Introduction
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive MedicineREFERENCES
- Abortion surveillance - United States, 2016.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019; 68: 1-41https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6811a1
- Induced abortion in the United States.Guttmacher Institute, New York, NYPublished September 2019https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-united-statesDate accessed: August 23, 2020
- Clinical practice handbook for safe abortion.WHO, Geneva, Switzerland2014https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/unsafe_abortion/clinical-practice-safe-abortion/en/Date accessed: May 3, 2020
Little B. The science behind the “abortion pill.” Smithsonian Magazine.https://www.smithsonianmag.com/health-medicine/science-behind-abortion-pill-180963762/. Published June 23, 2017. Accessed May 3, 2020.
- Association of facility type with procedural-related morbidities and adverse events among patients undergoing induced abortions.JAMA. 2018; 319: 2497-2506https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.7675
- Self-managed medication abortion: expanding the available options for U.S. abortion care.Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2018; 21: 41-47
Medication abortion. Guttmacher Institute.https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/medication-abortion. Updated January 1, 2021. Accessed 25 October 2020.
- The availability and use of medication abortion.Kaiser Family Foundation, San Franscisco, CAPublished June 8, 2020https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/fact-sheet/the-availability-and-use-of-medication-abortion/Date accessed: October 25, 2020
Jones RK, Boonstra H. The public health implications of the FDA's update to the medication abortion label. Health Affairs Blog.https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20160630.055639/full/. Published June 30, 2016. Accessed August 16, 2020.
- Differences in abortion service delivery in hostile, middle-ground, and supportive states in 2014.Womens Health Issues. 2018; 28: 212-218https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2017.12.003
- Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011.N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 843-852https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1506575
- Unintended pregnancy in the United States.Guttmacher Institute, New York, NYPublished January 2019https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/unintended-pregnancy-united-statesDate accessed: August 3, 2020
- Variation in state unintended pregnancy rates in the United States.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 44: 57-64https://doi.org/10.1363/4405712
- Unintended pregnancy rates at the state level: estimates for 2010 and trends since 2002.Guttmacher Institute, New York, NYPublished January 2015https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/stateup10.pdfDate accessed: August 23, 2020
- Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000-2001.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002; 34: 294-303https://doi.org/10.2307/3097748
- Public costs from unintended pregnancies and the role of public insurance programs in paying for pregnancy-related care: national and state estimates for 2010.Guttmacher Institute, New York, NYPublished February 2015https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/public-costs-of-up-2010.pdfDate accessed: August 23, 2020
- The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States.Contraception. 2007; 75: 168-170https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2006.11.009
- The importance of access to comprehensive reproductive health care, including abortion: a statement from women's health professional organizations.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220: 67-70https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.008
2020 Topics and objectives: family planning. HealthyPeople.gov, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, HHS. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/family-planning. Updated October 8, 2020. Accessed 3 May 2020.
- The over-medicalization and corrupted medicalization of abortion and its effect on women living in poverty.J Law Med Ethics. 2018; 46: 672-679https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110518804222
- Policy surveillance: a vital public health practice comes of age.J Health Polit Policy Law. 2016; 41: 1151-1173https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-3665931
- The promise (and pitfalls) of public health policy surveillance.J Health Polit Policy Law. 2016; 41: 1175-1183https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-3665976
Medication abortion requirements. The Policy Surveillance Program, A LawAtlas Project. http://lawatlas.org/datasets/medication-abortion-requirements. Updated August 31, 2020. Accessed 17 August, 2019.
State partisan composition. National Conference of State Legislatures.http://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/partisan-composition.aspx. Updated September 8, 2020. Accessed 3 May 2020.
- Abortion access in the United States, 2017.Updated September 11, 2019 (Guttmacher Institute)
Maps: population density for counties and Puerto Rico Municipios: July 11, 2011. U.S. Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/history/www/reference/maps/. Updated December 17, 2020. Accessed 3 May 2020.
Map: poverty in the United States. U.S. Census Bureau.https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/2016/comm/cb16-158_poverty_map.html. Updated September 15, 2016. Accessed May 13, 2020
Population distribution by race/ethnicity. Kaiser Family Foundation.https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/distribution-by-raceethnicity/?activeTab=map¤tTimeframe=0&selectedDistributions=white&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D. Updated October 28, 2020. Accessed 3 May 2020.
Teen birth rate by state. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/teen-births/teenbirths.htm. Updated April 28, 2020. Accessed 3 May 202.
- The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119: 215-219https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823fe923
Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California San Francisco. Abortion restrictions put women's health, safety and well-being at risk. San Francisco, CA: Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California San Francisco.https://bixbycenter.ucsf.edu/sites/bixbycenter.ucsf.edu/files/Abortion%20restrictions%20risk%20women%27s%20health.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2020.
- Genetic counselors’ perception of the effect on practice of laws restricting abortion.J Genet Couns. 2017; 26: 1059-1069https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0083-x
Sex and HIV education. Guttmacher Institute.https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/sex-and-hiv-education. Updated January 1, 2021. Accessed October 29, 2020.
Insurance coverage of contraceptives. Guttmacher Institute.https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/insurance-coverage-contraceptives. Updated January 1, 2021. Accessed 29 October 2020.
- Medication abortion and telemedicine: innovations and barriers during the COVID-19 emergency.Kaiser Family Foundation, San Francisco, CAPublished June 8, 2020https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/medication-abortion-telemedicine-innovations-and-barriers-during-the-covid-19-emergency/Date accessed: October 29, 2020
