- Malik VS
- Hu FB.
- Kit BK
- Fakhouri TH
- Park S
- Nielsen SJ
- Ogden CL.
- Bleich SN
- Wolfson JA.U.
- Han E
- Powell LM.
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Sugar-sweetened beverages and cardiometabolic health: an update of the evidence.Nutrients. 2019; 11: 1840https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11081840
- Trends in sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among youth and adults in the United States: 1999-2010.Am J Clin Nutr. 2013; 98: 180-188https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.057943
- S. adults and child snacking patterns among sugar-sweetened beverage drinkers and non-drinkers.Prev Med. 2015; 72: 8-14https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.01.003
- Consumption patterns of sugar-sweetened beverages in the United States.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013; 113: 43-53https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2012.09.016
- Soft drink “pouring rights”: marketing empty calories to children.Public Health Rep. 2000; 115: 308-319https://doi.org/10.1093/phr/115.4.308
- Sugar-sweetened beverage reduction policies: progress and promise.Annu Rev Public Health. 2021; 42: 439-461https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-103005
- Sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: the potential for cardiovascular health.Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2018; 12: 28https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-018-0593-6
- Corporate practices and health: a framework and mechanisms.Global Health. 2018; 14: 21https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0336-y
- Power dynamics in 21st-century food systems.Nutrients. 2019; 11: 2544https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11102544
Almeling DS. The problems of pouring-rights contracts. Duke Law J. 2003;53(3):1111‒1135. Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol53/iss3/4. Accessed October 3, 2021.
OECD. Education at a glance: educational finance (edition 2018). Paris, France: OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/data/500dc1b1-en. Published 2018. Accessed December 15, 2021.
MuckRock. https://www.muckrock.com/. Accessed January 11, 2021.
- MAXQDA [computer software.VERBI Software], Berlin, Germany2019
- Can U.S. local soda taxes continue to spread?.Food Policy. 2017; 71: 1-7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.05.007
- Not so sweet refrain: sugar-sweetened beverage taxes, industry opposition and harnessing the lessons learned from tobacco control legal challenges.Health Econ Policy Law. 2019; 14: 509-535https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744133118000178
- Public meets private: conversations between Coca-Cola and the CDC.Milbank Q. 2019; 97: 74-90https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12368
- How food companies influence evidence and opinion–straight from the horse's mouth.Crit Public Health. 2018; 28: 253-256https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2017.1371844
- Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health.University of California Press, Berkeley, CA2013 (Vol 3)
- Soft drink availability, contracts, and revenues in American secondary schools.Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33 (suppl): S209-S225https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.006
- Commercialism in U.S. elementary and secondary school nutrition environments: trends from 2007 to 2012.JAMA Pediatr. 2014; 168: 234-242https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4521