Advertisement

Firearm Laws Enacted by Municipalities in 6 States With Diverse Policy Frameworks

Published:January 06, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2022.11.005

      Introduction

      Firearm violence is a public health crisis. Municipalities are frequently prevented from adopting firearm-related laws because of state preemption―when the state limits local authority to enact laws on a specific topic. Yet, it is unknown the extent to which municipalities enact firearm-related laws under varying preemption regimes, the content of such laws, and how municipal laws relate to the state's firearm-policy framework.

      Methods

      A purposeful sample of 6 states with diverse preemption laws were chosen; 3 with robust preemption: South Carolina, Maryland, and Arizona; 1 with moderate preemption: Nebraska; and 2 without preemption: Connecticut and New York. Using Lexis+, municipal codes as of December 31, 2020 were identified, and the policy topics were evaluated and compared with the state's policy framework. Counties representing the municipalities identified were characterized using public use data.

      Results

      In total, 613 municipal policies were identified, covering 56 topics. The number of policy topics enacted by at least 1 municipality in the state included 18 for Arizona, 21 for Connecticut, 24 for Maryland, 25 for Nebraska, 40 for New York, and 28 for South Carolina. The most common policy identified was restricting public discharge in community-centered locations. Local laws in preemption states replicated state requirements or were consistent with savings clauses expressly allowing local action. New York City, a municipality in a state without preemption, enacted laws covering the most policy topics of the municipalities identified.

      Conclusions

      When not constrained by state preemption, local lawmakers actively passed firearm-related legislation. Many such laws are specific to local contexts and may reflect local lawmakers’ responsiveness to constituent concerns.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Solnick SJ
        • Hemenway D.
        Unintentional firearm deaths in the United States 2005–2015.
        Inj Epidemiol. 2019; 6: 42https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-019-0220-0
        • Gramlich J.
        What the data says about gun deaths in the U.S.
        Pew Research Center, Washington, DC, 2022 (Published February 3, 2022. Accessed September 3, 2022)
      1. Multiple cause of death 1999–2020, CDC WONDER online database. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022, National Center for Health Statistics https://wonder.cdc.gov/, Accessed September 23, 2022.

      2. N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022).

        • Donohue JJ.
        The Supreme Court’s gun decision will lead to more violent crime.
        The Washington Post. July 8, 2022; (Accessed September 3, 2022)
      3. Gun violence prevention ordinances. Boulder County. https://bouldercolorado.gov/gun-violence-prevention-ordinances. Accessed September 3, 2022.

      4. Preemption of local laws. Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. https://giffords.org/lawcenter/gun-laws/policy-areas/other-laws-policies/preemption-of-local-laws/. Accessed September 3, 2022.

        • Pomeranz JL
        • Silver D
        • Lieff SA.
        State gun-control, gun-rights, and preemptive firearm-related laws across 50 U.S. states for 2009–2018.
        Am J Public Health. 2021; 111: 1273-1280https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306287
      5. Bischof B. LPD hands out 15 tickets for violating new gun storage ordinance in 2020. 1011 Now. February 13, 2021.https://www.1011now.com/2021/02/13/lpd-hands-out-15-tickets-for-violating-new-gun-storage-ordinance-in-2020/. Accessed September 3, 2022.

        • Sanner L
        • Grant S
        • Walter-McCabe H
        • Silverman RD.
        The challenges of conducting intrastate policy surveillance: a methods note on county and city laws in Indiana.
        Am J Public Health. 2021; 111: 1095-1098https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306227
      6. Rand State Firearm Law Database Version 3.0; 2020, RAND Corporation; Santa Monica, CA https://www.rand.org/pubs/tools/TLA243-2-v2.html, Published September 2020. Accessed September 25, 2022.

        • Cherney S
        • Morral AR
        • Schell TL
        • Smucker S.
        Development of the rand state firearm law database and supporting materials.
        RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA2020 (Accessed September 3, 2022)
      7. State firearm laws, 2022, Boston University. https://www.statefirearmlaws.org/resources, Accessed November 3, 2022.

      8. 2020 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. U.S. Census. http://www.census.gov/. Accessed September 23, 2022.

        • U.S. Census Bureau
        Urban and rural definitions.
        U.S. Census Bureau, Suitland-Silver Hill, MD1995 (Published October 1995. Accessed September 23, 2022)
      9. Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates Program. U.S. Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/about/policies/quality/corrections/saipe.html. Updated October 8, 2021. Accessed September 23, 2022.

      10. 2022 Measures. County Health Rankings & Roadmaps.
        University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, 2022 (Accessed September 23, 2022)
        • United States Bureau of Labor Statistics
        Labor force data by county, not seasonally adjusted.
        U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2020 (Accessed September 23, 2022)
        • Degli Esposti M
        • Gravel J
        • Kaufman EJ
        • Delgado MK
        • Richmond TS
        • Wiebe DJ
        County-level variation in changes in firearm mortality rates across the US, 1989 to 1993 vs 2015 to 2019.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5e2215557https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15557
      11. Mortality files, 2016–2020, 2022, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention https://wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10.html. Accessed September 23, 2022.

      12. Code Ann SC. § 16-23-420.

      13. Williamston, South Carolina Code of Ordinances § 58–126.

      14. Code Ann SC. § 23-31-520.

      15. Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. § 4-209.

      16. 76 Op. Att'y Gen, 240, Maryland; 1991.

      17. A.R.S. § 13-3108.

      18. Neb RRS. § 14-102.

      19. Neb RRS. § 17-556.

        • WIS News 10 Staff.
        S.C. attorney general files lawsuit against City of Columbia over gun laws.
        WIS News. January 29, 2020; (Accessed September 3, 2022)
        • South Carolina Attorney General’s Office
        SC Attorney General Wilson wins lawsuit against the City of Columbia over city gun laws.
        South Carolina Attorney General’s Office, Columbia, SC2021 (Published May 4, 2021. Accessed September 3, 2022)
        • Subbaraman N.
        United States to fund gun-violence research after 20-year freeze.
        Nature. 577. 2020: 12https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03882-w
      20. What science tells us about the effects of gun policies.
        RAND Corporation, 2020 (Updated April 22, 2022. Accessed September 3, 2022)
      21. City council unanimously passes six gun violence prevention measures.
        City of Boulder. June 8, 2022; (Accessed September 3, 2022)