackman K, Fong GT, Chaloupka F, eds. The role of tobacco control policies in reducing smoking and deaths in the eighteen heavy burden nations: results from the MPOWER SimSmoke Tobacco Control Policy Model. In: eds. Fong G, Chaloupka F, Yurekli A, eds. NCI Monograph: Tobacco Control Policies in Low and Middle Income Nations. Rockville, MD: NCI; in press.

        • Levy D.T.
        • Cho S.I.
        • Kim Y.M.
        • Park S.
        • Suh M.K.
        • Kam S.
        SimSmoke model evaluation of the effect of tobacco control policies in Korea: the unknown success story.
        Am J Public Health. 2010; 100: 1267-1273https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.166900
        • Levy D.T.
        • Benjakul S.
        • Ross H.
        • Ritthiphakdee B.
        The role of tobacco control policies in reducing smoking and deaths in a middle income nation: results from the Thailand SimSmoke simulation model.
        Tob Control. 2008; 17: 53-59https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2007.022319
        • Levy D.T.
        • Blackman K.
        • Currie L.M.
        • Mons U.
        Germany SimSmoke: the effect of tobacco control policies on future smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths in Germany.
        Nicotine Tob Res. 2013; 15: 465-473https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nts158
        • Levy D.T.
        • Boyle R.G.
        • Abrams D.B.
        The role of public policies in reducing smoking: the Minnesota SimSmoke tobacco policy model.
        Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43: S179-S186https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.037
        • Levy D.T.
        • Currie L.
        • Clancy L.
        Tobacco control policy in the UK: blueprint for the rest of Europe?.
        Eur J Public Health. 2013; 23: 201-206https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cks090
        • Levy D.T.
        • Hyland A.
        • Higbee C.
        • Remer L.
        • Compton C.
        The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence in California: results from the California Tobacco Policy Simulation Model.
        Health Policy. 2007; 82: 153-166https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.09.008
        • Levy D.T.
        • Nikolayev N.
        • Mumford E.A.
        Recent trends in smoking and the role of public policies: results from the SimSmoke Tobacco Control Policy Simulation Model.
        Addiction. 2005; 100: 1526-1536https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01205.x
        • Gerlach K.K.
        • Shopland D.R.
        • Hartman A.M.
        • Gibson J.T.
        • Pechacek T.F.
        Workplace smoking policies in the United States: results from a national survey of more than 100,000 workers.
        Tob Control. 1997; 6: 199-206https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.6.3.199
        • Hopkins D.P.
        • Briss P.A.
        • Ricard C.J.
        • et al.
        Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.
        Am J Prev Med. 2001; 20: 16-66https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00297-X
        • Jha P.
        • Ramasundarahettige C.
        • Landsman V.
        • et al.
        21st-century hazards of smoking and benefits of cessation in the United States.
        N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 341-350https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1211128
        • Thun M.J.
        • Lopez A.D.
        • Hartge P.
        Smoking-related mortality in the United States.
        N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 1753https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1211127