Introduction
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive MedicineReferences
- Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice.J Gen Intern Med. 2012; 27: 1361-1367https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6
- Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare.BMJ. 2012; 344: e256https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e256
- Publication trends of shared decision making in 15 high impact medical journals: a full-text review with bibliometric analysis.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014; 14: 71https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-71
- Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.Patient Educ Couns. 2012; 86: 9-18https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.004
- Communicating with patients on health care evidence. Discussion paper.National Academy of Medicine, Washington, DC2012
- Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 9: CD006732https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub3
- Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics.JAMA. 1999; 282: 2313-2320https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.24.2313
- Shared decision-making: the case for letting patients decide which choice is best.J Fam Pract. 1997; 45: 205-208
- Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening?.Cancer. 2004; 101: 1214-1228https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20512
- Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. A suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Am J Prev Med. 2004; 26: 56-66https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.011
- An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters.Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 60: 301-312https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010
- Lack of shared decision making in cancer screening discussions: results from a national survey.Am J Prev Med. 2014; 47: 251-259https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.04.011
- Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers.Med Care Res Rev. 2007; 64: 169-190https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587070640020301
- Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review.Ann Oncol. 2010; 21: 1145-1151https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp534
- Questioning the quantitative imperative: decision aids, prevention, and the ethics of disclosure.Hastings Cent Rep. 2011; 41: 30-39https://doi.org/10.1353/hcr.2011.0029
- Whole mind and shared mind in clinical decision-making.Patient Educ Couns. 2013; 90: 200-206https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.035
- Breast cancer recommendation statement from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2016; 164: 448https://doi.org/10.7326/L16-0404
American Urological Association. Early detection of prostate cancer. www.auanet.org/guidelines/early-detection-of-prostate-cancer-(2013-reviewed-and-validity-confirmed-2015). Accessed October 17, 2017.
- Testing for Prostate Cancer: “Should I Be Tested? Is it the Right Choice for Me?”.American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA2010
- Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157: 120-134https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459
- Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.Gastroenterology. 2008; 134: 1570-1595https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.002
Final Recommendation Statement: Colorectal Cancer: Screening. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/colorectal-cancer-screening. October 2014. Accessed December 6, 2017.
- Rethinking the information priorities of patients.JAMA. 2014; 311: 1857-1858https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.3038
- Direct observation of community-based ambulatory encounters involving medical students.JAMA. 1997; 278: 712-716https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550090036029
- A vision for patient-centered health information systems.JAMA. 2011; 305: 300-301https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.2011
- Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens.BMJ. 2015; 350: g7624https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7624
- Harnessing information technology to inform patients facing routine decisions.Ann Fam Med. 2017; 15: 217-224https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2063
- Engaging primary care patients to use a patient-centered personal health record.Ann Fam Med. 2014; 12: 418-426https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1691
- Designing a patient-centered personal health record to promote preventive care.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011; 11: 73https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-11-73
- Interactive preventive health record to enhance delivery of recommended care: a randomized trial.Ann Fam Med. 2012; 10: 312-319https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1383
- Authentic engagement of patients and communities can transform research, practice, and policy.Health Aff (Millwood). 2016; 35: 590-594https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1512
O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Jacobsen M. Ottawa Personal Decision Guide. http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/decguide.html. Accessed August 5, 2011.
- Are you SURE? Assessing patient decisional conflict with a 4-item screening test.Can Fam Physician. 2010; 56: e308-e314
- The Control Preferences Scale.Can J Nurs Res. 1997; 29: 21-43
- Validation of a decisional conflict scale.Med Decis Mak. 1995; 15: 25-30https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9501500105
- Ottawa Decision Support Framework to Address Decisional Conflict.Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON2006
- Understanding health information, communication, and information seeking of patients and consumers: a comprehensive and integrated model.Health Expect. 2005; 8: 189-194https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00339.x
International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. IPDAS 2005: Criteria for judging the quality of patient decision aids. www.ipdas.ohri.ca/IPDAS_checklist.pdf. Accessed October 17, 2017.
- Methods for evaluating respondent attrition in web-based surveys.J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18: e301https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6342
- Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States.JAMA. 2004; 291: 71-78https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.1.71
- Older adults and forgoing cancer screening: “I think it would be strange.”.JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173: 526-531https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2903
- Do not delay: breast cancer and time, 1900–1970.Milbank Q. 2001; 79: 355-386https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.00212
- Cancer screening rates in individuals with different life expectancies.JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174: 1558-1565https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3895
- The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening.Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38: 499-507https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.020
- Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis.Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38: 508-516https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.021
- What would make getting colorectal cancer screening easier? Perspectives from screeners and nonscreeners.Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012; 2012: 895807https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/895807
- Disparities in patient reports of communications to inform decision making in the DECISIONS survey.Patient Educ Couns. 2012; 87: 198-205https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.08.002
- Heterogeneity of cancer patient information-seeking behaviors.Med Decis Making. 2012; 32: 362-375https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X11415114
- Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology.Guilford Press, New York, NY1999
- How people make decisions that involve risk: a dual-processes approach.Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2004; 13: 60-66https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00275.x
- The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Psychol Bull. 1996; 119: 3-22https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3
- Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious.Am Psychol. 1994; 49: 709-724https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709
- Affect, risk, and decision making.Health Psychol. 2005; 24: S35-S40https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S35
- Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences.Am Psychol. 1980; 35: 151-175https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
- The Self-Regulation of Health and Illness Behaviour.Routledge, New York2003
- Risk as feelings.Psychol Bull. 2001; 127: 267-286https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
- The persistent use of negative affect by anxious individuals to estimate risk.J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998; 74: 1350-1363https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1350
- The springs of action: Affective and analytical information processing in choice.Person Soc Psychol Bull. 2000; 26: 1465-1475https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002612002
- The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits.J Behav Decis Making. 2000; 13: 1-17https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S
- The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less.Harper Collins, London2004
- Beyond information: exploring patients’ preferences.JAMA. 2009; 302: 195-197https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.984
- Chapter 18: Cognitive processes in stated preference methods.in: Mäler K. Vincent J.R. Handbook of Environmental Economics. Vol 2 - Valuing Environmental Changes. Elsevier, Amsterdam2005: 937-968
- Understanding patient perceptions of shared decision making.Patient Educ Couns. 2014; 96: 295-301https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.017
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions.Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 73: 526-535https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.018
- Practicing shared decision making in the outpatient psychiatric care of adults with severe mental illnesses: redesigning care for the future.Community Ment Health J. 2010; 46: 433-440https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-009-9265-9
- Inconsistencies in patient perceptions and observer ratings of shared decision making: the case of colorectal cancer screening.Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 80: 358-363https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.034
- The liability of giving patients a choice: shared decision making and prostate cancer.Am Fam Physician. 2005; 71: 1871-1872
- What are the external influences on information exchange and shared decision-making in healthcare consultations: a meta-synthesis of the literature.Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 75: 37-52https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.025
- Patient-centred communication: a sophisticated procedure.BMJ Qual Saf. 2011; 20: 823-825https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000323
- Patients’ knowledge about 9 common health conditions: the DECISIONS survey.Med Decis Making. 2010; 30: 35S-52Shttps://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X10378700
- Aiding medical decision making: a communication perspective.Med Decis Making. 2007; 27: 550-553https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X07307581
- Informed decision-making and colorectal cancer screening: is it occurring in primary care?.Med Care. 2008; 46: S23-S29https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817dc496
- Perceptions of informed decision making about cancer screening in a diverse primary care population.Fam Med. 2010; 42: 421-427
- Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussions and screening use.Am J Prev Med. 2006; 31: 202-209https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.04.010
- Prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the National Survey of Medical Decisions (DECISIONS study).Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169: 1611-1618https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.262
- Patient-rated importance and receipt of information for colorectal cancer screening.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011; 20: 2168-2173https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0281
- Unwanted control: how patients in the primary care setting decide about screening for prostate cancer.Patient Educ Couns. 2005; 56: 116-124https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2003.12.002
- Are physicians discussing prostate cancer screening with their patients and why or why not? A pilot study.J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22: 901-907https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0142-3
- Informed decision making before initiating screening mammography: Does it occur and does it make a difference?.Health Expect. 2008; 11: 366-375https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00514.x
- Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussions: delivery of the 5A’s in practice.Am J Prev Med. 2011; 41: 480-486https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.07.018
- Patient understanding of benefits, risks, and alternatives to screening colonoscopy.Fam Med. 2013; 45: 83-89
- Deficits and variations in patients’ experience with making 9 common medical decisions: the DECISIONS survey.Med Decis Making. 2010; 30: 85S-95Shttps://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X10380466
- Authoritarian physicians and patients’ fear of being labeled ‘difficult’ among key obstacles to shared decision making.Health Aff (Millwood). 2012; 31: 1030-1038https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0576
- Power imbalance prevents shared decision making.BMJ. 2014; 348: g3178https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3178
- Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; 10: CD001431https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3
- A randomized controlled effectiveness trial for PSA screening decision support interventions in two primary care settings.J Gen Intern Med. 2015; 30: 810-816https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3214-9
- What is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening?.CA Cancer J Clin. 2013; 63: 193-214https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21180
- Clinicians’ perceptions of digital vs. paper-based decision support interventions.J Eval Clin Pract. 2015; 21: 175-179https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12269
- The importance of communication in collaborative decision making: facilitating shared mind and the management of uncertainty.J Eval Clin Pract. 2011; 17: 579-584https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01549.x
- Shared mind: communication, decision making, and autonomy in serious illness.Ann Fam Med. 2011; 9: 454-461https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1301
- Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice.Ann Intern Med. 1996; 125: 763-769https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-125-9-199611010-00010
- The effect of patient portals on quality outcomes and its implications to meaningful use: a systematic review.Med Internet Res. 2015; 17: e44https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3171
- Accuracy of self-reported reason for colorectal cancer testing.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010; 19: 196-200https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0335
- The DECISIONS study: a nationwide survey of United States adults regarding 9 common medical decisions.Med Decis Making. 2010; 30: 20S-34Shttps://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X09353792