Impact of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Warning Labels on Consumer Behaviors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Published:October 12, 2020DOI:


      As a primary source of added sugars, sugar-sweetened beverage consumption contributes to obesity. This study systematically synthesizes the scientific evidence regarding the impact of sugar-sweetened beverage warning labels on consumer behaviors and intentions.

      Evidence acquisition

      A keyword/reference search was performed in 2019 in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Meta-analysis was conducted in 2020 to estimate the effect of sugar-sweetened beverage warning labels on consumers’ purchase decisions.

      Evidence synthesis

      A total of 23 studies (13 RCTs, 9 nonrandomized experiments, and 1 computer simulation study) met the eligibility criteria and were included. Labels were classified into 6 categories: (1) symbol with nutrient profile, (2) symbol with health effect, (3) text of nutrient profile, (4) text of health effect, (5) graphic with health effect, and (6) graphic with nutrient profile. Compared with the no-label control group, sugar-sweetened beverage warning label use was associated with reduced odds of choosing sugar-sweetened beverages (OR=0.49, 95% CI=0.41, 0.56) and a reduced sugar-sweetened beverage purchase intention (Cohen's d= −0.18, 95% CI= −0.31, −0.06). Across alternative label categories, the graphic with health effect (OR=0.34, 95% CI=0.08, 0.61), text of health effect (OR=0.47, 95% CI=0.39, 0.55), graphic with nutrient profile (OR=0.58, 95% CI=0.36, 0.81), and symbol with health effect (OR=0.67, 95% CI=0.39, 0.95) were associated with reduced odds of choosing sugar-sweetened beverages.


      Sugar-sweetened beverage warning labels were effective in dissuading consumers from choosing them. Graphic with health effect labels showed the largest impact. Future studies should delineate the psychosocial pathways linking sugar-sweetened beverage warning labels to purchase decisions, recruit socioeconomically diverse participants, and design experiments in naturalistic settings.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. 2015–2020 dietary guidelines for Americans 8th edition. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Published 2015. Accessed December 12, 2019.

        • Rosinger A
        • Herrick K
        • Gahche J
        • Park S
        Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among U.S. adults, 2011‒2014.
        NCHS Data Brief. 2017; ( Accessed August 19, 2020): 1-8
        • Rosinger A
        • Herrick K
        • Gahche J
        • Park S
        Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among U.S. youth, 2011‒2014.
        NCHS Data Brief. 2017; ( Accessed August 19, 2020): 1-8
        • Bleich SN
        • Vercammen KA.
        The negative impact of sugar-sweetened beverages on children's health: an update of the literature.
        BMC Obes. 2018; 5: 6
        • Hu FB
        • Malik VS.
        Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes: epidemiologic evidence.
        Physiol Behav. 2010; 100: 47-54
        • Malik VS
        • Popkin BM
        • Bray GA
        • Després JP
        • Hu FB
        Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk.
        Circulation. 2010; 121: 1356-1364
      2. WHO. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children.;jsessionid=B2DBEBDB0A19B3A00515EDE9A20146E5?sequence=1. Published March 2015. Accessed December 12, 2019.

        • Hammond D.
        Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review.
        Tob Control. 2011; 20: 327-337
        • Noar SM
        • Francis DB
        • Bridges C
        • Sontag JM
        • Ribisl KM
        • Brewer NT
        The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: systematic review of longitudinal observational studies.
        Soc Sci Med. 2016; 164: 118-129
      3. American Heart Association. Warning labels on sugary drinks: AHA policy position and issue messaging. Published 2017. Accessed December 12, 2019.

      4. SB-1000 Public health: sugar-sweetened beverages: safety warnings. California Legislative Information. Published February 13, 2014. Accessed December 12, 2019.

        • Falbe J
        • Madsen K.
        Growing momentum for sugar-sweetened beverage campaigns and policies: costs and considerations.
        Am J Public Health. 2017; 107: 835-838
      5. SB347 Sugar-sweetened beverages: safety warnings. California Legislative Information. Published June 12, 2019. Accessed December 12, 2019.

      6. HB 2798-2015-16 Concerning mitigation of the adverse impacts of sugar-sweetened beverages. Washington State Legislature. Published March 10, 2016. Accessed December 12, 2019.

      7. HB1209 Relating to health. Hawaii State Legislature. Published January 30, 2017. Accessed December 12, 2019.

      8. H.433 An act relating to health and safety warnings on sugar-sweetened beverages. Vermont General Assembly. Published February 23, 2017. Accessed December 12, 2019.

      9. Senate Bill S162. The New York State Senate. Published January 4, 2017. Accessed December 12, 2019.

      10. Legislation introduced at roll call. City of San Francisco. Published 2015. Accessed December 12, 2019.

      11. Gonzales R. Federal appeals court blocks San Francisco law on ad warnings for sugary drinks. Washington, DC: National Public Radio. Published January 31, 2019. Accessed December 12, 2019.

      12. Smith E. Chile battles obesity with stop signs on packaged foods. Washington, DC: National Public Radio. Published August 12, 2016. Accessed December 12, 2019.

        • Taillie LS
        • Reyes M
        • Colchero MA
        • Popkin B
        • Corvalán C
        An evaluation of Chile's Law of Food Labeling and Advertising on sugar-sweetened beverage purchases from 2015 to 2017: a before-and-after study.
        PLoS Med. 2020; 17e1003015
        • Reyes M
        • Garmendia ML
        • Olivares S
        • Aqueveque C
        • Zacarías I
        • Corvalán C
        Development of the Chilean front-of-package food warning label.
        BMC Public Health. 2019; 19: 906
        • Sherman A
        Mexico votes to strengthen food and beverage warning labels.
        William Reed, Crawley, United KingdomPublished October 28, 2019 (Accessed December 12, 2019)
        • Popova L
        Sugar-sweetened beverage warning labels: lessons learned from the tobacco industry.
        J Calif Dent Assoc. 2016; 44 ( Accessed August 19, 2020): 633-640
      13. Mukkamala B.Strategies to reduce the consumption of beverages with added sweeteners. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association. Published 2017. Accessed December 12, 2019.

        • Moher D
        • Liberati A
        • Tetzlaff J
        • Altman DG
        • PRISMA Group
        Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
        PLoS Med. 2009; 6e1000097
        • Acton RB
        • Jones AC
        • Kirkpatrick SI
        • Roberto CA
        • Hammond D
        Taxes and front-of-package labels improve the healthiness of beverage and snack purchases: a randomized experimental marketplace.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019; 16: 46
        • Grummon AH
        • Hall MG
        • Taillie LS
        • Brewer NT
        How should sugar-sweetened beverage health warnings be designed? A randomized experiment.
        Prev Med. 2019; 121: 158-166
        • Acton RB
        • Hammond D.
        Do consumers think front-of-package “high in” warnings are harsh or reduce their control? A test of food industry concerns.
        Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018; 26: 1687-1691
        • Bollard T
        • Maubach N
        • Walker N
        • Ni Mhurchu C
        Effects of plain packaging, warning labels, and taxes on young people's predicted sugar-sweetened beverage preferences: an experimental study.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016; 13: 95
        • Roberto CA
        • Bragg MA
        • Schwartz MB
        • et al.
        Facts up front versus traffic light food labels: a randomized controlled trial.
        Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43: 134-141
        • Bergen D
        • Yeh MC.
        Effects of energy-content labels and motivational posters on sales of sugar-sweetened beverages: stimulating sales of diet drinks among adults study.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106: 1866-1869
        • Lima M
        • de Alcantara M
        • Ares G
        • Deliza R
        It is not all about information! Sensory experience overrides the impact of nutrition information on consumers’ choice of sugar-reduced drinks.
        Food Quality and Preference. 2019; 74: 1-9
        • Bleich SN
        • Barry CL
        • Gary-Webb TL
        • Herring BJ
        Reducing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption by providing caloric information: how black adolescents alter their purchases and whether the effects persist.
        Am J Public Health. 2014; 104: 2417-2424
        • Thorndike AN
        • Sonnenberg L
        • Riis J
        • Barraclough S
        • Levy DE
        A 2-phase labeling and choice architecture intervention to improve healthy food and beverage choices.
        Am J Public Health. 2012; 102: 527-533
        • Gray JP
        • Karnon J
        • Blackwell L
        Sugar consumption from beverages and the potential effects of a text-based information label.
        Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011; 35: 88-89
        • Arrúa A
        • Curutchet MR
        • Rey N
        • et al.
        Impact of front-of-pack nutrition information and label design on children's choice of two snack foods: comparison of warnings and the traffic-light system.
        Appetite. 2017; 116: 139-146
        • Lee BY
        • Ferguson MC
        • Hertenstein DL
        • et al.
        Simulating the impact of sugar-sweetened beverage warning labels in three cities.
        Am J Prev Med. 2018; 54: 197-204
        • Ni Mhurchu C
        • Volkova E
        • Jiang Y
        • et al.
        Effects of interpretive nutrition labels on consumer food purchases: the Starlight randomized controlled trial.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2017; 105: 695-704
        • Kocken PL
        • Eeuwijk J
        • Van Kesteren NM
        • et al.
        Promoting the purchase of low-calorie foods from school vending machines: a cluster-randomized controlled study.
        J Sch Health. 2012; 82: 115-122
        • Donnelly GE
        • Zatz LY
        • Svirsky D
        • John LK
        The effect of graphic warnings on sugary-drink purchasing.
        Psychol Sci. 2018; 29: 1321-1333
        • Higgins JP
        • Thompson SG
        • Deeks JJ
        • Altman DG
        Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.
        BMJ. 2003; 327: 557-560
        • Lin L
        • Chu H.
        Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis.
        Biometrics. 2018; 74: 785-794
        • An R
        • Wang J
        • Ashrafi SA
        • Yang Y
        • Guan C
        Chronic noise exposure and adiposity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Prev Med. 2018; 55: 403-411
        • Acton RB
        • Hammond D.
        The impact of price and nutrition labelling on sugary drink purchases: results from an experimental marketplace study.
        Appetite. 2018; 121: 129-137
        • Billich N
        • Blake MR
        • Backholer K
        • Cobcroft M
        • Li V
        • Peeters A
        The effect of sugar-sweetened beverage front-of-pack labels on drink selection, health knowledge and awareness: an online randomised controlled trial.
        Appetite. 2018; 128 (233‒241)
        • Franckle RL
        • Levy DE
        • Macias-Navarro L
        • Rimm EB
        • Thorndike AN
        Traffic-light labels and financial incentives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage purchases by low-income Latino families: a randomized controlled trial.
        Public Health Nutr. 2018; 21: 1426-1434
        • Mantzari E
        • Vasiljevic M
        • Turney I
        • Pilling M
        • Marteau T
        Impact of warning labels on sugar-sweetened beverages on parental selection: an online experimental study.
        Prev Med Rep. 2018; 12: 259-267
        • Moran AJ
        • Roberto CA
        Health warning labels correct parents’ misperceptions about sugary drink options.
        Am J Prev Med. 2018; 55: e19-e27
        • VanEpps EM
        • Roberto CA.
        The influence of sugar-sweetened beverage warnings: a randomized trial of adolescents’ choices and beliefs.
        Am J Prev Med. 2016; 51: 664-672
        • Effertz T
        • Franke MK
        • Teichert T
        Adolescents’ assessments of advertisements for unhealthy food: an example of warning labels for soft drinks.
        J Consum Policy. 2014; 37: 279-299
        • Roberto CA
        • Wong D
        • Musicus A
        • Hammond D
        The influence of sugar-sweetened beverage health warning labels on parents’ choices.
        Pediatrics. 2016; 137e20153185
        • Hammond D
        • Fong GT
        • McDonald PW
        • Brown KS
        • Cameron R
        Graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels and adverse outcomes: evidence from Canadian smokers.
        Am J Public Health. 2004; 94: 1442-1445
        • Wogalter MS
        • Conzola VC
        • Smith-Jackson TL
        Research-based guidelines for warning design and evaluation.
        Appl Ergon. 2002; 33: 219-230
        • Hammond D
        • Fong GT
        • Borland R
        • Cummings KM
        • McNeill A
        • Driezen P
        Text and graphic warnings on cigarette packages: findings from the international tobacco control four country study.
        Am J Prev Med. 2007; 32: 202-209
        • Magnan RE
        • Cameron LD.
        Do young adults perceive that cigarette graphic warnings provide new knowledge about the harms of smoking?.
        Ann Behav Med. 2015; 49: 594-604
        • Hall MG
        • Sheeran P
        • Noar SM
        • et al.
        Negative affect, message reactance and perceived risk: how do pictorial cigarette pack warnings change quit intentions?.
        Tob Control. 2018; 27: e136-e142
        • Kim AE
        • Nonnemaker JM
        • Loomis BR
        • et al.
        Influence of point-of-sale tobacco displays and graphic health warning signs on adults: evidence from a virtual store experimental study.
        Am J Public Health. 2014; 104: 888-895
        • Grummon AH
        • Taillie LS
        • Golden SD
        • Hall MG
        • Ranney LM
        • Brewer NT
        Sugar-sweetened beverage health warnings and purchases: a randomized controlled trial.
        Am J Prev Med. 2019; 57: 601-610