Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 64, ISSUE 4, P477-482, April 2023

Race-Based Care and Beliefs Regarding the Etiology of Racial Differences in Health Outcomes

Published:February 08, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2022.10.019

      Introduction

      Physicians’ perspectives regarding the etiology of racial health differences may be associated with their use of race in clinical practice (race-based practice). This study evaluates whether attributing racial differences in health to genetics, culture, or social conditions is associated with race-based practice.

      Methods

      This is a cross-sectional analysis, conducted in 2022, of the Council of Academic Family Medicine Education Research Alliance 2021 general membership survey. Only actively practicing U.S. physicians were included. The survey included demographic questions; the Racial Attributes in Clinical Evaluation (RACE) scale (higher scores imply greater race-based practice); and 3 questions regarding beliefs that racial differences in genetics, culture (e.g., health beliefs), or social conditions (e.g., education) explained racial differences in health. Three multivariable linear regressions were used to evaluate the relationship between RACE scores and beliefs regarding the etiology of racial differences in health.

      Results

      Of the 4,314 survey recipients, 949 (22%) responded, of whom 689 were actively practicing U.S. physicians. In multivariable regressions controlling for age, gender, race, ethnicity, and practice characteristics, a higher RACE score was associated with a greater belief that differences in genetics (β=3.57; 95% CI=3.19, 3.95) and culture (β=1.57; 95% CI=0.99, 2.16)—in but not social conditions—explained differences in health.

      Conclusions

      Physicians who believed that genetic or cultural differences between racial groups explained racial differences in health outcomes were more likely to use race in clinical care. Further research is needed to determine how race is differentially applied in clinical care on the basis of the belief in its genetic or cultural significance.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Price JH
        • Khubchandani J
        • McKinney M
        • Braun R.
        Racial/ethnic disparities in chronic diseases of youths and access to health care in the United States.
        Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013787616https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/787616
        • Goff Jr, DC
        • DM Lloyd-Jones
        The pooled cohort risk equations-Black risk matters.
        JAMA Cardiol. 2016; 1: 12-14https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2015.0323
        • Cerdeña JP
        • Asabor EN
        • Plaisime MV
        • Hardeman RR.
        Race-based medicine in the point-of-care clinical resource UpToDate: a systematic content analysis.
        EClinicalMedicine. 2022; 52101581https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101581
        • Fuentes A
        • Ackermann RR
        • Athreya S
        • et al.
        AAPA statement on race and racism.
        Am J Phys Anthropol. 2019; 169: 400-402https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23882
        • Schwartz RS.
        Racial profiling in medical research.
        N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 1392-1393https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200105033441810
        • Warshauer-Baker E
        • Bonham VL
        • Jenkins J
        • et al.
        Family physicians’ beliefs about genetic contributions to racial/ethnic and gender differences in health and clinical decision-making.
        Community Genet. 2008; 11: 352-358https://doi.org/10.1159/000133307
        • Sellers SL
        • Cunningham BA
        • Bonham VL.
        Physician knowledge of human genetic variation, beliefs about race and genetics, and use of race in clinical decision-making [published correction appears in J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019;6(3):647–648].
        J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019; 6: 110-116https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-018-0505-y
        • Delgado C
        • Baweja M
        • Crews DC
        • et al.
        A unifying approach for GFR estimation: recommendations of the NKF-ASN task force on reassessing the inclusion of race in diagnosing kidney disease.
        J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021; 32: 2994-3015https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2021070988
        • Cerdeña JP
        • Plaisime MV
        • Tsai J.
        From race-based to race-conscious medicine: how anti-racist uprisings call us to act.
        Lancet. 2020; 396: 1125-1128https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32076-6
        • Roberts DE.
        What's wrong with race-based medicine?: genes, drugs, and health disparities.
        Minn J Law Sci Techol. 2011; 12 (Accessed October 11, 2022.): 1-21
        • Amutah C
        • Greenidge K
        • Mante A
        • et al.
        Misrepresenting race - the role of medical schools in propagating physician bias.
        N Engl J Med. 2021; 384: 872-878https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMms2025768
      1. Race based medicine. AAFP. https://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/racebased-medicine.html. Accessed April 13, 2022.

        • American Academy of Pediatrics Board of Directors and Executive Committee
        AAP perspective: race-based medicine.
        Pediatrics. 2021; 148e2021053829https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-053829
        • Ways and Means Committee
        New ways and means report probes the misuse of race in clinical algorithms.
        Ways and Means Committee, Washington, DC2021 (Published October 14. Accessed April 13, 2022.)
        • Hunt LM
        • Truesdell ND
        • Kreiner MJ.
        Genes, race, and culture in clinical care: racial profiling in the management of chronic illness.
        Med Anthropol Q. 2013; 27: 253-271https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12026
        • Borrell LN
        • Elhawary JR
        • Fuentes-Afflick E
        • et al.
        Race and genetic ancestry in medicine – a time for reckoning with racism.
        N Engl J Med. 2021; 384: 474-480https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMms2029562
        • Bailey ZD
        • Krieger N
        • Agénor M
        • Graves J
        • Linos N
        • Bassett MT.
        Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions.
        Lancet. 2017; 389: 1453-1463https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30569-X
        • Ukoha EP
        • Snavely ME
        • Hahn MU
        • Steinauer JE
        • Bryant AS.
        Toward the elimination of race-based medicine: replace race with racism as preeclampsia risk factor.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 227: 593-596https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.048
      2. CAFM Educational Research Alliance (CERA). Society of Teachers of Family Medicine. https://www.stfm.org/Research/CERA. Accessed April 13, 2022.

        • Bonham VL
        • Sellers SL
        • Woolford S.
        Physicians’ knowledge, beliefs, and use of race and human genetic variation: new measures and insights.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14: 456https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-456
        • Cunningham BA
        • Bonham VL
        • Sellers SL
        • Yeh HC
        • Cooper LA.
        Physicians’ anxiety due to uncertainty and use of race in medical decision making.
        Med Care. 2014; 52: 728-733https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000157
        • Sellers SL
        • Moss ME
        • Calzone K
        • Abdallah KE
        • Jenkins JF
        • Bonham VL.
        Nurses’ use of race in clinical decision making.
        J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016; 48: 577-586https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12251
        • Abdallah KE
        • Calzone KA
        • Jenkins JF
        • Moss ME
        • Sellers SL
        • Bonham VL.
        A comparison of physicians’ and nurse practitioners’ use of race in clinical decision-making.
        Ethn Dis. 2019; 29: 1-8https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.29.1.1
      3. Bonham VL, Umeh NI, Cunningham BA, Abdallah KE, Sellers SL, Cooper LA. Primary care physicians’ collection, comfort, and use of race and ethnicity in clinical practice in the United States. Health Equity. 2017;1(1):118–126. https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2017.0015.

        • Okah E
        • Thomas J
        • Westby A
        • Cunningham B.
        Colorblind racial ideology and physician use of race in medical decision-making.
        J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022; 9: 2019-2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-021-01141-1
        • StataCorp
        Stata Statistical Software: Release 16.
        StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX2019
        • Bell HS
        • Odumosu F
        • Martinez-Hume AC
        • Howard HA
        • Hunt LM.
        Racialized risk in clinical care: clinician vigilance and patient responsibility.
        Med Anthropol. 2019; 38: 224-238https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2018.1476508
        • Snipes SA
        • Sellers SL
        • Tafawa AO
        • Cooper LA
        • Fields JC
        • Bonham VL.
        Is race medically relevant? A qualitative study of physicians’ attitudes about the role of race in treatment decision-making.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2011; 11: 183https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-183
        • Ashana DC
        • D'Arcangelo N
        • Gazarian PK
        • et al.
        Don't Talk to Them About Goals of Care”: understanding disparities in advance care planning.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022; 77: 339-346https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glab091
        • Vyas DA
        • Eisenstein LG
        • Jones DS.
        Hidden in plain sight - reconsidering the use of race correction in clinical algorithms.
        N Engl J Med. 2020; 383: 874-882https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMms2004740
        • The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        Counseling regarding approach to delivery after Cesarean and the use of a vaginal birth after Cesarean calculator.
        The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC2021 (Published December. Accessed October 11, 2022.)
        • Vyas DA
        • Jones DS
        • Meadows AR
        • Diouf K
        • Nour NM
        • Schantz-Dunn J.
        Challenging the use of race in the vaginal birth after Cesarean section calculator.
        Womens Health Issues. 2019; 29: 201-204https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2019.04.007
        • Xierali IM
        • Nivet MA
        • Gaglioti AH
        • Liaw WR
        • Bazemore AW.
        Increasing family medicine faculty diversity still lags population trends.
        J Am Board Fam Med. 2017; 30: 100-103https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2017.01.160211
        • American Medical Association
        New AMA policies recognize race as a social, not biological, construct.
        American Medical Association, Chicago, IL2020 (Published November 16. Accessed May 30, 2022.)
        • Fisher-Borne M
        • Cain JM
        • Martin SL.
        From mastery to accountability: cultural humility as an alternative to cultural competence.
        Soc Work Educ. 2015; 34: 165-181https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2014.977244
        • Tervalon M
        • Murray-García J.
        Cultural humility versus cultural competence: a critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education.
        J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1998; 9: 117-125https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2010.0233