Advertisement

Permanent Supportive Housing With Housing First: Findings From a Community Guide Systematic Economic Review

Published:November 10, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2021.08.009

      Introduction

      The annual economic burden of chronic homelessness in the U.S. is estimated to be as high as $3.4 billion. The Permanent Supportive Housing with Housing First (Housing First) program, implemented to address the problem, has been shown to be effective. This paper examines the economic cost and benefit of Housing First Programs.

      Methods

      The search of peer-reviewed and gray literature from inception of databases through November 2019 yielded 20 evaluation studies of Housing First Programs, 17 from the U.S. and 3 from Canada. All analyses were conducted from March 2019 through July 2020. Monetary values are reported in 2019 U.S. dollars.

      Results

      Evidence from studies conducted in the U.S. was separated from those conducted in Canada. The median intervention cost per person per year for U.S. studies was $16,479, and for all studies, including those from Canada, it was $16,336. The median total benefit for the U.S. studies was $18,247 per person per year, and it was $17,751 for all studies, including those from Canada. The benefit-to-cost ratio for U.S. studies was 1.80:1, and for all studies, including those from Canada, it was 1.06:1.

      Discussion

      The evidence from this review shows that economic benefits exceed the cost of Housing First Programs in the U.S. There were too few studies to determine cost–benefit in the Canadian context.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

      1. Homeless emergency assistance and rapid transition to housing: defining “chronically homeless”.
        Fed Regist. 2015; 80 (To be coded at 80 FR 75791.): 75791-75806
        • Institute of Medicine (U.S.), Committee on Health Care for Homeless People
        Homelessness, Health, and Human Needs.
        National Academies Press (U.S.), Washington, DC1988
        • Chamberlain C
        • Johnson G.
        Pathways into adult homelessness.
        J Sociol (Melb). 2011; 49: 60-77https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783311422458
        • Thompson Jr, RG
        • Wall MM
        • Greenstein E
        • Grant BF
        • Hasin DS.
        Substance-use disorders and poverty as prospective predictors of first-time homelessness in the United States.
        Am J Public Health. 2013; 103: S282-S288https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301302
        • van Laere IR
        • de Wit MA
        • Klazinga NS.
        Pathways into homelessness: recently homeless adults problems and service use before and after becoming homeless in Amsterdam.
        BMC Public Health. 2009; 9: 3https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-3
        • Montgomery AE
        • Cutuli JJ
        • Evans-Chase M
        • Treglia D
        • Culhane DP.
        Relationship among adverse childhood experiences, history of active military service, and adult outcomes: homelessness, mental health, and physical health.
        Am J Public Health. 2013; 103: S262-S268https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301474
        • Roos LE
        • Mota N
        • Afifi TO
        • Katz LY
        • Distasio J
        • Sareen J.
        Relationship between adverse childhood experiences and homelessness and the impact of axis I and II disorders.
        Am J Public Health. 2013; 103: S275-S281https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301323
        • Brown RT
        • Goodman L
        • Guzman D
        • Tieu L
        • Ponath C
        • Kushel MB.
        Pathways to homelessness among older homeless adults: results from the HOPE HOME Study.
        PLoS One. 2016; 11e0155065https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155065
        • Piat M
        • Polvere L
        • Kirst M
        • et al.
        Pathways into homelessness: understanding how both individual and structural factors contribute to and sustain homelessness in Canada.
        Urban Stud. 2015; 52 (2014?): 2366-2382https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014548138
        • Tsai J.
        Lifetime and 1-year prevalence of homelessness in the U.S. population: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on alcohol and Related Conditions-III [published correction appears in J Public Health (Oxf). 2017;39(4):879–880].
        J Public Health (Oxf). 2018; 40: 65-74https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx034
        • Tsai J
        • Rosenheck RA.
        Risk factors for homelessness among U.S. veterans.
        Epidemiol Rev. 2015; 37: 177-195https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxu004
        • Fazel S
        • Geddes JR
        • Kushel M.
        The health of homeless people in high-income countries: descriptive epidemiology, health consequences, and clinical and policy recommendations.
        Lancet. 2014; 384: 1529-1540https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61132-6
        • Johnson G
        • Chamberlain C.
        Homelessness and substance abuse: which comes first?.
        Aust Soc Work. 2008; 61: 342-356https://doi.org/10.1080/03124070802428191
        • Lebrun-Harris LA
        • Baggett TP
        • Jenkins DM
        • et al.
        Health status and health care experiences among homeless patients in federally supported health centers: findings from the 2009 patient survey.
        Health Serv Res. 2013; 48: 992-1017https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12009
        • Lewer D
        • Aldridge RW
        • Menezes D
        • et al.
        Health-related quality of life and prevalence of six chronic diseases in homeless and housed people: a cross-sectional study in London and Birmingham, England.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9e025192https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025192
        • Martens WH.
        A review of physical and mental health in homeless persons.
        Public Health Rev. 2001; 29: 13-33
        • Caton CL
        • Dominguez B
        • Schanzer B
        • et al.
        Risk factors for long-term homelessness: findings from a longitudinal study of first-time homeless single adults.
        Am J Public Health. 2005; 95: 1753-1759https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.063321
        • Caton CL
        • Wilkins C
        • Anderson J.
        People who experience long-term homelessness: characteristics and interventions.
        Toward Understanding Homelessness: The 2007 National Symposium on Homelessness Research. HHS, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC2007
        • Culhane DP.
        The cost of homelessness: a perspective from the United States.
        Eur J Homelessness. 2008; 2 (https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1156&context=spp_papers.Accessed May 6, 2021.): 97-114
        • Fuehrlein BS
        • Cowell AJ
        • Pollio DE
        • Cupps LY
        • Balfour ME
        • North CS.
        Deriving costs of service use among an urban homeless population.
        J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014; 46: 491-497https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2013.12.002
        • Latimer EA
        • Rabouin D
        • Cao Z
        • et al.
        Costs of services for homeless people with mental illness in 5 Canadian cities: a large prospective follow-up study.
        CMAJ Open. 2017; 5: E576-E585https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20170018
        • Parsell C
        • Petersen M
        • Culhane D.
        Cost offsets of supportive housing: evidence for social work.
        Br J Soc Work. 2017; 47: 1534-1553https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw115
        • Poulin SR
        • Maguire M
        • Metraux S
        • Culhane DP.
        Service use and costs for persons experiencing chronic homelessness in Philadelphia: a population-based study.
        Psychiatr Serv. 2010; 61: 1093-1098https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2010.61.11.1093
        • Wu F
        • Stevens M.
        The services homeless single adults use and their associated costs: An examination of utilization patterns and expenditures in Los Angeles County over one fiscal year.
        Homeless Initiative Program, Indianapolis, INJanuary 2016 (Published)
        • Henry M
        • Watt R
        • Mahathey A
        • Ouellette J
        • Sitler A.
        The 2019 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress. Part 1: point-in-time estimates of homelessness.
        The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DCJanuary 2020 (Published)
        • National Alliance to End Homelessness
        Ending chronic homelessness saves taxpayers money.
        National Alliance to End Homelessness, Washington, DCJune 2017 (Published)
        • The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
        Housing first in permanent supportive housing.
        The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC2014 (Published)
        • Tsemberis S
        • Gulcur L
        • Nakae M.
        Housing first, consumer choice, and harm reduction for homeless individuals with a dual diagnosis.
        Am J Public Health. 2004; 94: 651-656https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.4.651
        • About the Community Preventive Services Task Force
        The Guide to Community Preventive Services.
        July 28, 2021 (Updated)
      2. Health Equity: permanent supportive housing with housing first (Housing First Programs): snapshot.
        The Guide to Community Preventive Services, January 26, 2021 (Updated)
        • Peng Y
        • Hahn RA
        • Finnie RKC
        • et al.
        Permanent supportive housing with housing first to reduce homelessness and promote health among homeless populations with disability: a Community Guide Systematic Review.
        J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020; 26: 404-411https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001219
        • Aubry T
        • Bloch G
        • Brcic V
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of permanent supportive housing and income assistance interventions for homeless individuals in high-income countries: a systematic review.
        Lancet Public Health. 2020; 5: e342-e360https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30055-4
        • Eichler HG
        • Kong SX
        • Gerth WC
        • Mavros P
        • Jönsson B.
        Use of cost-effectiveness analysis in health-care resource allocation decision-making: how are cost-effectiveness thresholds expected to emerge?.
        Value Health. 2004; 7: 518-528https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.75003.x
        • WHO
        Macroeconomics and health: investing in health for economic development: report of the commission on macroeconomics and health.
        WHO, Geneva, SwitzerlandDecember 20, 2001 (Published)
      3. Methods manual - part 2: economic review process.
        The Guide to Community Preventive Services, September 2, 2021 (Updated)
        • The Community Guide staff
        The Guide to Community Preventive Services.
        April 14, 2021 (Updated)
      4. World Bank country and lending groups. The World Bank.https://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups. Accessed September 16, 2021.

      5. Health equity: permanent supportive housing with housing first (Housing First Programs): supporting materials: search strategies – economic review.
        The Guide to Community Preventive Services, January 26, 2021 (Updated)
      6. Databases, tables & calculators by subject: CPI for all urban consumers (CPI-U). Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUUR0000SA0?output_view=pct_1mth. Accessed September 16, 2021.

      7. PPP conversion factor, private consumption (LCU per international $). The World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/PA.NUS.PRVT.PP. Accessed September 16, 2021.

        • Basu A
        • Kee R
        • Buchanan D
        • Sadowski LS.
        Comparative cost analysis of housing and case management program for chronically ill homeless adults compared to usual care.
        Health Serv Res. 2012; 47: 523-543https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01350.x
        • Byrne T
        • Roberts CB
        • Culhane DP
        • Kane V.
        Estimating cost savings associated with HUD-VASH placement.
        VA National Center on Homelessness among Veterans, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Philadelphia, PAApril 2014 (Published)
        • Culhane DP
        • Metraux S
        • Hadley TR.
        Public service reductions associated with placement of homeless persons with severe mental illness in supportive housing.
        Hous Policy Debate. 2002; 13: 107-163https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2002.9521437
        • Flaming D
        • Lee S
        • Burns P
        • Sumner G.
        Getting home: outcomes from housing high cost homeless hospital patients.
        SSRN, Rochester, NYMay 2, 2016 (Published)
        • Gilmer TP.
        Permanent supportive housing for transition-age youths: service costs and fidelity to the housing first model.
        Psychiatr Serv. 2016; 67: 615-621https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201500200
        • Gilmer TP
        • Manning WG
        • Ettner SL.
        A cost analysis of San Diego County's REACH program for homeless persons.
        Psychiatr Serv. 2009; 60: 445-450https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.60.4.445
        • Gilmer TP
        • Stefancic A
        • Ettner SL
        • Manning WG
        • Tsemberis S.
        Effect of full-service partnerships on homelessness, use and costs of mental health services, and quality of life among adults with serious mental illness.
        Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010; 67: 645-652https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.56
        • Gilmer TP
        • Stefancic A
        • Tsemberis S
        • Ettner SL.
        Full-service partnerships among adults with serious mental illness in California: impact on utilization and costs.
        Psychiatr Serv. 2014; 65: 1120-1125https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201300380
        • Holtgrave DR
        • Wolitski RJ
        • Pals SL
        • et al.
        Cost-utility analysis of the housing and health intervention for homeless and unstably housed persons living with HIV.
        AIDS Behav. 2013; 17: 1626-1631https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0204-3
        • Larimer ME
        • Malone DK
        • Garner MD
        • et al.
        Health care and public service use and costs before and after provision of housing for chronically homeless persons with severe alcohol problems.
        JAMA. 2009; 301: 1349-1357https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.414
        • Levanon Seligson A
        • Lim S
        • Singh T
        • et al.
        New York/New York III supportive housing evaluation: interim utilization and cost analysis.
        New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City Human Resources Administration, the New York State Office of Mental Health, New York City, NY2013 (Published)
        • Lim S
        • Gao Q
        • Stazesky E
        • Singh TP
        • Harris TG
        Levanon Seligson A. Impact of a New York City supportive housing program on Medicaid expenditure patterns among people with serious mental illness and chronic homelessness.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18: 15https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2816-9
        • Rosenheck R
        • Kasprow W
        • Frisman L
        • Liu-Mares W.
        Cost-effectiveness of supported housing for homeless persons with mental illness.
        Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003; 60: 940-951https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.940
        • Flaming D
        • Burns P
        • Matsunaga M.
        Where we sleep. Costs when homeless and housed in Los Angeles.
        SSRN, Rochester, NYMay 2, 2016
        • Schinka JA
        • Francis E
        • Hughes P
        • LaLone L
        • Flynn C.
        Comparative outcomes and costs of inpatient care and supportive housing for substance-dependent veterans.
        Psychiatr Serv. 1998; 49: 946-950https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.49.7.946
        • Srebnik D
        • Connor T
        • Sylla L.
        A pilot study of the impact of housing first-supported housing for intensive users of medical hospitalization and sobering services.
        Am J Public Health. 2013; 103: 316-321https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300867
        • Toros H
        • Stevens M
        • Project Moreno M.
        50: the cost effectiveness of the permanent supportive housing model in the skid row section of Los Angeles County.
        County of Los Angeles, Chief Executive Office, Service Integration Branch, Los Angeles, CAJune 2012 (Published)
        • Goering P
        • Veldhuizen S
        • Watson A
        • et al.
        National final report. Cross-Site at Home/Chez Soi project.
        Mental Health Commission of Canada, Calgary, AB2014 (Published)
        • Latimer EA
        • Rabouin D
        • Cao Z
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness of housing first intervention with intensive case management compared with treatment as usual for homeless adults with mental illness: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial [published correction appears in JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(9):e1912622].
        JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2e199782https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9782
        • Patterson M
        • Somers J
        • McIntosh K
        • Shiell A
        • Frankish CJ.
        Housing and support for adults with severe addictions and/or mental illness in BC.
        Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health & Addiction, Simon Fraser University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaOctober 31, 2007 (Published)
        • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
        Permanent Supportive Housing: Evaluating the Evidence for Improving Health Outcomes Among People Experiencing Chronic Homelessness.
        The National Academies Press, Washington, DC2018https://doi.org/10.17226/25133
        • Latimer EA
        • Rabouin D
        • Cao Z
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness of housing first with assertive community treatment: results from the Canadian At Home/Chez Soi Trial.
        Psychiatr Serv. 2020; 71: 1020-1030https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202000029
        • Fernandes A.
        Health at a Glance 2019.
        OECD Publishing, Paris, France2019
        • Cutler DM
        • Ly DP.
        The (paper) work of medicine: understanding international medical costs.
        J Econ Perspect. 2011; 25: 3-25https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.2.3
        • Pozen A
        • Cutler DM.
        Medical spending differences in the United States and Canada: the role of prices, procedures, and administrative expenses.
        Inquiry. 2010; 47: 124-134https://doi.org/10.5034/inquiryjrnl_47.02.124
        • Eberle MP.
        Homelessness – causes & effects: the costs of homelessness in British Columbia.
        British Columbia Ministry of Social Development & Economic Security, BC Housing Management Commission, Burnaby, British Columbia, CanadaFebruary 2001 (Published)
      8. Social expenditures database (SOCX). OECD. https://www.oecd.org/social/expenditure.htm#::text=The%20OECD%20Social%20Expenditure%20Database,as%20net%20social%20spending%20indicators. Accessed August 1, 2021.

        • Moffitt RA.
        The deserving poor, the family, and the U.S. welfare system.
        Demography. 2015; 52: 729-749https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0395-0
        • Moffitt RA
        • Pauley G.
        Trends in the Distribution of Social Safety Net Support After the Great Recession.
        Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality, Palo Alto, CA2018