Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 57, ISSUE 3, P408-416, September 2019

Sitting Time and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      Context

      Whether physical activity attenuates the association of total daily sitting time with cardiovascular disease and diabetes incidence is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the association of total daily sitting time with cardiovascular disease and diabetes with and without adjustment for physical activity.

      Evidence acquisition

      PubMed, Web of Science, BASE, MEDLINE, Academic Search Elite, and ScienceDirect were searched for prospective studies, published between January 1, 1989, and February 15, 2019, examining the association of total daily sitting time with cardiovascular disease or diabetes outcomes. Data extraction and study quality assessments were conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using a fixed-effects model. The quality assessment and meta-analysis procedures were completed in 2018.

      Evidence synthesis

      Nine studies with 448,285 participants were included. A higher total daily sitting time was associated with a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular disease (HR=1.29, 95% CI=1.27, 1.30, p<0.001) and diabetes (HR=1.13, 95% CI=1.04, 1.22, p<0.001) incidence when not adjusted for physical activity. The increased risk for diabetes was unaffected when adjusting for physical activity (HR=1.11, 95% CI=1.01, 1.19, p<0.001). For cardiovascular disease, the increased risk was attenuated but remained significant (HR=1.14, 95% CI=1.04, 1.23, p<0.001).

      Conclusions

      Higher levels of total daily sitting time are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes, independent of physical activity. Reductions in total daily sitting may be recommended in public health guidelines.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Healy GN
        • Matthews CE
        • Dunstan DW
        • Winkler EA
        • Owen N
        Sedentary time and cardio-metabolic biomarkers in U.S. adults: NHANES 2003–06.
        Eur Heart J. 2011; 32: 590‒597
        • Tremblay MS
        • Aubert S
        • Barnes JD
        • et al.
        Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN). Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017; 14: 75
        • Grontved A
        • Hu FB
        Television viewing and risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis.
        JAMA. 2011; 305: 2448‒2455
        • Wilmot EG
        • Edwardson CL
        • Achana FA
        • et al.
        Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Diabetologia. 2012; 55: 2895‒2905
        • WHO
        Global strategy of diet, physical activity and health.
        Published 2010
        • Ekelund U
        • Steene-Johannessen J
        • Brown WJ
        • et al.
        Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women.
        Lancet. 2016; 388: 1302‒1310
        • Patterson R
        • McNamara E
        • Tainio M
        • et al.
        Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis.
        Eur J Epidemiol. 2018; 33: 811‒829
        • Biswas A
        • Oh PI
        • Faulkner GE
        • et al.
        Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162: 123‒132
        • Moher D
        • Liberati A
        • Tetzlaff J
        • Altman DG
        • PRISMA Group
        Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement.
        BMJ. 2009; 339: b2535
        • Stroup DF
        • Berlin JA
        • Morton SC
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting.
        JAMA. 2000; 283: 2008‒2012
        • von Elm E
        • Altman DG
        • Egger M
        • et al.
        The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61: 344‒349
        • DerSimonian R
        • Laird N
        Meta-analysis in clinical trials.
        Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7: 177‒188
        • Higgins JP
        • Thompson SG
        • Deeks JJ
        • Altman DG
        Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.
        BMJ. 2003; 327: 557‒560
        • Deeks J
        • Higgins J
        • Altman D
        Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses.
        in: Higgins JP Green S Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Published 2008
        • Asvold BO
        • Midthjell K
        • Krokstad S
        • Rangul V
        • Bauman A
        Prolonged sitting may increase diabetes risk in physically inactive individuals: an 11 year follow-up of the HUNT Study, Norway.
        Diabetologia. 2017; 60: 830‒835
        • Manini TM
        • Lamonte MJ
        • Seguin RA
        • et al.
        Modifying effect of obesity on the association between sitting and incident diabetes in post-menopausal women.
        Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014; 22: 1133‒1141
        • Petersen CB
        • Bauman A
        • Tolstrup JS
        Total sitting time and the risk of incident diabetes in Danish adults (the DANHES cohort) over 5 years: a prospective study.
        Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50: 1382‒1387
        • Nguyen B
        • Bauman A
        • Ding D
        Incident type 2 diabetes in a large Australian cohort study: does physical activity or sitting time alter the risk associated with body mass index?.
        J Phys Act Health. 2017; 14: 13‒19
        • Stamatakis E
        • Pulsford RM
        • Brunner EJ
        • et al.
        Sitting behaviour is not associated with incident diabetes over 13 years: the Whitehall II cohort study.
        Br J Sports Med. 2017; 51: 818‒823
        • Jefferis BJ
        • Parsons TJ
        • Sartini C
        • et al.
        Does total volume of physical activity matter more than pattern for onset of CVD? A prospective cohort study of older British men.
        Int J Cardiol. 2019; 278: 267‒272
        • Borodulin K
        • Karki A
        • Laatikainen T
        • Peltonen M
        • Luoto R
        Daily sedentary time and risk of cardiovascular disease: the National FINRISK 2002 study.
        J Phys Act Health. 2015; 12: 904‒908
        • Chomistek AK
        • Manson JE
        • Stefanick ML
        • et al.
        Relationship of sedentary behavior and physical activity to incident cardiovascular disease: results from the Women's Health Initiative.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61: 2346‒2354
        • Herber-Gast GC
        • Jackson CA
        • Mishra GD
        • Brown WJ
        Self-reported sitting time is not associated with incidence of cardiovascular disease in a population-based cohort of mid-aged women.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013; 10: 55
        • Bjork Petersen C
        • Bauman A
        • Gronbaek M
        • et al.
        Total sitting time and risk of myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality in a prospective cohort of Danish adults.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014; 11: 13
        • Stephens BR
        • Granados K
        • Zderic TW
        • Hamilton MT
        • Braun B
        Effects of 1 day of inactivity on insulin action in healthy men and women: interaction with energy intake.
        Metabolism. 2011; 60: 941‒949
        • Lyden K
        • Keadle SK
        • Staudenmayer J
        • Braun B
        • Freedson PS
        Discrete features of sedentary behavior impact cardiometabolic risk factors.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015; 47: 1079‒1086
        • Tremblay MS
        • Colley RC
        • Saunders TJ
        • Healy GN
        • Owen N
        Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle.
        Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010; 35: 725‒740
        • Duvivier BMFM
        • Schaper NC
        • Koster A
        • et al.
        Benefits of substituting sitting with standing and walking in free-living conditions for cardiometabolic risk markers, cognition and mood in overweight adults.
        Front Physiol. 2017; 8: 353
        • Bailey DP
        • Locke CD
        Breaking up prolonged sitting with light-intensity walking improves postprandial glycemia, but breaking up sitting with standing does not.
        J Sci Med Sport. 2015; 18: 294‒298
        • Maylor BD
        • Zakrzewski-Fruer JK
        • Orton CJ
        • Bailey DP
        Beneficial postprandial lipaemic effects of interrupting sedentary time with high-intensity physical activity versus a continuous moderate-intensity physical activity bout: a randomised crossover trial.
        J Sci Med Sport. 2018; 21: 1250‒1255
        • Dunstan DW
        • Kingwell BA
        • Larsen R
        • et al.
        Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses.
        Diabetes Care. 2012; 35: 976‒983
        • Henson J
        • Davies MJ
        • Bodicoat DH
        • et al.
        Breaking up prolonged sitting with standing or walking attenuates the postprandial metabolic response in postmenopausal women: a randomized acute study.
        Diabetes Care. 2016; 39: 130‒138
        • Miyashita M
        • Edamoto K
        • Kidokoro T
        • et al.
        Interrupting sitting time with regular walks attenuates postprandial triglycerides.
        Int J Sports Med. 2016; 37: 97‒103
        • Bergouignan A
        • Latouche C
        • Heywood S
        • et al.
        Frequent interruptions of sedentary time modulates contraction- and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake pathways in muscle: ancillary analysis from randomized clinical trials.
        Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 32044
        • Latouche C
        • Jowett JB
        • Carey AL
        • et al.
        Effects of breaking up prolonged sitting on skeletal muscle gene expression.
        J Appl Physiol 1985. 2013; 114: 453‒460
        • Hamilton MT
        • Hamilton DG
        • Zderic TW
        Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.
        Diabetes. 2007; 56: 2655‒2667
        • Carter S
        • Hartman Y
        • Holder S
        • Thijssen DH
        • Hopkins ND
        Sedentary behavior and cardiovascular disease risk: mediating mechanisms.
        Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2017; 45: 80‒86
        • Chastin SF
        • Culhane B
        • Dall PM
        Comparison of self-reported measure of sitting time (IPAQ) with objective measurement (activPAL).
        Physiol Meas. 2014; 35: 2319‒2328
        • Healy GN
        • Clark BK
        • Winkler EAH
        • et al.
        Measurement of adults’ sedentary time in population-based studies.
        Am J Prev Med. 2011; 41: 216‒227