Advertisement

The Impact of Cannabis Packaging Characteristics on Perceptions and Intentions

      Introduction

      As cannabis increasingly becomes a consumer product in the U.S., its product packaging has become critically important to regulators. This study examined the influence of recreational cannabis packaging characteristics.

      Methods

      Five online between-subjects experiments were conducted in April 2021, and data were analyzed in May 2021–July 2021. Experiments randomized participants to view different (1) types of cannabis, (2) visual displays of tetrahydrocannabinol content, (3) cannabis packages designed around brand personality research, (4) health warnings, and (5) health claims. Outcomes included cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses.

      Results

      A total of 841 adults from the U.S. (49% male, 50% young adults, 44% White, 17% Hispanic) were included in the study. Edible gummies were perceived as healthier (β=0.32, 95% CI=0.03, 0.62), less grown up (β= −0.58, 95% CI= −0.86, −0.28), and more socially acceptable to consume (β=0.30, 95% CI=0.01, 0.59) than cannabis concentrate in a medical dropper. Participants also had more interest in trying edible gummies (β=1.33, 95% CI=1.04, 1.62) and trying a free sample (β=1.30, 95% CI=1.01, 1.60) than trying cannabis concentrate. Cannabis packages with a helps-you-relax health claim elicited more happy (β=0.34, 95% CI=0.04, 0.64) and good (β=0.37, 95% CI=0.07, 0.67) feelings than cannabis packages without this claim. Minimal effects were found for visual displays of tetrahydrocannabinol content and health warnings.

      Conclusions

      Edibles are a unique type of cannabis that should be given special consideration under state laws, and lawmakers should consider limiting and governing the use of both implicit and explicit health claims on recreational cannabis packages when implementing laws.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Cerdá M
        • Mauro C
        • Hamilton A
        • et al.
        Association between recreational marijuana legalization in the United States and changes in marijuana use and cannabis use disorder from 2008 to 2016.
        JAMA Psychiatry. 2020; 77: 165-171https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3254
        • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
        Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: results from the 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. PEP20-07-01-001, NSDUH Series H-55).
        Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD2020
        • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
        The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: the Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research.
        National Academies Press, Washington, DC2017
        • Hasin DS
        • Saha TD
        • Kerridge BT
        • et al.
        Prevalence of marijuana use disorders in the United States between 2001–2002 and 2012–2013.
        JAMA Psychiatry. 2015; 72: 1235-1242https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1858
        • Compton WM
        • Han B
        • Jones CM
        • Blanco C.
        Cannabis use disorders among adults in the United States during a time of increasing use of cannabis.
        Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019; 204107468https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.05.008
        • Winters KC
        • Lee CY.
        Likelihood of developing an alcohol and cannabis use disorder during youth: association with recent use and age.
        Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008; 92: 239-247https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.08.005
        • Meier MH
        • Caspi A
        • Ambler A
        • et al.
        Persistent cannabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109: E2657-E2664https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206820109
        • Jouanjus E
        • Leymarie F
        • Tubery M
        • Lapeyre-Mestre M.
        Cannabis-related hospitalizations: unexpected serious events identified through hospital databases.
        Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011; 71: 758-765https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03897.x
        • Whitehill JM
        • Dilley JA
        • Brooks-Russell A
        • Terpak L
        • Graves JM.
        Edible cannabis exposures among children: 2017–2019.
        Pediatrics. 2021; 147e2020019893https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-019893
        • Gourdet C
        • Giombi KC
        • Kosa K
        • Wiley J
        • Cates S.
        How four U.S. states are regulating recreational marijuana edibles.
        Int J Drug Policy. 2017; 43: 83-90https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.01.018
        • Barry RA
        • Glantz SA.
        Marijuana regulatory frameworks in four U.S. States: an analysis against a public health standard.
        Am J Public Health. 2018; 108: 914-923https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304401
        • Hammond D.
        Communicating THC levels and ‘dose’ to consumers: implications for product labelling and packaging of cannabis products in regulated markets.
        Int J Drug Policy. 2021; 91102509https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.07.004
        • Hammond D.
        Plain packaging” regulations for tobacco products: the impact of standardizing the color and design of cigarette packs.
        Salud Publica Mex. 2010; 52: S226-S232https://doi.org/10.1590/s0036-36342010000800018
        • Lempert LK
        • Glantz S.
        Packaging colour research by tobacco companies: the pack as a product characteristic.
        Tob Control. 2017; 26: 307-315https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052656
        • Kotnowski K
        • Hammond D.
        The impact of cigarette pack shape, size and opening: evidence from tobacco company documents.
        Addiction. 2013; 108: 1658-1668https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12183
        • Gendall P
        • Hoek J
        • Thomson G
        • et al.
        Young adults’ interpretations of tobacco brands: implications for tobacco control.
        Nicotine Tob Res. 2011; 13: 911-918https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntr094
        • Wakefield M
        • Morley C
        • Horan JK
        • Cummings KM.
        The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents.
        Tob Control. 2002; 11: I73-I80https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i73
        • Huang LL
        • Baker HM
        • Meernik C
        • Ranney LM
        • Richardson A
        • Goldstein AO.
        Impact of non-menthol flavours in tobacco products on perceptions and use among youth, young adults and adults: a systematic review.
        Tob Control. 2017; 26: 709-719https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053196
        • Thrasher JF
        • Brewer NT
        • Niederdeppe J
        • et al.
        Advancing tobacco product warning labels research methods and theory: a summary of a grantee meeting held by the U.S. National Cancer Institute.
        Nicotine Tob Res. 2019; 21: 855-862https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty017
        • Apaolaza V
        • Hartmann P
        • Echebarria C
        • Barrutia JM.
        Organic label's halo effect on sensory and hedonic experience of wine: a pilot study.
        J Sens Stud. 2017; 32: e12243https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12243
        • Kelly KJ
        • Edwards RW.
        Image advertisements for alcohol products: is their appeal associated with adolescents’ intention to consume alcohol?.
        Adolescence. 1998; 33: 47-59
        https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9583659/
        Date accessed: June 21, 2022
        • Wigg S
        • Stafford LD.
        Health warnings on alcoholic beverages: perceptions of the health risks and intentions towards alcohol consumption.
        PloS One. 2016; 11e0153027https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153027
        • Goodman S
        • Leos-Toro C
        • Hammond D.
        The impact of plain packaging and health warnings on consumer appeal of cannabis products.
        Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019; 205107633https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107633
        • Leos-Toro C
        • Fong GT
        • Meyer SB
        • Hammond D.
        Cannabis labelling and consumer understanding of THC levels and serving sizes.
        Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020; 208107843https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107843
        • Leos-Toro C
        • Fong GT
        • Hammond D.
        The efficacy of health warnings and package branding on perceptions of cannabis products among youth and young adults.
        Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021; 40: 637-646https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13240
      1. Pepper JK, Lee YO, Eggers ME, Allen JA, Thompson J, Nonnemaker JM. Perceptions of U.S. and Canadian cannabis package warnings among U.S. adults. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;217:108275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108275.

        • Leos-Toro C
        • Fong GT
        • Meyer SB
        • Hammond D.
        Perceptions of effectiveness and believability of pictorial and text-only health warning labels for cannabis products among Canadian youth.
        Int J Drug Policy. 2019; 73: 24-31https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.07.001
        • Aaker JL.
        Dimensions of brand personality.
        J Mark Res. 1997; 34: 347-356https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379703400304
        • Crilly N
        • Moultrie J
        • Clarkson PJ.
        Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design.
        Des Stud. 2004; 25: 547-577https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.03.001
        • Lee JGL
        • Averett PE
        • Blanchflower T
        • Gregory KR.
        Qualitative assessment of a Context of Consumption Framework to inform regulation of cigarette pack design in the U.S.
        Tob Induc dis. 2018; 16: 3https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/82925
        • Lee JGL
        • Blanchflower TM
        • O'Brien KF
        • Averett PE
        • Cofie LE
        • Gregory KR
        Evolving IQOS packaging designs change perceptions of product appeal, uniqueness, quality and safety: a randomised experiment, 2018, USA.
        Tob Control. 2019; 28: e52-e55https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054910
        • Brown J
        • Zhu M
        • Moran M
        • Hoe C
        • Frejas F
        • Cohen JE.
        You need to press on it’: young adults’ perceptions of flavoured cigarettes in the Philippines.
        Tob Control. 2021; 30: 293-298https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055524
        • Hall MG
        • Sheeran P
        • Noar SM
        • Ribisl KM
        • Boynton MH
        • Brewer NT.
        A brief measure of reactance to health warnings.
        J Behav Med. 2017; 40: 520-529https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-016-9821-z
      2. Wayman JC. Multiple imputation for missing data: what is it and how can I use it. In: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL; 2003:16. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.519.4667&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed June 21, 2022.

        • Hubbard R
        • Lindsay RM.
        Why p values are not a useful measure of evidence in statistical significance testing.
        Theor Psychol. 2008; 18: 69-88https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354307086923
        • Schenker N
        • Gentleman JF.
        On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals.
        Am Stat. 2001; 55: 182-186https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001317097960
        • Rothman KJ.
        No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons.
        Epidemiology. 1990; 1: 43-46https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199001000-00010
        • Gelman A
        • Hill J
        • Yajima M.
        Why we (usually) don't have to worry about multiple comparisons.
        J Res Educ Eff. 2012; 5: 189-211https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2011.618213
        • Wilson W.
        A note on the inconsistency inherent in the necessity to perform multiple comparisons.
        Psychol Bull. 1962; 59: 296-300https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040447
        • Giombi KC
        • Kosa KM
        • Rains C
        • Cates SC.
        Consumers’ perceptions of edible marijuana products for recreational use: likes, dislikes, and reasons for use.
        Subst Use Misuse. 2018; 53: 541-547https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2017.1343353
        • Doran N
        • Papadopoulos A
        Cannabis edibles: Behaviours, attitudes, and reasons for use.
        Environ Health Rev. 2019; 62: 44-52
        • Russell C
        • Rueda S
        • Room R
        • Tyndall M
        • Fischer B.
        Routes of administration for cannabis use–basic prevalence and related health outcomes: a scoping review and synthesis.
        Int J Drug Policy. 2018; 52: 87-96https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.11.008
        • Vandrey R
        • Herrmann ES
        • Mitchell JM
        • et al.
        Pharmacokinetic profile of oral cannabis in humans: blood and oral fluid disposition and relation to pharmacodynamic outcomes.
        J Anal Toxicol. 2017; 41: 83-99https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkx012
        • Bierut T
        • Krauss MJ
        • Sowles SJ
        • Cavazos-Rehg PA.
        Exploring marijuana advertising on Weedmaps, a popular online directory.
        Prev Sci. 2017; 18: 183-192https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0702-z
        • Jo CL
        • Noar SM
        • Southwell BG
        • Ribisl KM.
        Effects of e-cigarette advertising message form and cues on cessation intention: an exploratory study.
        J Health Commun. 2019; 24: 570-580https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1639857
        • Kosa KM
        • Giombi KC
        • Rains CB
        • Cates SC.
        Consumer use and understanding of labelling information on edible marijuana products sold for recreational use in the states of Colorado and Washington.
        Int J Drug Policy. 2017; 43: 57-66https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.01.006
        • Brewer NT
        • Morgan JC
        • Baig SA
        • et al.
        Public understanding of cigarette smoke constituents: three U.S. surveys.
        Tob Control. 2016; 26: 592-599https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052897
        • Jeong M
        • Zhang D
        • Morgan JC
        • et al.
        Similarities and differences in tobacco control research findings from convenience and probability samples.
        Ann Behav Med. 2019; 53: 476-485https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kay059