Advertisement

Health Warning Labels Correct Parents’ Misperceptions About Sugary Drink Options

      Introduction

      Noncarbonated sugar-sweetened beverages, such as fruit drinks, sports drinks, and sweetened teas are increasingly promoted to and consumed by youth. These beverages may be perceived as healthier options than soda. To educate consumers about beverages high in added sugar, several cities and states have proposed policies mandating health warning labels on sugar-sweetened beverages.

      Methods

      In 2015, a total of 2,381 parents were randomized to a no label, calorie label, or warning label condition. An online survey asked about the healthfulness of different beverages, and asked parents to select a beverage for their child in a choice task. Regressions compared the warning and calorie label groups to the control group and measured mediating effects of health beliefs on beverage choice. Data were analyzed in 2016.

      Results

      Parents viewed fruit drinks, sports drinks, and sweetened teas as healthier and less likely to cause disease than soda. Compared with no label, warning labels significantly increased parents’ risk perceptions for all beverages except soda. Warning labels significantly reduced the odds of selecting fruit drinks for the child (OR=0.42, 95% CI=0.32, 0.56), and this effect was mediated by changes in health beliefs and risk perceptions.

      Conclusions

      Fruit drinks, sports drinks, and sweetened teas are increasingly promoted to youth. Parents believe these beverages are healthier and less likely to cause disease than soda, and warning labels may correct these misperceptions.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rosinger A.
        • Herrick K.
        • Gahche J.
        • Park S.
        Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among U.S. youth, 2011–2014.
        NCHS Data Brief. 2017; 271: 1-8
        • Malik V.S.
        • Pan A.
        • Willett W.C.
        • Hu F.B.
        Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2013; 98: 1084-1102https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.058362
        • Hu F.B.
        Resolved: there is sufficient scientific evidence that decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption will reduce the prevalence of obesity and obesity-related diseases.
        Obes Rev. 2013; 14: 606-619https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12040
        • Evens E.W.
        • Hayes C.
        • Palmer C.A.
        • Bermudez O.I.
        • Cohen S.A.
        • Must A.
        Dietary intake and severe early childhood caries in low-income, young children.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013; 113: 1057-1061https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2013.03.014
        • Marshall T.A.
        • Levy S.M.
        • Broffitt B.
        • et al.
        Dental caries and beverage consumption in young children.
        Pediatrics. 2003; 112: e184-e191https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.3.e184
        • Carwile J.L.
        • Willett W.C.
        • Spiegelman D.
        • et al.
        Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and age at menarche in a prospective study of U.S. girls.
        Hum Reprod. 2015; 30: 675-683https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu349
        • Hur Y.I.
        • Park H.
        • Kang J.H.
        • et al.
        Associations between sugar intake from different food sources and adiposity or cardio-metabolic risk in childhood and adolescence: the Korean child-adolescent cohort study.
        Nutrients. 2015; 8: 20https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8010020
        • Mirmiran P.
        • Yuzbashian E.
        • Asghari G.
        • Hosseinpour-Niazi S.
        • Azizi F.
        Consumption of sugar sweetened beverage is associated with incidence of metabolic syndrome in Tehranian children and adolescents.
        Nutr Metab (Lond). 2015; 12: 25https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-015-0021-6
        • Bleich S.N.
        • Vercammen K.A.
        • Koma J.W.
        • Li Z.
        Trends in beverage consumption among children and adults, 2003–2014.
        Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018; 26: 432-441https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22056
        • Han E.
        • Powell L.M.
        Consumption patterns of sugar-sweetened beverages in the United States.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013; 113: 43-53https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2012.09.016
        • Munsell C.R.
        • Harris J.L.
        • Sarda V.
        • Schwartz M.B.
        Parents’ beliefs about the healthfulness of sugary drink options: opportunities to address misperceptions.
        Public Health Nutr. 2015; 19: 46-54https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980015000397
        • Hennessy M.
        • Bleakley A.
        • Piotrowski J.T.
        • Mallya G.
        • Jordan A.
        Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption by adult caregivers and their children: the role of drink features and advertising exposure.
        Health Educ Behav. 2015; 42: 677-686https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198115577379
        • Zytnick D.
        • Park S.
        • Onufrak S.J.
        Child and caregiver attitudes about sports drinks and weekly sports drink intake among U.S. youth.
        Am J Health Promot. 2016; 30: e110-e119https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.140103-QUAN-8
        • Kit B.K.
        • Fakhouri T.H.
        • Park S.
        • Nielsen S.J.
        • Ogden C.L.
        Trends in sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among youth and adults in the United States: 1999–2010.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2013; 98: 180-188https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.057943
      1. Senate Bill-1000. Public Health: sugar-sweetened beverages: safety warnings. http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml. Accessed February 20, 2017.

      2. Warning Labels on Sugary Drinks: AHA Policy Position and Issue Messaging. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association. www.heart.org/idc/groups/ahaecc-public/@wcm/@adv/documents/downloadable/ucm_482397.pdf. Accessed November 8, 2016.

      3. Sugar-sweetened beverage warning for advertisements. Ordinance No. 100-15. Article 42, Division 1 Sections 4200-06: Sugar sweetened beverage warning ordinance. www.sfbos.org/ftp/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/ordinances15/o0100-15.pdf. Accessed November 24, 2015.

      4. Egelko B. San Francisco’s soda law blocked by appeals court. SF Gate. www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-s-soda-labeling-law-blocked-by-12210303.php. Published September 19, 2017. Accessed January 2, 2017.

        • Roberto C.A.
        • Wong D.
        • Musicus A.
        • Hammond D.
        The influence of sugar-sweetened beverage health warning labels on parents’ choices.
        Pediatrics. 2016; 137: e20153185https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-3185
        • VanEpps E.M.
        • Roberto C.A.
        The influence of sugar-sweetened beverage warnings: a randomized trial of adolescents’ choices and beliefs.
        Am J Prev Med. 2016; 51: 664-672https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.010
        • Bollard T.
        • Maubach N.
        • Walker N.
        • Ni Mhurchu C.
        Effects of plain packaging, warning labels, and taxes on young people’s predicted sugar-sweetened beverage preferences: an experimental study.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016; 13: 95https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0421-7
        • Oliver R.L.
        A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions.
        J Mark Res. 1980; 17: 460-469https://doi.org/10.2307/3150499
        • McPeek R.W.
        • Edwards J.D.
        Expectancy disconfirmation and attitude change.
        J Soc Psychol. 1975; 96: 193-208https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1975.9923285
        • Liao C.
        • Liu C.C.
        • Liu Y.P.
        • To P.L.
        • Lin H.N.
        Applying the expectancy disconfirmation and regret theories to online consumer behavior.
        Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011; 14: 241-246https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0236
        • Pizam A.
        • Milman A.
        Predicting satisfaction among first time visitors to a designation by using the expectancy disconfirmation theory.
        Int J Hosp Manag. 1993; 12: 197-209https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4319(93)90010-7
        • Cardello A.V.
        • Sawyer F.M.
        Effects of disconfirmed consumer expectations on food acceptability.
        J Sens Stud. 1992; 7: 253-277https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1992.tb00194.x
      5. CDC, Division of Nutrition. Physical activity, and obesity adult obesity facts. www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html. Updated June 16, 2015. Accessed March 30, 2018.

      6. Initiatives and advocacy: clear calories for consumers. American Beverage Association. www.ameribev.org/education-resources/blog/post/clear-calories-for-consumers/. Accessed March 30, 2018.

        • Andrews C.J.
        • Netemeyer R.G.
        • Burton S.
        Consumer generalization of nutrient content claims in advertising.
        J Mark. 1998; 62: 62-75https://doi.org/10.2307/1252287
        • Burton S.
        • Creyer E.H.
        • Kees J.
        • Huggins K.A.
        Attacking the obesity epidemic: the potential health benefits of providing nutrition information in restaurants.
        Am J Public Health. 2006; 96: 1669-1675https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.054973
        • Kozup J.C.
        • Creyer E.
        • Burton S.
        Making healthful food choices: the influence of health claims and nutrition information on consumer’s evaluations of packaged food products and restaurant menu items.
        J Mark. 2003; 67: 19-34https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.19.18608
        • Andrew J.C.
        • Burton S.
        • Kees J.
        Is simpler always better? Consumer evaluations of front-of-package nutrition symbols.
        J Public Policy Mark. 2011; 30: 175-190https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.30.2.175
        • Karlson K.B.
        • Holm A.
        Decomposing primary and secondary effects: a new decomposition method.
        Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2011; 29: 221-237https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2010.12.005
      7. Harris JL, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD, et al. Sugary drink FACTS: evaluating sugary drink nutrition and marketing to youth. www.healthybeveragesinchildcare.org/qa/SugaryDrinkFACTS_Report.pdf. Published 2011. Accessed March 30, 2018.

        • Harris J.L.
        • Thompson J.M.
        • Schwartz M.B.
        • et al.
        Nutrition-related claims on children’s cereals: what do they mean to parents and do they influence willingness to buy?.
        Public Health Nutr. 2011; 14: 2207-2212https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980011001741
        • Moran A.J.
        • Block J.P.
        • Goshev S.G.
        • Bleich S.N.
        • Roberto C.A.
        Trends in nutrient content of children’s items on U.S. chain restaurant menus.
        Am J Prev Med. 2017; 52: 284-291https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.007
        • Taber D.R.
        • Chriqui J.F.
        • Vuillaume R.
        • Kelder S.H.
        • Chaloupka F.J.
        The association between state bans on soda only and adolescent substitutions with other sugar-sweetened beverages: a cross-sectional study.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015; 12: S7https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-12-S1-S7
        • Hammond D.
        Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review.
        Tob Control. 2011; 20: 327-337https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2010.037630
        • Cantor J.
        • Torres A.
        • Abrams C.
        • Elbel B.
        Five years later: awareness of New York City’s calorie labels declined, with no changes in calories purchased.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2015; 34: 1893-1900https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0623