Advertisement

Community Audit of Social, Civil, and Activity Domains in Diverse Environments (CASCADDE)

Published:February 10, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.013
      There are currently no direct observation environmental audit tools that measure diverse aspects of the obesity-related environment efficiently and reliably in a variety of geographic settings. The goal was to develop a new instrument to reliably characterize the overall properties and features of rural, suburban, and urban settings along multiple dimensions. The Community Audit of Social, Civil, and Activity Domains in Diverse Environments (CASCADDE) is an iPad-based instrument that incorporates GPS coordinates and photography and comprises 214 items yielding seven summary indices. A comprehensive spatial sampling strategy, training manual, and supporting data analysis code were also developed. Random geospatial sampling using GIS was used to capture features of the community as a whole. A single auditor collected 510 observation points in 30 communities (2013–2015). This analysis was done in 2015–2016. Correlation coefficients were used to compare items and indices to each other and to standard measures. Multilevel unconditional means models were used to calculate intraclass correlation coefficients to determine if there was significant variation between communities. Results suggest that CASCADDE measures aspects of communities not previously captured by secondary data sources. Additionally, seven summary indices capture meaningful differences between communities based on 15 observations per community. Community audit tools such as CASCADDE complement secondary data sources and have the potential to offer new insights about the mechanisms through which communities affect obesity and other health outcomes.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Swinburn B.
        • Egger G.
        • Raza F.
        Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity.
        Prev Med. 1999; 29: 563-570https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1999.0585
        • Hill J.O.
        • Peters J.C.
        Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic.
        Science. 1998; 280: 1371-1374https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5368.1371
        • Adams M.A.
        • Sallis J.F.
        • Kerr J.
        • et al.
        Neighborhood environment profiles related to physical activity and weight status: a latent profile analysis.
        Prev Med. 2011; 52: 326-331https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.02.020
        • Boone-Heinonen J.
        • Gordon-Larsen P.
        Obesogenic environments in youth: concepts and methods from a longitudinal national sample.
        Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42: e37-e46https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.005
        • Elinder L.S.
        • Jansson M.
        Obesogenic environments—aspects on measurement and indicators.
        Public Health Nutr. 2009; 12: 307-315https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980008002450
        • Meyer K.A.
        • Boone-Heinonen J.
        • Duffey K.J.
        • et al.
        Combined measure of neighborhood food and physical activity environments and weight-related outcomes: the CARDIA study.
        Health Place. 2015; 33: 9-18https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.01.004
      1. Nau C, Ellis H, Hong H, et al. Exploring the forest instead of the trees: an innovative method for defining obesogenic environments. In: Population Association of America. Boston, MA; 2014.

        • Wall M.M.
        • Larson N.I.
        • Forsyth A.
        • et al.
        Patterns of obesogenic neighborhood features and adolescent weight: a comparison of statistical approaches.
        Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42: e65-e75https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.009
        • Schaefer-McDaniel N.
        • Caughy M.O.
        • O’Campo P.
        • Gearey W.
        Examining methodological details of neighbourhood observations and the relationship to health: a literature review.
        Soc Sci Med. 2010; 70: 277-292https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.018
        • Boone-Heinonen J.
        • Diez-Roux A.V.
        • Goff D.C.
        • et al.
        The neighborhood energy balance equation: does neighborhood food retail environment + physical activity environment = obesity? The CARDIA study.
        PLoS One. 2013; 8: e85141https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085141
        • Giskes K.
        • van Lenthe F.
        • Avendano-Pabon M.
        • Brug J.
        A systematic review of environmental factors and obesogenic dietary intakes among adults: are we getting closer to understanding obesogenic environments?.
        Obes Rev. 2011; 12: e95-e106https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00769.x
        • Morland K.
        • Wing S.
        • Diez Roux A.
        The contextual effect of the local food environment on residents’ diets: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study.
        Am J Public Health. 2002; 92: 1761-1767https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.92.11.1761
        • Barrington W.E.
        • Beresford S.A.
        • Koepsell T.D.
        • Duncan G.E.
        • Moudon A.V.
        Worksite neighborhood and obesogenic behaviors: findings among employees in the Promoting Activity and Changes in Eating (PACE) trial.
        Am J Prev Med. 2015; 48: 31-41https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.025
        • Frank L.D.
        • Saelens B.E.
        • Chapman J.
        • et al.
        Objective assessment of obesogenic environments in youth: geographic information system methods and spatial findings from the Neighborhood Impact on Kids study.
        Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42: e47-e55https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.006
        • Auchincloss A.H.
        • Mujahid M.S.
        • Shen M.
        • Michos E.D.
        • Whitt-Glover M.C.
        • Diez Roux A.V.
        Neighborhood health-promoting resources and obesity risk (the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis).
        Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013; 21: 621-628https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20255
        • Burdette A.M.
        • Needham B.L.
        Neighborhood environment and body mass index trajectories from adolescence to adulthood.
        J Adolesc Health. 2012; 50: 30-37https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.03.009
        • Han E.
        • Powell L.M.
        • Zenk S.N.
        • Rimkus L.
        • Ohri-Vachaspati P.
        • Chaloupka F.J.
        Classification bias in commercial business lists for retail food stores in the U.S.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9: 46https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-46
        • Liese A.D.
        • Colabianchi N.
        • Lamichhane A.P.
        • et al.
        Validation of 3 food outlet databases: completeness and geospatial accuracy in rural and urban food environments.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2010; 172: 1324-1333https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq292
        • Laraia B.A.
        • Messer L.
        • Kaufman J.S.
        • et al.
        Direct observation of neighborhood attributes in an urban area of the U.S. south: characterizing the social context of pregnancy.
        Int J Health Geogr. 2006; 5: 11https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-5-11
        • Macintyre S.
        • Ellaway A.
        • Cummins S.
        Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them?.
        Soc Sci Med. 2002; 55: 125-139https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00214-3
        • Lash T.L.
        • Fink A.K.
        Re: Neighborhood environment and loss of physical function in older adults: evidence from the Alameda County Study.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 157: 472-473https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwf191
        • Caughy M.O.
        • O’Campo P.J.
        • Patterson J.
        A brief observational measure for urban neighborhoods.
        Health Place. 2001; 7: 225-236https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-8292(01)00012-0
      2. Entwisle B, Edelblute HB, Frizzelle B, McDaniel P. Innovation in the measurement of place: systematic social observation in a rural setting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America; April 15–17, 2010; Dallas, TX.

        • Raudenbush S.W.
        • Sampson R.J.
        Ecometrics: toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with application to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods.
        Sociol Methodol. 1999; 29: 1-41https://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00059
        • Sampson R.J.
        • Raudenbush S.W.
        Systematic social observation of public spaces: a new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods.
        Am J Sociol. 1999; 105: 603-651https://doi.org/10.1086/210356
        • Jones M.
        • Pebley A.R.
        • Sastry N.
        Eyes on the block: measuring urban physical disorder through in-person observation.
        Soc Sci Res. 2011; 40: 523-537https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.11.007
        • Day K.
        • Boarnet M.
        • Alfonzo M.
        • Forsyth A.
        The Irvine-Minnesota inventory to measure built environments: development.
        Am J Prev Med. 2006; 30: 144-152https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.017
        • Furr-Holden C.D.
        • Campbell K.D.
        • Milam A.J.
        • Smart M.J.
        • Ialongo N.A.
        • Leaf P.J.
        Metric properties of the Neighborhood Inventory for Environmental Typology (NIfETy): an environmental assessment tool for measuring indicators of violence, alcohol, tobacco, and other drug exposures.
        Eval Rev. 2010; 34: 159-184https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X10368493
        • Pikora T.J.
        • Bull F.C.
        • Jamrozik K.
        • Knuiman M.
        • Giles-Corti B.
        • Donovan R.J.
        Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity.
        Am J Prev Med. 2002; 23: 187-194https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00498-1
        • Brownson R.C.
        • Hoehner C.M.
        • Brennan L.K.
        • Cook R.A.
        • Elliott M.B.
        • McMullen K.M.
        Reliability of 2 instruments for auditing the environment for physical activity.
        J Phys Act Health. 2004; 1: 191-208https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.1.3.191
        • Evenson K.R.
        • Sotres-Alvarez D.
        • Herring A.H.
        • Messer L.
        • Laraia B.A.
        • Rodriguez D.A.
        Assessing urban and rural neighborhood characteristics using audit and GIS data: derivation and reliability of constructs.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009; 6: 44https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-6-44
        • Yousefian A.
        • Hennessy E.
        • Umstattd M.R.
        • et al.
        Development of the Rural Active Living Assessment Tools: measuring rural environments.
        Prev Med. 2010; 50: S86-S92https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.08.018
        • Schwartz B.S.
        • Stewart W.F.
        • Godby S.
        • et al.
        Body mass index and the built and social environments in children and adolescents using electronic health records.
        Am J Prev Med. 2011; 41: e17-e28https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.038
        • Raudenbush S.W.
        The quantitative assessment of neighborhood social environments.
        in: Kawachi I. Berkman L.F. Neighborhoods and Health. Oxford University Press, New York2003: 112-131https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195138382.003.0005
        • Nau C.
        • Schwartz B.S.
        • Bandeen-Roche K.
        • et al.
        Community socioeconomic deprivation and obesity trajectories in children using electronic health records.
        Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015; 23: 207-212https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20903
        • Ross C.E.
        • Mirowsky J.
        Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and health.
        J Health Soc Behav. 2001; 42: 258-276https://doi.org/10.2307/3090214
        • Ross C.E.
        • Mirowsky J.
        Disorder and decay: the concept and measurement of perceived neighborhood disorder.
        Urban Aff Rev Thousand Oaks Calif. 1999; 34: 412-432https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922184004
        • Browning C.R.
        • Cagney K.A.
        Moving beyond poverty: neighborhood structure, social processes, and health.
        J Health Soc Behav. 2003; 44: 552-571https://doi.org/10.2307/1519799
        • Cagney K.A.
        • Glass T.A.
        • Skarupski K.A.
        • Barnes L.L.
        • Schwartz B.S.
        • Mendes de Leon C.F.
        Neighborhood-level cohesion and disorder: measurement and validation in two older adult urban populations.
        J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009; 64: 415-424https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbn041
        • Sampson R.J.
        How does community context matter? Social mechanisms and the explanation of crime rates.
        in: Wilstrom P.-O.H. Sampson R.J. The Explanation of Crime: Context, Mechanisms and Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK2006: 31-60
        • Augustin T.
        • Glass T.A.
        • James B.D.
        • Schwartz B.S.
        Neighborhood psychosocial hazards and cardiovascular disease: the Baltimore Memory Study.
        Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 1664-1670https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.125138
        • Schwartz J.
        • Bellinger D.
        • Glass T.
        Exploring potential sources of differential vulnerability and susceptibility in risk from environmental hazards to expand the scope of risk assessment.
        Am J Public Health. 2011; 101: S94-S101https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300272
        • Mujahid M.S.
        • Diez Roux A.V.
        • Morenoff J.D.
        • Raghunathan T.
        Assessing the measurement properties of neighborhood scales: from psychometrics to ecometrics.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2007; 165: 858-867https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm040