American College of Preventive Medicine Position Statement: Reproductive Health Care

      The American College of Preventive Medicine (ACPM) recommends that state and federal governments, and non-governmental organizations ensure access to comprehensive, coordinated, and high-quality reproductive health services to include education; emergency, short-, and long-term reversible contraception; sterilization; and abortion. ACPM stands with other organizations in opposing legislative restrictions that decrease access to contraception and safe abortion for all.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • WHO
        The World Health Report 2005: Make Every Mother and Child Count.
        WHO, 2005
        • Bearak J
        • Popinchalk A
        • Alkema L
        • Sedgh G
        Global, regional, and subregional trends in unintended pregnancy and its outcomes from 1990 to 2014: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model.
        Lancet Glob Health. 2018; 6: e380-e389
        • Finer LB
        • Zolna MR
        Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011.
        N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 843-852
        • Bernstein S
        • Hansen CJ
        Public Choices, Private Decisions: Sexual and Reproductive Health and the Millennium Development Goals.
        World Bank, 2006
        • UN. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015
      1. (UN. Millennium Development Goals indicators)
        • Sachs J
        • Schmidt-Traub G
        • Kroll C
        • Durand-Delacre D
        • Teksoz K
        SDG Index and Dashboards Report 2017.
        • Guttmacher Institute
        Adding it up: investing in contraception and maternal and newborn health, 2017.
        • Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
        Healthy People 2020: family planning.
        • Kilfoyle KA
        • Vitko M
        • O'Conor R
        • Bailey SC
        Health literacy and women's reproductive health: a systematic review.
        J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016; 25: 1237-1255
        • Biggs MA
        • Foster DG
        Misunderstanding the risk of conception from unprotected and protected sex.
        Womens Health Issues. 2013; 23: e47-e53
        • Miller E
        • Decker MR
        • McCauley HL
        • et al.
        Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy.
        Contraception. 2010; 81: 316-322
        • Sarkar NN
        The impact of intimate partner violence on women's reproductive health and pregnancy outcome.
        J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore). 2008; 28: 266-271
        • Danielle Iuliano A
        • Speizer IS
        • Santelli J
        • Kendall C
        Reasons for contraceptive nonuse at first sex and unintended pregnancy.
        Am J Health Behav. 2006; 30: 92-102
        • Sundaram A
        • Vaughan B
        • Kost K
        • et al.
        Contraceptive failure in the United States: estimates from the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017; 49: 7-16
        • Trussell J
        Contraceptive failure in the United States.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 397-404
        • Jones RK
        Reported contraceptive use in the month of becoming pregnant among U.S. abortion patients in 2000 and 2014.
        Contraception. 2018; 97: 309-312
        • Dehlendorf C
        • Levy K
        • Ruskin R
        • Steinauer J
        Health care providers’ knowledge about contraceptive evidence: a barrier to quality family planning care?.
        Contraception. 2010; 81: 292-298
        • Jerman J
        • Frohwirth L
        • Kavanaugh ML
        • Blades N
        Barriers to abortion care and their consequences for patients traveling for services: qualitative findings from two states.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017; 49: 95-102
        • Hebert LE
        • Fabiyi C
        • Hasselbacher LA
        • Starr K
        • Gilliam ML
        Variation in pregnancy options counseling and referrals, and reported proximity to abortion services, among publicly funded family planning facilities.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016; 48: 65-71
        • Roberts S
        • Gould H
        • Kimport K
        • Weitz T
        • Foster DG
        Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States.
        Womens Health Issues. 2014; 24: e211-e218
        • Jones RK
        • Jerman J
        Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2014.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017; 49: 17-27
        • Kost K
        • Lindberg L
        Pregnancy intentions, maternal behaviors, and infant health: investigating relationships with new measures and propensity score analysis.
        Demography. 2015; 52: 83-111
        • Lindberg L
        • Maddow-Zimet I
        • Kost K
        • Lincoln A
        Pregnancy intentions and maternal and child health: an analysis of longitudinal data in Oklahoma.
        Matern Child Health J. 2015; 19: 1087-1096
        • Dibaba Y
        • Fantahun M
        • Hindin MJ
        The effects of pregnancy intention on the use of antenatal care services: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Reprod Health. 2013; 10: 50
        • Williams L
        • Zapata LB
        • D'Angelo DV
        • Harrison L
        • Morrow B
        Associations between preconception counseling and maternal behaviors before and during pregnancy.
        Matern Child Health J. 2012; 16: 1854-1861
        • Naimi TS
        • Lipscomb LE
        • Brewer RD
        • Gilbert BC
        Binge drinking in the preconception period and the risk of unintended pregnancy: implications for women and their children.
        Pediatrics. 2003; 111: 1136-1141
        • Sable MR
        • Spencer JC
        • Stockbauer JW
        • Schramm WF
        • Howell V
        • Herman AA
        Pregnancy wantedness and adverse pregnancy outcomes: differences by race and Medicaid status.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1997; 29: 76-81
        • Goldthwaite LM
        • Duca L
        • Johnson RK
        • Ostendorf D
        • Sheeder J
        Adverse birth outcomes in Colorado: assessing the impact of a statewide initiative to prevent unintended pregnancy.
        Am J Public Health. 2015; 105: e60-e66
        • Shah PS
        • Balkhair T
        • Ohlsson A
        • Beyene J
        • Scott F
        • Frick C
        Intention to become pregnant and low birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review.
        Matern Child Health J. 2011; 15: 205-216
        • Mohllajee AP
        • Curtis KM
        • Morrow B
        • Marchbanks PA
        Pregnancy intention and its relationship to birth and maternal outcomes.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 678-686
        • Kost K
        • Landry DJ
        • Darroch J
        The effects of pregnancy planning status on birth outcomes and infant care.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1998; 30: 223-230
        • Taylor JS
        • Cabral HJ
        Are women with an unintended pregnancy less likely to breastfeed?.
        J Fam Pract. 2002; 51: 431-436
        • Mack JM
        • Chavez JM
        Cumulative effects of maternal age and unintended pregnancy on offspring aggression.
        J Interpers Violence. 2014; 29: 2931-2950
        • David HP.
        Born unwanted, 35 years later: the Prague Study.
        Reprod Health Matters. 2006; 14: 181-190
        • Baydar N
        Consequences for children of their birth planning status.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1995; 27 (245.): 228-234
        • Canning D
        • Raja S
        • Yazbeck AS
        Africa's demographic transition: dividend or disaster?.
        The World Bank, 2015
        • Reher DS
        Economic and social implications of the demographic transition.
        Popul Dev Rev. 2011; 37: 11-33
        • Starbird E
        • Norton M
        • Marcus R
        Investing in family planning: key to achieving the sustainable development goals.
        Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016; 4: 191-210
        • Bongaarts J
        The impact of family planning programs on unmet need and demand for contraception.
        Stud Fam Plann. 2014; 45: 247-262
        • UN Population Fund
        Sexual and Reproductive Health for All: Reducing Poverty, Advancing Development and Protecting Human Rights.
        UN Population Fund, New York, NY2010
        • Landry DJ
        • Wei J
        • Frost JJ
        Public and private providers’ involvement in improving their patients’ contraceptive use.
        Contraception. 2008; 78: 42-51
        • O'Brien E
        Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in Vermont: A Survey Based Assessment of Current Knowledge of Providers of Women of Reproductive Age. [thesis].
        University of Vermont, Burlington2016
        • Frost J
        • Lindberg L
        • Finer L
        Young adults’ contraceptive knowledge, norms and attitudes: associations with risk of unintended pregnancy.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 44: 107-116
        • Kakaiya R
        • Lopez LL
        • Nelson AL
        Women's perceptions of contraceptive efficacy and safety.
        Contracept Reprod Med. 2017; 2: 19
        • Rocca CH
        • Harper CC
        Do racial and ethnic differences in contraceptive attitudes and knowledge explain disparities in method use?.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 44: 150-158
        • Craig AD
        • Dehlendorf C
        • Borrero S
        • Harper CC
        • Rocca CH
        Exploring young adults’ contraceptive knowledge and attitudes: disparities by race/ethnicity and age.
        Womens Health Issues. 2014; 24: e281-e289
        • Kaye K
        • Suellentrop K
        • Sloup C
        The Fog Zone: How Misperceptions, Magical Thinking, and Ambivalence Put Young Adults at Risk for Unplanned Pregnancy.
        Power to Decide (formerly National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy), Washington, DCPublished 2009
        • Shartzer A
        • Courtot B
        • McMorrow S
        • Benatar S
        • Kenney G
        Knowledge Gaps and Misinformation about Birth Control Methods Persist in 2016.
        Urban Institute, 2016
        • Russo JA
        • Miller E
        • Gold MA
        Myths and misconceptions about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).
        J Adolesc Health. 2013; 52: S14-S21
        • Thompson K
        • Gelt M
        • Stern L
        • Speidel JJ
        • Harper C
        The clinician/health educator team and counseling for long-acting, reversible contraception.
        Contraception. 2013; 88: 301
        • Harper CC
        • Rocca CH
        • Thompson KM
        • et al.
        Reductions in pregnancy rates in the USA with long-acting reversible contraception: a cluster randomised trial.
        Lancet. 2015; 386: 562-568
        • Rosenfeld E
        • Callegari LS
        • Sileanu FE
        • et al.
        Racial and ethnic disparities in contraceptive knowledge among women veterans in the ECUUN study.
        Contraception. 2017; 96: 54-61
      2. Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. The Contraceptive Choice Project. Accessed June 24, 2018.

        • Guttmacher Institute
        Fact Sheet: Unintended Pregnancy in the United States.
        • Marseille E
        • Mirzazadeh A
        • Biggs MA
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of school-based teen pregnancy prevention programs in the USA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Prev Sci. 2018; 19: 468-489
        • Oringanje C
        • Meremikwu MM
        • Eko H
        • Esu E
        • Meremikwu A
        • Ehiri JE
        Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 2CD005215
        • Kohler PK
        • Manhart LE
        • Lafferty WE
        Abstinence-only and comprehensive sex education and the initiation of sexual activity and teen pregnancy.
        J Adolesc Health. 2008; 42: 344-351
        • Chin HB
        • Sipe TA
        • Elder R
        • et al.
        The effectiveness of group-based comprehensive risk-reduction and abstinence education interventions to prevent or reduce the risk of adolescent pregnancy, human immunodeficiency virus, and sexually transmitted infections.
        Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42: 272-294
        • Stanger-Hall KF
        • Hall DW
        Abstinence-only education and teen pregnancy rates: why we need comprehensive sex education in the U.S.
        PLoS One. 2011; 6: e24658
        • Association of Reproductive Health Professionals
        Providers’ perspectives. Perceived barriers to contraceptive use in youth and young adults: final report.
        • Schreiber CA
        • Harwood BJ
        • Switzer GE
        • Creinin MD
        • Reeves MF
        • Ness RB
        Training and attitudes about contraceptive management across primary care specialties: a survey of graduating residents.
        Contraception. 2006; 73: 618-622
        • Frost J
        • Frohwirth L
        • Zolna M
        Guttmacher Institute: contraceptive needs and services, 2014 update.
        • Frost J
        • Finer LB
        • Tapales A
        The impact of publicly funded family planning clinic services on unintended pregnancies and government cost savings.
        J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008; 19: 778-796
        • Monea E
        • Thomas A
        Unintended pregnancy and taxpayer spending.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011; 43: 88-93
        • Sonfield A.
        Beyond preventing unplanned pregnancy: the broader benefits of publicly funded family planning services.
        Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2014; 17
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        ACOG Committee opinion: access to contraception.
        • Frost J
        • Sonfield A
        • Zolna M
        • Finer LB
        Return on investment: a fuller assessment of the benefits and cost savings of the U.S. publicly funded family planning program.
        Milbank Q. 2014; 92: 696-749
        • Foster DG
        • Hulett D
        • Bradsberry M
        • Darney P
        • Policar M
        Number of oral contraceptive pill packages dispensed and subsequent unintended pregnancies.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 566-572
      3. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Colorado's success with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Department of Public Health and Environment.

        • Ricketts S
        • Klingler G
        • Schwalberg R
        Game change in Colorado: widespread use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and rapid decline in births among young, low-income women.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014; 46: 125-132
        • Goodman M
        • Onwumere O
        • Milam L
        • Peipert JF
        Reducing health disparities by removing cost, access, and knowledge barriers.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 216: 382.e1-382.e5
      4. California Department of Health Care Services. Family PACT. Accessed June 24, 2018.

        • Chabot MJ
        • Navarro S
        • Swann D
        • Darney P
        • Thiel de Bocanegra H
        Association of access to publicly funded family planning services with adolescent birthrates in California counties.
        Am J Public Health. 2014; 104: e1-e6
        • Foster DG
        • Biggs MA
        • Malvin J
        • Bradsberry M
        • Darney P
        • Brindis CD
        Cost-savings from the provision of specific contraceptive methods in 2009.
        Womens Health Issues. 2013; 23: e265-e271
        • Howell M
        • Starrs A
        For women of color, access to vital health services is threatened.
        Guttmacher Institute, Published 2017
        • Guttmacher Institute
        Dramatic gains in insurance coverage for women of reproductive age are now in jeopardy.
        • HHS Office of Population Affairs
        Title X family planning.
        • de Bocanegra HT
        • Maguire F
        • Hulett D
        • Horsley K
        • Puffer M
        • Brindis CD
        Enhancing service delivery through Title X funding: findings from California.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 44: 262-269
        • Hasstedt K
        Four big threats to the Title X Family Planning Program: examining the administration's new funding opportunity announcement.
        Health Affairs Blog. Publish 2018
        • Hasstedt K
        Beyond the rhetoric: the real-world impact of attacks on planned parenthood and Title X.
        Guttmacher Institute, Published 2017
        • Hasstedt K
        Understanding Planned Parenthood's critical role in the nation's family planning safety net.
        Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2017; 20
        • American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists
        Clinical practice: expanding coverage and reimbursement for immediate postpartum LARC—ACOG.
        • National Women's Law Center
        Pharmacy refusals 101—NWLC.
        • Abelson R
        Growth of Catholic hospitals may limit access to reproductive care.
        New York Times, 2012
      5. (Supreme Court of the U.S. Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services et al v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.; 2014.) (Accessed June 14,)
        • Office of Adolescent Health
        Trends in teen pregnancy and childbearing.
        HHS. Published 2016;
        • Kost K
        • Maddow-Zimet I
        • Arpaia A
        Pregnancies, births and abortions among adolescents and young women in the United States, 2013: national and state trends by age, race and ethnicity.
        • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
        The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States.
        National Academies Press, Washington, DC2018
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        ACOG Committee opinion: increasing access to abortion.
      6. Induced abortion worldwide. Guttmacher Institute. Accessed June 24, 2018.

        • WHO
        Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems.
        2nd edition. WHO, 2012
        • Ganatra B
        • Gerdts C
        • Rossier C
        • et al.
        Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010–14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model.
        Lancet. 2017; 390: 2372-2381
        • Starrs AM
        • Ezeh AC
        • Barker G
        • et al.
        Accelerate progress—sexual and reproductive health and rights for all: report of the Guttmacher– Lancet Commission.
        Lancet. 2018; 391: 2642-2692
        • Grimes DA
        • Benson J
        • Singh S
        • et al.
        Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic.
        Lancet. 2006; 368: 1908-1919
        • Berer M.
        National laws and unsafe abortion: the parameters of change.
        Reprod Health Matters. 2004; 12: 1-8
        • WHO
        Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2008.
        6th ed. WHO, 2011
        • Say L
        • Chou D
        • Gemmill A
        • et al.
        Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis.
        Lancet Glob Health. 2014; 2: e323-e333
        • Bartlett LA
        • Berg CJ
        • Shulman HB
        • et al.
        Risk factors for legal induced abortion–related mortality in the United States.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103: 729-737
        • Zane S
        • Creanga AA
        • Berg CJ
        • et al.
        Abortion-related mortality in the United States.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126: 258-265
        • Raymond EG
        • Grimes DA
        The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119: 215-219
        • Briozzo L
        • Gómez Ponce de León R
        • Tomasso G
        Overall and abortion-related maternal mortality rates in Uruguay over the past 25 years and their association with policies and actions aimed at protecting women's rights.
        Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016; 134: S20-S23
        • Cohen S.
        Facts and consequences: legality, incidence and safety of abortion worldwide.
        Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2009; 12 (Accessed June 9, 2018)
        • Grimes DA
        • Brandon LG
        Every Third Woman in America: How Legal Abortion Transformed Our Nation.
        Daymark Publishing, Carolina Beach, NC2014
        • Induced termination of pregnancy before and after Roe v Wade
        Trends in the mortality and morbidity of women. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association.
        JAMA. 1992; 268: 3231-3239
        • Center for Reproductive Rights
        Abortion worldwide: 20 years of reform.
        • Referendum Ireland
      7. (UN Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. International Safe Abortion Day—Thursday 28 September 2017.)
        • Guttmacher Institute
        Restricting Insurance Coverage of Abortion.
        • Nash E
        • Gold RB
        • Rathbun G
        • Vierboom Y
        Laws affecting reproductive health and rights: 2014 state policy review.
        Guttmacher Institute, 2014
        • Guttmacher Institute
        Targeted regulation of abortion providers.
        Guttmacher Institute, 2018
        • Nash E
        • Gold RB
        • Mohammed L
        • Cappello O
        • Ansari-Thomas Z
        Laws affecting reproductive health and rights: state policy trends at midyear, 2017.
        Guttmacher Institute, 2017
        • Gold RB
        • Nash E
        Flouting the facts: state abortion restrictions flying in the face of science.
        Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2017; 20
        • Vandewalker I.
        Abortion and informed consent: how biased counseling laws mandate violations of medical ethics.
        Michigan J Gend Law. 2012; 19
        • Guttmacher Institute
        Refusing to provide health services.
        Guttmacher Institute, 2018
        • Center for Reproductive Rights
        Federal District Court ends legal challenge to unconstitutional Arizona law forcing doctors to lie to women, ensuring law will never take effect.
        Published 2016 (Center for Reproductive Rights)
        • Guttmacher Institute
        State laws and policies: requirements for ultrasound.
        Guttmacher Institute, 2018
        • The Associated Press
        Utah to require anesthesia in some abortions.
        New York Times. March 28, 2016;
        • Health and Human Services Department
        Federal Register: compliance with statutory program integrity requirements.
        • Blanchfield L.
        Abortion and family planning-related provisions in U.S. foreign assistance law and policy.
        • Elbagir N
        • Leposo L
        • Mackintosh E
        Trump's ban on global abortion funding has led to more abortions.
        CNN, 2005
        • Hyde H
        H.Amdt.185 to H.R.2518 - 103rd Congress (1993-1994). June 1993.
        • Donovan M
        In real life: federal restrictions on abortion coverage and the women they impact.
        Guttmacher Institute, 2017
        • Foster AM
        • Arnott G
        • Parniak S
        • LaRoche KJ
        • Trussell J
        No exceptions: documenting the abortion experiences of U.S. Peace Corps volunteers.
        Am J Public Health. 2015; 105: 41-48
        • Arnold SB.
        Reproductive rights denied: the Hyde Amendment and access to abortion for Native American women using Indian Health Service facilities.
        Am J Public Health. 2014; 104: 1892-1893
        • Kacanek D
        • Dennis A
        • Miller K
        • Blanchard K
        Medicaid funding for abortion: providers’ experiences with cases involving rape, incest and life endangerment.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010; 42: 79-86
        • Boonstra H.
        The heart of the matter: public funding of abortion for poor women in the United States.
        Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2007; 10
        • Trussell J
        • Menken J
        • Lindheim BL
        • Vaughan B
        The impact of restricting Medicaid financing for abortion.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1980; 12 (127–130): 120-123
        • Ely GE
        • Hales T
        • Jackson DL
        • Maguin E
        • Hamilton G
        The undue burden of paying for abortion: an exploration of abortion fund cases.
        Soc Work Health Care. 2017; 56: 99-114
        • Roberts S
        • Biggs MA
        • Chibber KS
        • Gould H
        • Rocca CH
        • Foster DG
        Risk of violence from the man involved in the pregnancy after receiving or being denied an abortion.
        BMC Med. 2014; 12: 144
        • Finer LB
        • Frohwirth LF
        • Dauphinee LA
        • Singh S
        • Moore AM
        Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States.
        Contraception. 2006; 74: 334-344
      8. Guttmacher Institute. Guttmacher data center. Accessed June 14, 2018.

        • Upadhyay UD
        • Weitz TA
        • Jones RK
        • Barar RE
        • Foster DG
        Denial of abortion because of provider gestational age limits in the United States.
        Am J Public Health. 2014; 104: 1687-1694
        • Foster DG
        • Biggs MA
        • Ralph L
        • Gerdts C
        • Roberts S
        • Glymour MM
        Socioeconomic outcomes of women who receive and women who are denied wanted abortions in the United States.
        Am J Public Health. 2018; 108: 407-413
        • Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice
        A new vision for advancing our movement for reproductive health, reproductive rights and reproductive justice.
      9. National Women's Law Center. NWLC resources on poverty, income, and health insurance in 2016—NWLC. Accessed June 9, 2018.