Advertisement

Comparative Effectiveness of Wellness Programs: Impact of Incentives on Healthcare Costs for Obese Enrollees

Published:November 17, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.006

      Introduction

      Employee wellness programs show mixed effectiveness results. This study examined the impact of an insurer’s lifestyle modification program on healthcare costs of obese individuals.

      Methods

      This nonrandomized comparative effectiveness study evaluated changes in healthcare costs for participants in two incentivized programs, an Internet-mediated pedometer-based walking program (WalkingSpree, n=7,594) and an in-person weight-loss program (Weight Watchers, n=5,764). The primary outcome was the change in total healthcare costs from the baseline year to the year after program participation. Data were collected from 2009 to 2011 and the analysis was done in 2014–2015.

      Results

      After 1 year, unadjusted mean costs decreased in both programs, with larger decreases for Weight Watchers participants than WalkingSpree participants (–$1,055.39 vs –$577.10, p=0.019). This difference was driven by higher rates of women in Weight Watchers, higher baseline total costs among women, and a greater decrease in costs for women in Weight Watchers (–$1,037.60 vs –$388.50, p=0.014). After adjustment for baseline costs, there were no differences by program or gender.

      Conclusions

      Comparable cost reductions in both programs suggest that employers may want to offer more than one choice of incentivized wellness program with monitoring to meet the diverse needs of employees.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Mattke S, Hangsheng L, Caloyeras J, et al. Workplace wellness programs study: final report. Santa Monica, CA; RAND Corporation. www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR254. Published 2013. Accessed May 5, 2013.

        • Caloyeras J.P.
        • Liu H.
        • Exum E.
        • Broderick M.
        • Mattke S.
        Managing manifest diseases, but not health risks, saved PepsiCo money over seven years.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2014; 33: 124-131https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0625
        • Baicker K.
        • Cutler D.
        • Song Z.R.
        Workplace wellness programs can generate savings.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29: 304-311https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0626
        • Pelletier K.R.
        A review and analysis of the clinical and cost-effectiveness studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease management programs at the worksite: update VIII 2008 to 2010.
        J Occup Environ Med. 2011; 53: 1310-1331https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182337748
        • Goetzel R.
        • Ozminkowski R.
        The health and cost benefits of work site health-promotion programs.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 2008; 29: 303-323https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090930
      2. Scanlon D, Shea D. Assessing the evidence for Penn State University’s “Take Care of Your Health” benefits program. State College, PA: Penn State University. http://sites.psu.edu/mafs/wp-content/uploads/sites/1479/2013/09/ScanlonShea_PSUWellness_Whitepaper_2013_09_09-2.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed May 5, 2013.

        • Gowrisankaran G.
        • Norberg K.
        • Kymes S.
        • et al.
        A hospital system’s wellness program linked to health plan enrollment cut hospitalizations but not overall costs.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2013; 32: 477-485https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0090
        • Horwitz J.R.
        • Kelly B.D.
        • DiNardo J.E.
        Wellness incentives in the workplace: cost savings through cost shifting to unhealthy workers.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2013; 32: 468-476https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0683
        • Burns R.J.
        • Donovan A.S.
        • Ackermann R.T.
        • et al.
        A theoretically grounded systematic review of material incentives for weight loss: implications for interventions.
        Ann Behav Med. 2012; 44: 375-388https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9403-4
        • Zulman D.M.
        • Damschroder L.J.
        • Smith R.G.
        • Richardson C.R.
        Implementation and evaluation of an incentivized Internet-mediated walking program for obese adults.
        Transl Behav Med. 2013; 3: 357-369https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-013-0211-6
      3. Concannon TW, Khodyakov D, Kotzias V, et al. Employer, insurer, and industry perspectives on patient-centered comparative effectiveness research: final report. Santa Monica, CA; RAND Corporation. www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1242.html. Published 2015. Accessed May 5, 2015.

        • Bell J.F.
        • Zimmerman F.J.
        • Arterburn D.E.
        • Maciejewski M.L.
        Health-care expenditures of overweight and obese males and females in the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey by Age Cohort.
        Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011; 19: 228-232https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2010.104
        • Koenker R.
        Quantile Regression.
        Cambridge University Press, New York, NY2005https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754098
        • Charlson M.E.
        • Pompei P.
        • Ales K.L.
        • MacKenzie C.R.
        A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.
        J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40: 373-383https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
        • Owens G.M.
        Gender differences in health care expenditures, resource utilization, and quality of care.
        J Manag Care Pharm. 2008; 14: 2-6https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.S3-A.2
        • McNamara A.M.
        • Wohletz M.C.
        Women’s health: issues and opportunities for managed care pharmacy.
        J Manag Care Pharm. 2001; 7: 263-267https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2001.7.4.263
      4. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. National health expenditure fact sheet. www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/NHE-Fact-Sheet.html. Published 2014. Accessed May 5, 2014.

        • Alemayehu B.
        • Warner K.E.
        The lifetime distribution of health care costs.
        Health Serv Res. 2004; 39: 627-642https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00248.x
        • Segar M.L.
        • Updegraff J.A.
        • Zikmund-Fisher B.J.
        • Richardson C.R.
        Physical activity advertisements that feature daily well-being improve autonomy and body image in overweight women but not men.
        J Obes. 2012; 2012: 354721https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/354721
        • Bagozzi R.P.
        • Edwards E.A.
        Goal setting and goal pursuit in the regulation of body weight.
        Psychol Health. 1998; 13: 593-621https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449808407421
        • Neumark-Sztainer D.
        • Sherwood N.E.
        • French S.A.
        • Jeffery R.W.
        Weight control behaviors among adult men and women: cause for concern?.
        Obes Res. 1999; 7: 179-188https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1550-8528.1999.tb00700.x
        • Kruger J.
        • Galuska D.A.
        • Serdula M.K.
        • Jones D.A.
        Attempting to lose weight: specific practices among U.S. adults.
        Am J Prev Med. 2004; 26 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.03.016): 402-406
        • Weiss E.C.
        • Galuska D.A.
        • Khan L.K.
        • Serdula M.K.
        Weight-control practices among U.S. adults, 2001-2002.
        Am J Prev Med. 2006; 31: 18-24https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.03.016
        • Markey C.N.
        • Markey P.M.
        Relations between body image and dieting behaviors: an examination of gender differences.
        Sex Roles. 2005; 53: 519-530https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-7139-3
      5. How gender and work site affect employee engagement: a joint national business group Optum study. Eden Prairie, MN; Optum. www.optum.com/content/dam/optum/resources/whitePapers/100819_OptumHealth_Gender-Worksite_Engagement_Final.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed May 4, 2014.

        • Giles E.L.
        • Robalino S.
        • McColl E.
        • Sniehotta F.F.
        • Adams J.
        The effectiveness of financial incentives for health behaviour change: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9: e90347https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090347
        • Strohacker K.
        • Galarraga O.
        • Williams D.M.
        The impact of incentives on exercise behavior: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
        Ann Behav Med. 2013; 48: 92-99https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9577-4
        • Patel M.S.
        • Asch D.A.
        • Rosin R.
        • et al.
        Framing financial incentives to increase physical activity among overweight and obese adults: a randomized, controlled trial.
        Ann Intern Med. 2016; 164: 385-394https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-1635
        • Patel M.S.
        • Asch D.A.
        • Troxel A.B.
        • et al.
        Premium-based financial incentives did not promote workplace weight loss in a 2013-15 study.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2016; 35: 71-79https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0945