Advertisement

Effectiveness of User- and Expert-Driven Web-based Hypertension Programs: an RCT

Published:February 15, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.009

      Introduction

      The effectiveness of self-guided Internet-based lifestyle counseling (e-counseling) varies, depending on treatment protocol. Two dominant procedures in e-counseling are expert- and user-driven. The influence of these procedures on hypertension management remains unclear. The objective was to assess whether blood pressure improved with expert-driven or user-driven e-counseling over control intervention in patients with hypertension over a 4-month period.

      Study design

      This study used a three-parallel group, double-blind randomized controlled design.

      Setting/participants

      In Toronto, Canada, 128 participants (aged 35–74 years) with hypertension were recruited. Participants were recruited using online and poster advertisements. Data collection took place between June 2012 and June 2014. Data were analyzed from October 2014 to December 2016.

      Intervention

      Controls received a weekly e-mail newsletter regarding hypertension management. The expert-driven group was prescribed a weekly exercise and diet plan (e.g., increase 1,000 steps/day this week). The user-driven group received weekly e-mail, which allowed participants to choose their intervention goals (e.g., [1] feel more confident to change my lifestyle, or [2] self-help tips for exercise or a heart healthy diet).

      Main outcome measures

      Primary outcome was systolic blood pressure measured at baseline and 4-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included cholesterol, 10-year Framingham cardiovascular risk, daily steps, and dietary habits.

      Results

      Expert-driven groups showed a greater systolic blood pressure decrease than controls at follow-up (expert-driven versus control: −7.5 mmHg, 95% CI= −12.5, −2.6, p=0.01). Systolic blood pressure reduction did not significantly differ between user- and expert-driven. Expert-driven compared with controls also showed a significant improvement in pulse pressure, cholesterol, and Framingham risk score. The expert-driven intervention was significantly more effective than both user-driven and control groups in increasing daily steps and fruit intake.

      Conclusions

      It may be advisable to incorporate an expert-driven e-counseling protocol in order to accommodate participants with greater motivation to change their lifestyle behaviors, but more studies are needed.

      Trial registration

      This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03111836.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Dasgupta K.
        • Quinn R.R.
        • Zarnke K.B.
        • et al.
        The 2014 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension.
        Can J Cardiol. 2014; 30: 485-501https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2014.02.002
        • King A.C.
        • Bickmore T.W.
        • Campero M.I.
        • Pruitt L.A.
        • Yin J.L.
        Employing virtual advisors in preventive care for underserved communities: results from the COMPASS study.
        J Health Commun. 2013; 18: 1449-1464https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.798374
        • Nolan R.P.
        • Liu S.
        • Shoemaker J.K.
        • et al.
        Therapeutic benefit of internet-based lifestyle counselling for hypertension.
        Can J Cardiol. 2012; 28: 390-396https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2012.02.012
        • Wangberg S.C.
        An Internet-based diabetes self-care intervention tailored to self-efficacy.
        Health Educ Res. 2008; 23: 170-179https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cym014
        • Green B.B.
        • Cook A.J.
        • Ralston J.D.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, Web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial.
        JAMA. 2008; 299: 2857-2867https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.24.2857
        • Liu S.
        • Dunford S.D.
        • Leung Y.W.
        • et al.
        Reducing blood pressure with Internet-based interventions: a meta-analysis.
        Can J Cardiol. 2013; 29: 613-621https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2013.02.007
        • Webb T.L.
        • Joseph J.
        • Yardley L.
        • Michie S.
        Using the Internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy.
        J Med Internet Res. 2010; 12: e4https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1376
        • Miller W.R.
        • Rollnick S.
        Ten things that motivational interviewing is not.
        Behav Cogn Psychother. 2009; 37: 129-140https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465809005128
        • Moher D.
        • Hopewell S.
        • Schulz K.F.
        • et al.
        CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63: e1-e37https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004
        • Rabi D.M.
        • Daskalopoulou S.S.
        • Padwal R.S.
        • et al.
        The 2011 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, and therapy.
        Can J Cardiol. 2011; 27: 415-433https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2011.03.015
        • Thompson F.E.
        • Subar A.F.
        • Brown C.C.
        • et al.
        Cognitive research enhances accuracy of food frequency questionnaire reports: results of an experimental validation study.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2002; 102: 212-225https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90050-7
        • Liu S.
        • Brooks D.
        • Thomas S.
        • Eysenbach G.
        • Nolan R.P.
        Lifesource XL-18 pedometer for measuring steps under controlled and free-living conditions.
        J Sports Sci. 2015; 33: 1001-1006https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.981847
        • Tremblay M.S.
        • Warburton D.E.
        • Janssen I.
        • et al.
        New Canadian physical activity guidelines.
        Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011; 36: 36-46https://doi.org/10.1139/H11-009
      1. Government of Canada. Canada’s Food Guide. www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/food-guide-aliment/index-eng.php. Updated 2016. Accessed February 1, 2018.

        • Park M.J.
        • Kim H.S.
        • Kim K.S.
        Cellular phone and Internet-based individual intervention on blood pressure and obesity in obese patients with hypertension.
        Int J Med Inform. 2009; 78: 704-710https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.06.004
        • Prochaska J.O.
        • Velicer W.F.
        The transtheoretical model of health behavior change.
        Am J Health Promot. 1997; 12: 38-48https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38
        • Laforge R.G.
        • Velicer W.F.
        • Richmond R.L.
        • Owen N.
        Stage distributions for five health behaviors in the United States and Australia.
        Prev Med. 1999; 28: 61-74https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1998.0384
        • Ganguli M.
        • Lytle M.E.
        • Reynolds M.D.
        • Dodge H.H.
        Random versus volunteer selection for a community-based study.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998; 53: M39-M46https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/53A.1.M39
        • Sweet S.N.
        • Fortier M.S.
        Improving physical activity and dietary behaviours with single or multiple health behaviour interventions? A synthesis of meta-analyses and reviews.
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010; 7: 1720-1743https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7041720