Advertisement

Smoke-Free Policies and Resident Turnover: An Evaluation in Massachusetts Public Housing From 2009‒2018

Published:January 10, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2022.10.020

      Introduction

      Smoke-free policies (SFP) in multi-unit housing are a promising tool for reducing exposure to tobacco smoke among residents. Concerns about increased housing instability due to voluntary or involuntary transitions induced by SFPs have been a primary barrier to greater widespread adoption. The impact of SFP implementation on transitions out of public housing in federally funded public housing authorities in Massachusetts was evaluated.

      Methods

      Tenancy data from the Department of Housing and Urban Development were used to determine the time from admission to transitioning out of public housing based on a cohort study design. Periods of exposure to SFPs were defined based on dates of SFP implementation at each PHA. Multi-level Cox regression models were fit to estimate the effects of SFPs on the hazard of transitioning, adjusting for household- and PHA-level characteristics. Analyses were conducted in 2021‒2022.

      Results

      There were 44,705 households with a record of residence in Massachusetts PHAs over 2009‒2018. Over this period, despite increasing adoption of SFPs among the PHAs, rates of transition remained steady at around 5‒8 transitions per 1,000 household-months. There was no overall association between exposure to SFPs and transitions among the full sample (adjusted HR=0.99, 95% CI=0.95, 1.04, p=0.794). However, the association varied significantly by age group, race/ethnicity, timing of SFP adoption, and era of admission.

      Conclusions

      Adoption of SFPs in public housing had a minimal overall impact on turnover for households in Massachusetts, though disparities in the impact were observed between different demographic and PHA-level subgroups.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

      1. Health US Department, Services Human, others. The Health Consequences of Smoking-50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. 2014.

        • Andrew Hyland
        • Joaquin Barnoya
        • E Corral Juan
        Smoke-free air policies: past, present and future.
        Tob Control. 2012; 21: 154-161https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050389
        • D Blake Kelly
        • L Klein Amanda
        • Laura Walpert
        • et al.
        Smoke-free and tobacco-free colleges and universities in the United States.
        Tob Control. 2020; 29: 289-294
        • M Kennedy Sara
        • P Davis Shane
        • L Thorne Stacy
        Smoke-free policies in US Prisons and jails: A review of the literature.
        Nicotine Tob Res. 2014; 17: 629-635https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu225
        • C Digenis-Bury Eleni
        • R Brooks Daniel
        • Leslie Chen
        • Mary Ostrem
        • Robert Horsburgh C
        Use of a population-based survey to describe the health of Boston public housing residents.
        Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 85-91https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.094912
        • E Helms Veronica
        • A King Brian
        • J Ashley Peter
        Cigarette smoking and adverse health outcomes among adults receiving federal housing assistance.
        Prev Med. 2017; 99: 171-177https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.02.001
        • H Stein Anna
        • E Baker Laura
        • P Agans Robert
        • Wei Xue
        • M Collins Nina
        • L Suttie Janet
        The experience with smoke-free policies in affordable multiunit housing in North Carolina: a statewide survey.
        Am J Health Promot. 2016; 30: 382-389https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117116646346
      2. HUD. Instituting smoke-free public housing. Proposed Rule 24 CFR Parts 965 and 966. 2015.

        • K Burdette Linda
        • C Rowe Gina
        • Laurie Johansen
        • et al.
        A statewide assessment of smoke-free policy in multiunit housing settings.
        Nicotine Tob Res. 2014; 16: 1593-1598https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu114
        • L Jackson Shelly
        • J Bonnie Richard
        A systematic examination of smoke-free policies in multiunit dwellings in Virginia as reported by property managers: implications for prevention.
        Am J Health Promot. 2011; 26: 37-44https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.091005-QUAN-329
        • A King Brian
        • J Travers Mark
        • Michael Cummings K
        • C Mahoney Martin
        • J Hyland Andrew
        Prevalence and predictors of smoke-free policy implementation and support among owners and managers of multiunit housing.
        Nicotine Tob Res. 2010; 12: 159-163https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntp175
        • J Hewett Martha
        • D Sandell Sandra
        • John Anderson
        • Marsha Niebuhr
        Secondhand smoke in apartment buildings: renter and owner or manager perspectives.
        Nicotine Tob Res. 2007; 9: S39-S47https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200601083442
        • Nan Jiang
        • Lorna Thorpe
        • Sue Kaplan
        • Donna Shelley
        Perceptions about the federally mandated smoke-free housing policy among residents living in public housing in New York City.
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15: 2062https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102062
        • Tsai Alexander C.
        Home foreclosure, health, and mental health: a systematic review of individual, aggregate, and contextual associations.
        PloS One. 2015; 10e0123182https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123182
        • A Pizacani Barbara
        • E Maher Julie
        • Kristen Rohde
        • Linda Drach
        • J Stark Michael
        Implementation of a smoke-free policy in subsidized multiunit housing: effects on smoking cessation and secondhand smoke exposure.
        Nicotine Tob Res. 2012; 14: 1027-1034https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntr334
        • M Farley Shannon
        • Needham Waddell Elizabeth
        • H Coady Micaela
        • et al.
        Correlates of smoke-free housing policies and interest in implementing policies among multiunit housing owners in New York City.
        J Urban Health. 2015; 92: 291-303https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9934-z
        • Kegler Michelle C
        • Erin Lebow-Skelley
        • Jaimie Lea
        • et al.
        A qualitative study of the process of adoption, implementation and enforcement of smoke-free policies in privately owned affordable housing.
        BMC Public Health. 2019; 19: 1071https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7404-y
        • Kimberly Snyder
        • Vick Janice
        • Hassett King
        • Brian A.
        Smoke-free multiunit housing: a review of the scientific literature.
        Tob Control. 2016; 25: 9-20
        • E Levy Douglas
        • F Adams Inez
        • Gary Adamkiewicz
        Delivering on the promise of smokefree public housing.
        Am J Public Health. 2017; 107: 380-383https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303606
        • C Lloyd Patricia
        Helms Veronica E. NCHS-HUD linked data: analytic considerations and guidelines National Center for Health Statistics.
        Office of Analysis and Epidemiology. 2016;
      3. Hopkins M. Tobacco Control Laws Database: A Tool for Researchers American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation- no-smoke. org. 2018.

      4. Klein John P, Moeschberger Melvin L. Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data. Springer 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/b97377.

      5. State & Federal Public Housing. Units Per Local Housing Authority, By Program. https://www.mass.gov/doc/local-housing-authority-unit-counts-by-program-listing/download.

      6. Special Commission on Rural Access and Improving State-Sponsored Services in Massachusetts Rural Communities. Report to the Great and General Court and Executive Office of the Governor. https://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/625657. Published 2013.

        • Kurt Ulm
        A simple method to calculate the confidence interval of a standardized mortality ratio (SMR).
        Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 131: 373-375https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115507
        • W Ambrose Brent
        A hazard rate analysis of leavers and stayers in assisted housing programs.
        Cityscape. 2005; 8: 69-93
        • Thompson Dianne T.
        Evaluating length of stay in assisted housing programs: A methodological note.
        Cityscape. 2007; 9: 217-238
        • L Hungerford Thomas
        The dynamics of housing assistance spells.
        J Urban Econ. 1996; 39: 193-208https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.0010
        • L Korn Edward
        • I Graubard Barry
        • Douglas Midthune
        Time-to-event analysis of longitudinal follow-up of a survey: choice of the time-scale.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1997; 145: 72-80https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009034
        • C Austin Peter
        A tutorial on multilevel survival analysis: methods, models and applications.
        Int Stat Rev. 2017; 85: 185-203https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12214
      7. Therneau Terry M. Mixed Effects Cox Models [R package coxme version 2.2-16] 2020.

        • J Rothman Kenneth
        • Sander Greenland
        Lash Timothy L, others. Modern Epidemiology.
        3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008
      8. Hern'andez Diana, Swope Carolyn B, Azuogu Cindi, Siegel Eva, Giovenco Daniel P. 'If I pay rent, I'm gonna smoke': insights on the social contract of smokefree housing policy in affordable housing settings. Health Place. 2019;56:106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.01.007.

        • A Wray Jasilyn
        • E Sheehan Brynn
        • W Rees Vaughan
        • Diane Cooper
        • Emma Morgan
        Plunk Andrew D. A qualitative study of unfairness and distrust in smoke-free housing.
        Am J Health Behav. 2021; 45: 798-809https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.45.5.1
        • E Thorpe Lorna
        • Elle Anastasiou
        • Katarzyna Wyka
        • et al.
        Evaluation of secondhand smoke exposure in New York City public housing after implementation of the 2018 federal smoke-free housing policy.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3e2024385https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24385
        • D Plunk Andrew
        • W Rees Vaughan
        • Anna Jeng
        • A Wray Jasilyn
        • A Grucza Richard
        Increases in secondhand smoke after going smoke-free: an assessment of the impact of a mandated smoke-free housing policy.
        Nicotine Tob Res. 2020; 22: 2254-2256https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa040
        • Elle Anastasiou
        • Terry Gordon
        • Katarzyna Wyka
        • et al.
        Long-term Trends in secondhand smoke exposure in high-rise housing serving low-income residents in New York City: Three-Year Evaluation of a federal smoking ban in public housing.
        Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; : 2018-2021https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntac202
        • Kirk McClure
        Length of stay in assisted housing.
        Cityscape. 2018; 20: 11-38
        • Karen Messer
        • R Trinidad Dennis
        • K Al-Delaimy Wael
        • P Pierce John
        Smoking cessation rates in the United States: a comparison of young adult and older smokers.
        Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 317-322https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.112060
        • E Cornelius Monica
        • W Wang Teresa
        • Ahmed Jamal
        • G Loretan Caitlin
        • J Neff Linda
        Tobacco product use among adults-United States.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 69 (2019): 1736-1742https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6946a4