Advertisement

Children’s Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity Attending Summer Day Camps

Published:February 14, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.019

      Introduction

      National physical activity standards call for all children to accumulate 60 minutes/day of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). The contribution of summer day camps toward meeting this benchmark is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to provide estimates of children’s MVPA during summer day camps.

      Methods

      Children (n=1,061, 78% enrollment; mean age, 7.8 years; 46% female; 65% African American; 48% normal weight) from 20 summer day camps wore ActiGraph GT3x+ accelerometers on the wrist during camp hours for up to 4 non-consecutive days over the summer of 2015 (July). Accumulated MVPA at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile of the distribution was estimated using random-effects quantile regression. All models were estimated separately for boys and girls and controlled for wear time. Minutes of MVPA were dichotomized to ≥60 minutes/day of MVPA or <60 minutes/day to estimate percentage of boys and girls meeting the 60 minutes/day guideline. All data were analyzed in spring 2016.

      Results

      Across the 20 summer day camps, boys (n=569) and girls (n=492) accumulated a median of 96 and 82 minutes/day of MVPA, respectively. The percentage of children meeting 60 minutes/day of MVPA was 80% (range, 41%−94%) for boys and 73% (range, 30%–97%) for girls.

      Conclusions

      Summer day camps are a setting where a large portion of boys and girls meet daily physical activity guidelines. Public health practitioners should focus efforts on making summer day camps accessible for children in the U.S.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. American Camping Association. 2015 Fall Enrollment Summary Results. www.acacamps.org/. Accessed March 21, 2016.

      2. U.S. DHHS. 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. https://health.gov/paguidelines/. Accessed March 23, 2016.

        • Beets M.W.
        • Weaver R.G.
        • Beighle A.
        • Webster C.
        • Pate R.R.
        How physically active are children attending summer day camps?.
        J Phys Act Health. 2013; 10: 850-885https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.10.6.850
        • Troiano R.P.
        • Berrigan D.
        • Dodd K.W.
        • et al.
        Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40: 181-188https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3
        • Beets M.W.
        • Morgan C.F.
        • Banda J.A.
        • et al.
        Convergent validity of pedometer and accelerometer estimates of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity of youth.
        J Phys Act Health. 2011; 8: S295-S305https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.8.s2.s295
        • Baranowski T.
        • Baranowski J.C.
        • Cullen K.W.
        • et al.
        The fun, food, and fitness project (FFFP): the Baylor GEMS pilot study.
        Ethn Dis. 2003; 13: S1-S30
        • Bailey R.C.
        • Olson J.
        • Pepper S.L.
        • et al.
        The level and tempo of children’s physical activities: an observational study.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995; 27: 1033-1041https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199507000-00012
        • Banda J.A.
        • Haydel K.F.
        • Davila T.
        • et al.
        Effects of varying epoch lengths, wear time algorithms, and activity cut-points on estimates of child sedentary behavior and physical activity from accelerometer data.
        PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0150534https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150534
        • Chandler J.
        • Brazendale K.
        • Beets M.
        • Mealing B.
        Classification of physical activity intensities using a wrist‐worn accelerometer in 8–12–year‐old children.
        Pediatr Obes. 2015; 11: 120-127https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12033
        • Geraci M.
        • Bottai M.
        Linear quantile mixed models.
        Stat Comput. 2014; 24: 461-479https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-013-9381-9
        • Routen A.C.
        • Upton D.
        • Edwards M.G.
        • Peters D.M.
        Discrepancies in accelerometer-measured physical activity in children due to cut-point non-equivalence and placement site.
        J Sports Sci. 2012; 30: 1303-1310https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.709266
        • Brazendale K.
        • Beets M.W.
        • Weaver R.G.
        • et al.
        Wasting our time? Allocated versus accumulated physical activity in afterschool programs.
        J Phys Act Health. 2015; 12: 1061-1065https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2014-0163
        • Beets M.W.
        • Weaver R.G.
        • Turner-McGrievy G.
        • et al.
        Are we there yet? Compliance with physical activity standards in YMCA afterschool programs.
        Child Obes. 2016; 12: 237-246https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2015.0223
        • Long M.W.
        • Sobol A.M.
        • Cradock A.L.
        • et al.
        School-day and overall physical activity among youth.
        Am J Prev Med. 2013; 45: 150-157https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.011
        • Trost S.G.
        • Rosenkranz R.R.
        • Dzewaltowski D.
        Physical activity levels among children attending after-school programs.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40: 622https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318161eaa5