Advertisement

Associations Between County Wealth, Health and Social Services Spending, and Health Outcomes

      Introduction

      Each year, the County Health Rankings rate the health outcomes of each county in the U.S. A common refrain is that poor counties perform worse than wealthier ones. This article examines that assumption and specifically analyzes characteristics of counties that have performed better in terms of health outcomes than their wealth alone would suggest.

      Methods

      Data from the 2013 County Health Rankings were used, as were 2012 financial and demographic information collected by the U.S. Census Bureau. A logistic model was constructed to examine the odds of a county “overperforming” in the rankings relative to community wealth. Analyses were performed in 2016.

      Results

      Communities that were wealthier performed better on the rankings. However, more than 800 of 3,141 counties overperformed by ranking in a better health outcomes quartile than their county’s wealth alone would suggest. Regression analyses found that for each additional percentage point of total public spending that was allocated toward community health care and public health, the odds of being an overperformer increased by 3.7%.

      Conclusions

      Community wealth correlates with health, but not always. Population health outcomes in hundreds of counties overperform what would be expected given community wealth alone. These counties tend to invest more in community health care and public health spending and other social services. Although the level of a community’s wealth is outside the control of practitioners, shifting the proportion of spending to certain social services may positively impact population health.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Adler N.E.
        • Newman K.
        Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2002; 21: 60-76https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.60
        • Adler N.E.
        • Ostrove J.M.
        Socioeconomic status and health: what we know and what we don׳t.
        Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999; 896: 3-15https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08101.x
        • Marmot M.
        Social determinants of health inequalities.
        Lancet. 2005; 365: 1099-1104https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)74234-3
        • Harris A.L.
        • Scutchfield F.D.
        • Heise G.
        • Ingram R.C.
        The relationship between local public health agency administrative variables and county health status rankings in Kentucky.
        J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014; 20: 378-383https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182a5c2f8
        • Metzler M.
        Social determinants of health: what, how, why, and now.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2007; 4: A85
        • Metzler M.
        • Kanarek N.
        • Highsmith K.
        • et al.
        Community health status indicators project: the development of a national approach to community health.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2008; 5: A94
        • Kindig D.A.
        • Booske B.C.
        • Remington P.L.
        Mobilizing Action Toward Community Health (MATCH): metrics, incentives, and partnerships for population health.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2010; 7: A68
        • Arndt S.
        • Acion L.
        • Caspers K.
        • Blood P.
        How reliable are county and regional health rankings?.
        Prev Sci. 2013; 14: 497-502https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0320-3
        • Peppard P.E.
        • Kindig D.A.
        • Dranger E.
        • Jovaag A.
        • Remington P.L.
        Ranking community health status to stimulate discussion of local public health issues: the Wisconsin County Health Rankings.
        Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 209-212https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.092981
        • Kanarek N.
        • Tsai H.-L.
        • Stanley J.
        Health ranking of the largest U.S. counties using the Community Health Status Indicators peer strata and database.
        J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011; 17: 401-405https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0b013e318205413c
      1. LexisNexis Academic. Database search for county health rankings (2010–2015). www.lexisnexis.com/. Published 2016. Accessed July 20, 2016.

        • Rohan A.M.
        • Booske B.C.
        • Remington P.L.
        Using the Wisconsin county health rankings to catalyze community health improvement.
        J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009; 15: 24-32https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181903bf8
      2. Myers S. County health ranking falls to lowest level in five years. Davidson County Dispatch. www.the-dispatch.com/news/20150327/county-health-ranking-falls-to-lowest-level-in-five-years. Published March 27, 2015. Accessed February 23, 2017.

      3. Cook J. Cumberland ranked least healthy county in New Jersey according to study. NJ True Jersey. www.nj.com/cumberland/index.ssf/2012/04/cumberland_ranked_least_health.html. Published April 3, 2012. Accessed February 23, 2017.

      4. Hiers F. Marion still lags in county health rankings. Ocala Star Banner. www.ocala.com/news/20130326/marion-still-lags-in-county-health-rankings. Published March 26, 2013. Accessed February 23, 2017.

      5. Lundy J. Report shows link between health and wealth, St. Louis County officials say. Duluth News Tribune. www.duluthnewstribune.com/content/report-shows-link-between-health-and-wealth-st-louis-county-officials-say. Published April 4, 2012. Accessed February 23, 2017.

      6. Wealthiest Georgia counties enjoy best health but all pay for poor care, data show. The Augusta Chronicle. http://chronicle.augusta.com/news-metro-health/2012-04-25/wealthiest-georgia-counties-enjoy-best-health-all-pay-poor-care-data. Published April 25, 2012. Accessed April 30, 2017.

      7. Stutzman E. The wealth and health of Colorado. Boulder Daily Camera. www.dailycamera.com/ci_22825766/wealth-and-health-colorado. Published March 20, 2013. Accessed February 23, 2017.

        • Kennedy B.P.
        • Kawachi I.
        • Glass R.
        • Prothrow-Stith D.
        Income distribution, socioeconomic status, and self rated health in the United States: multilevel analysis.
        BMJ. 1998; 317: 917-921https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7163.917
        • Kawachi I.
        • Kennedy B.P.
        • Lochner K.
        • Prothrow-Stith D.
        Social capital, income inequality, and mortality.
        Am J Public Health. 1997; 87: 1491-1498https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.87.9.1491
        • Brown T.T.
        Returns on investment in California county departments of public health.
        Am J Public Health. 2016; 106: 1477-1482https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303233
        • Mays G.P.
        • Smith S.A.
        Evidence links increases in public health spending to declines in preventable deaths.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2011; 30: 1585-1593https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0196
        • Singh S.R.
        Public health spending and population health: a systematic review.
        Am J Prev Med. 2014; 47: 634-640https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.05.017
        • McCullough J.M.
        • Leider J.P.
        Government spending in health and nonhealth sectors associated with improvement in county health rankings.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2016; 35: 2037-2043https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0708
        • McCullough J.M.
        • Leider J.P.
        • Riley W.J.
        Local fiscal allocation for public health departments.
        Am J Prev Med. 2015; 49: 921-929https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.021
        • Leider J.P.
        The problem with estimating public health spending.
        J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016; 22: E1-E11https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182941a7b
        • Honoré P.A.
        • Fos P.J.
        • Wang X.
        • Moonesinghe R.
        The effects on population health status of using dedicated property taxes to fund local public health agencies.
        BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: 471https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-471
        • Willard R.
        • Shah G.H.
        • Leep C.
        • Ku L.
        Impact of the 2008-2010 economic recession on local health departments.
        J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012; 18: 106-114https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182461cf2
        • Mays G.P.
        • Hogg R.A.
        Economic shocks and public health protections in U.S. metropolitan areas.
        Am J Public Health. 2015; 105: S280-S287https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302456
      8. Population Health Institute. County health rankings. 2016. www.countyhealthrankings.org/. Accessed January 22, 2016.

        • U.S. Census Bureau
        Government Finance and Employment Classification Manual.
        U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC2006
        • U.S. Census Bureau
        USA Counties Data File Downloads.
        U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC2014
        • Bekemeier B.
        • Grembowski D.
        • Yang Y.R.
        • Herting J.R.
        Local public health delivery of maternal child health services: are specific activities associated with reductions in black-white mortality disparities?.
        Matern Child Health J. 2012; 16: 615-623https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0794-9
        • Brown T.T.
        • Martinez-Gutierrez M.S.
        • Navab B.
        The impact of changes in county public health expenditures on general health in the population.
        Health Econ Policy Law. 2014; 9: 251-269https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744133114000024
        • Deaton A.
        Policy implications of the gradient of health and wealth..
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2002; 21 (https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.13): 13-30