Rural–Urban Differences in Access to Primary Care: Beyond the Usual Source of Care Provider


      In the U.S., rural residents have poorer health than urban residents and this disadvantage is growing. Therefore, it is important to understand rural–urban differences in access to medical care. This study compared the percentage of individuals with a usual source of care and characteristics of usual source of care providers across 3 urban–rural categories.


      This study identified 51,920 adults from the 2014–2016 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and estimated the percentage with a usual source of care across the rural–urban categories. Then, differences in a variety of provider characteristics were examined. Estimates were weighted to be representative of the U.S. non-institutionalized population and adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, self-rated health, and presence of chronic conditions. Analysis was conducted in 2018 and 2019.


      Compared with metropolitan county residents, residents of the most rural counties were 7 percentage points more likely to have a usual source of care (81% vs 74%), but their providers were 13 percentage points less likely to be physicians (22% vs 35%). Despite having to travel longer to reach their usual source of care providers, residents of the most rural counties were 18 percentage points less likely than metropolitan residents to have usual source of care providers with office hours on nights and weekends (27% vs 39%).


      Rural–urban differences in access to care are complex; there is a rural disadvantage on some dimensions of access but not others. To understand rural–urban disparities in healthcare access, research should move beyond the usual source of care provider as an overall indicator and instead investigate disparities using multiple indicators of access based on theoretically distinct domains.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • James WL
        All rural places are not created equal: revisiting the rural mortality penalty in the United States.
        Am J Public Health. 2014; 104: 2122‒2129
      1. Meit M, Knudson A, Gilbert T, et al. The 2014 update of the rural-urban Chartbook. Rural Health Research & policy centers. Published 2014. Accessed September 4, 2019.

        • Agency for Health care Research and Quality
        National healthcare quality and disparities report: Chartbook on Rural Health Care.
        Agency for Health care Research and Quality, Rockville, MD2017 (Published)
        • Caldwell JT
        • Ford CL
        • Wallace SP
        • Wang MC
        • Takahashi LM
        Intersection of living in a rural versus urban area and race/ethnicity in explaining access to health care in the United States.
        Am J Public Health. 2016; 106: 1463‒1469
        • Caldwell JT
        • Ford CL
        • Wallace SP
        • Wang MC
        • Takahashi LM
        Racial and ethnic residential segregation and access to health care in rural areas.
        Health Place. 2017; 43: 104‒112
        • Reschovsky JD
        • Staiti AB
        Access and quality: does rural America lag behind?.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2005; 24: 1128‒1139
        • Penchansky R
        • Thomas JW
        The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction.
        Med Care. 1981; 19: 127‒140
        • Casey MM
        • Call KT
        • Klingner JM
        Are rural residents less likely to obtain recommended preventive healthcare services?.
        Am J Prev Med. 2001; 21: 182‒188
        • Hale NL
        • Smith M
        • Hardin J
        • Brock-Martin A
        Rural populations and early periodic screening, diagnosis, and treatment services: challenges and opportunities for local public health departments.
        Am J Public Health. 2015; 105: S330‒S336
        • Larson SL
        • Fleishman JA
        Rural-urban differences in usual source of care and ambulatory service use: analyses of national data using Urban Influence Codes.
        Med Care. 2003; 41 (III-65-III–74)
        • Loftus J
        • Allen EM
        • Call KT
        • Everson‐Rose SA
        Rural‐urban differences in access to preventive health care among publicly insured Minnesotans.
        J Rural Health. 2018; 34: s48‒s55
        • Graves JA
        • Mishra P
        • Dittus RS
        • Parikh R
        • Perloff J
        • Buerhaus PI
        Role of geography and nurse practitioner scope-of-practice in efforts to expand primary care system capacity: health reform and the primary care workforce.
        Med Care. 2016; 54: 81‒89
        • Xue Y
        • Kannan V
        • Greener E
        • et al.
        Full scope-of-practice regulation is associated with higher supply of nurse practitioners in rural and primary care health professional shortage counties.
        J Nurs Regul. 2018; 8: 5‒13
        • Cohen JW
        • Monheit AC
        • Beauregard KM
        • et al.
        The Medical Expenditure Panel. Survey: a national health information resource.
        Inquiry. 1996; 33: 373‒389
        • Cohen J
        Design and Methods of the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey Household Component.
        Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD1997 (Published)
        • Parsons VL
        • Moriarity CL
        • Jonas K
        • Moore TF
        • Davis KE
        • Tompkins L
        Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 2006‒2015.
        Vital Health Stat 2. 2014; 165: 1‒53
      2. Agency for Health care Research and Quality, MEPS-HC Panel Design and Collection Process., Published 2018. Accessed September 4, 2019.

        • Chowdhury SR
        • Machlin SR
        • Gwet KL
        Sample designs of the Medical Expenditure Panel survey household component, 1996–2006 and 2007–2016.
        Agency for Health care Research and Quality, Rockville, MD2019 (Published)
      3. Health Resources and Services Administration. User Documentation for the County Area Health Resources File (AHRF) 2016–2017 Release. Published 2017. Accessed October 4, 2019.

      4. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Rural-urban continuum codes documentation. Published 2017. Accessed September 4, 2019.

        • Corbie‐Smith G
        • Flagg EW
        • Doyle JP
        • O'Brien MA
        Influence of usual source of care on differences by race/ethnicity in receipt of preventive services.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17: 458‒464
        • DeVoe JE
        • Fryer GE
        • Phillips R
        • Green L
        Receipt of preventive careamong adults: insurance status and usual source of care.
        Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 786‒791
        • DeVoe JE
        • Tillotson CJ
        • Wallace LS
        • Lesko SE
        • Pandhi N
        Is health insurance enough? A usual source of care may be more important to ensure a child receives preventive health counseling.
        Matern Child Health J. 2012; 16: 306‒315
        • Lambrew JM
        • Defriese GH
        • Carey TS
        • Ricketts TC
        • Biddle AK
        The effects of having a regular doctor on access to primary care.
        Med Care. 1996; 34: 138‒151
        • Liaw W
        • Jetty A
        • Petterson S
        • Bazemore A
        • Green L
        Trends in the types of usual sources of care: a shift from people to places or nothing at all.
        Health Serv Res. 2018; 53: 2346‒2367
        • Liaw W
        • Petterson S
        • Rabin DL
        • Bazemore A
        The impact of insurance and a usual source of care on emergency department use in the United States.
        Int J Fam Med. 2014; 2014842847
      5. HHS. Healthy People 2020. Accessed September 4, 2019.

        • Xue Y
        • Ye Z
        • Brewer C
        • Spetz J
        Impact of state nurse practitioner scope-of-practice regulation on health care delivery: systematic review.
        Nurs Outlook. 2016; 64: 71‒85
        • Mehrotra A
        • Huskamp HA
        • Souza J
        • et al.
        Rapid growth in mental health telemedicine use among rural Medicare beneficiaries, wide variation across states.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2017; 36: 909‒917
        • Mehrotra A
        • Jena AB
        • Busch AB
        • Souza J
        • Uscher-Pines L
        • Landon BE
        Utilization of telemedicine among rural Medicare beneficiaries.
        JAMA. 2016; 315: 2015‒2016
        • Greenberg AJ
        • Haney D
        • Blake KD
        • Moser RP
        • Hesse BW
        Differences in access to and use of electronic personal health information between rural and urban residents in the United States.
        J Rural Health. 2018; 34: s30‒s38