Sponsorship of National Health Organizations by Two Major Soda Companies
Affiliations
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
Correspondence
- Address correspondence to: Daniel G. Aaron, BS, Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, CT-438, Boston MA 02118
Correspondence information about the author BS Daniel G. AaronAffiliations
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
Correspondence
- Address correspondence to: Daniel G. Aaron, BS, Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, CT-438, Boston MA 02118
Affiliations
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
Article Info
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Introduction
Obesity is a pervasive public health problem in the U.S. Reducing soda consumption is important for stemming the obesity epidemic. However, several articles and one book suggest that soda companies are using their resources to impede public health interventions that might reduce soda consumption. Although corporate sponsorship by tobacco and alcohol companies has been studied extensively, there has been no systematic attempt to catalog sponsorship activities of soda companies. This study investigates the nature, extent, and implications of soda company sponsorship of U.S. health and medical organizations, as well as corporate lobbying expenditures on soda- or nutrition-related public health legislation from 2011 to 2015.
Methods
Records of corporate philanthropy and lobbying expenditures on public health legislation by soda companies in the U.S. during 2011–2015 were found through Internet and database searches.
Results
From 2011 to 2015, the Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo were found to sponsor a total of 95 national health organizations, including many medical and public health institutions whose specific missions include fighting the obesity epidemic. During the study period, these two soda companies lobbied against 29 public health bills intended to reduce soda consumption or improve nutrition.
Conclusions
There is surprisingly pervasive sponsorship of national health and medical organizations by the nation’s two largest soda companies. These companies lobbied against public health intervention in 97% of cases, calling into question a sincere commitment to improving the public’s health. By accepting funding from these companies, health organizations are inadvertently participating in their marketing plans.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
Article Tools
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
