Research Article|Articles in Press

In-Store Marketing and Supermarket Purchases: Associations Overall and by Transaction SNAP Status


      In-store placement promotions are used widely in supermarkets, but their effects on customer purchases remain largely unknown. This study examined associations of supermarket placement promotions with customer purchases overall and by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefit use.


      Data on in-store promotions (e.g., endcaps, checkout displays) and transactions (n=274,118,338) were obtained from a New England supermarket chain with 179 stores from 2016 to 2017. Product-level analyses examined multivariable-adjusted changes in products’ sales when they were promoted (versus not) across all transactions and stratified by whether the transaction was paid for with SNAP benefits.Food group−level analyses examined the extent to which a 20% increase from the mean number of weekly promotions for a food group (e.g., increasing the number of candy promotions from 17.0 to 20.4) was associated with total food group sales. Analyses were conducted in 2022.


      Across stores, the mean (SD) number of promotions per week was highest for sweet/salty snacks (126.3 [22.6]), baked goods (67.5 [18.4]), and sugar-sweetened beverages (48.6 [13.8]) and lowest for beans (5.0 [2.6]) and fruits (6.6 [3.3]). Product sales were between 16% (low-calorie drinks) and 136% (candy) higher when promoted versus not promoted. In 14 of 15 food groups, associations were stronger among transactions made with SNAP benefits than among those not made with SNAP benefits. The number of in-store promotions was generally not associated with total food group sales.


      In-store promotions, which were mostly for unhealthy foods, were associated with large product sales increases, particularly among SNAP purchasers. Policies limiting unhealthy in-store promotions and incentivizing healthy promotions should be explored.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. World Health Organization. Food marketing exposure and power and their associations with food-related attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours: a narrative review. Published February 7, 2022. Accessed February 24, 2023.

        • Boyland EJ
        • Nolan S
        • Kelly B
        • et al.
        Advertising as a cue to consume: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of acute exposure to unhealthy food and nonalcoholic beverage advertising on intake in children and adults.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2016; 103: 519-533
        • Smith R
        • Kelly B
        • Yeatman H
        • Boyland E.
        Food marketing influences children's attitudes, preferences and consumption: a systematic critical review.
        Nutrients. 2019; 11: E875
        • Sadeghirad B
        • Duhaney T
        • Motaghipisheh S
        • Campbell NRC
        • Johnston BC.
        Influence of unhealthy food and beverage marketing on children's dietary intake and preference: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
        Obes Rev. 2016; 17: 945-959
        • Jenkin G
        • Madhvani N
        • Signal L
        • Bowers S.
        A systematic review of persuasive marketing techniques to promote food to children on television.
        Obes Rev. 2014; 15: 281-293
        • Hansen KL
        • Golubovic S
        • Eriksen CU
        • Jørgensen T
        • Toft U.
        Effectiveness of food environment policies in improving population diets: a review of systematic reviews.
        Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022; 76: 637-646
        • Jahns L
        • Scheett AJ
        • Johnson LK
        • et al.
        Diet quality of items advertised in supermarket sales circulars compared to diets of the US population, as assessed by the Healthy Eating Index-2010.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016; 116 (115–122.e1)
        • Ravensbergen EAH
        • Waterlander WE
        • Kroeze W
        • Steenhuis IHM.
        Healthy or unhealthy on sale? A cross-sectional study on the proportion of healthy and unhealthy foods promoted through flyer advertising by supermarkets in the Netherlands.
        BMC Public Health. 2015; 15: 470
        • Samuel L
        • Basch CH
        • Ethan D
        • Hammond R
        • Chiazzese K.
        An analysis of sodium, total fat and saturated fat contents of packaged food products advertised in Bronx-based supermarket circulars.
        J Community Health. 2014; 39: 775-782
        • Powell LM
        • Kumanyika SK
        • Isgor Z
        • Rimkus L
        • Zenk SN
        • Chaloupka FJ.
        Price promotions for food and beverage products in a nationwide sample of food stores.
        Prev Med. 2016; 86: 106-113
        • Schultz S
        • Cameron AJ
        • Grigsby-Duffy L
        • et al.
        Availability and placement of healthy and discretionary food in Australian supermarkets by chain and level of socio-economic disadvantage.
        Public Health Nutr. 2021; 24: 203-214
        • Grigsby-Duffy L
        • Schultz S
        • Orellana L
        • et al.
        The healthiness of food and beverages on price promotion at promotional displays: a cross-sectional audit of Australian supermarkets.
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17: 9026
        • United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service
        FoodAPS National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey: Summary Findings.
        2019 (Accessed August 19, 2022)
      2. Rivlin G. Rigged: supermarket shelves for sale. Published online 2016. Accessed January 26, 2023.

        • Nakamura R
        • Pechey R
        • Suhrcke M
        • Jebb SA
        • Marteau TM.
        Sales impact of displaying alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages in end-of-aisle locations: an observational study.
        Soc Sci Med. 2014; 108: 68-73
        • Chevalier M.
        Increase in sales due to in-store display.
        J Mark Res. 1975; 12: 426-431
        • Tan PJ
        • Corsi A
        • Cohen J
        • et al.
        Assessing the sales effectiveness of differently located endcaps in a supermarket.
        J Retailing Con Serv. 2018; 43: 200-208
        • Inman JJ
        • Winer RS
        • Ferraro R.
        The interplay among category characteristics, customer characteristics, and customer activities on in-store decision making.
        J Mark. 2009; 73: 19-29
        • Kacen JJ
        • Hess JD
        • Walker D.
        Spontaneous selection: the influence of product and retailing factors on consumer impulse purchases.
        J Retailing Con Serv. 2012; 19: 578-588
        • Shafir E
        • Mullainathan S.
        Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means so Much.
        Times Books, 2013
        • Devine CM
        • Jastran M
        • Jabs J
        • Wethington E
        • Farell TJ
        • Bisogni CA.
        A lot of sacrifices:” work-family spillover and the food choice coping strategies of low-wage employed parents.
        Soc Sci Med. 2006; 63: 2591-2603
        • Moran AJ
        • Musicus A
        • Gorski Findling MT
        • et al.
        Increases in sugary drink marketing during supplemental nutrition assistance program benefit issuance in New York.
        Am J Prev Med. 2018; 55: 55-62
        • Kolb H
        • Martin S.
        Environmental/lifestyle factors in the pathogenesis and prevention of type 2 diabetes.
        BMC Med. 2017; 15: 131
        • Schultz WM
        • Kelli HM
        • Lisko JC
        • et al.
        Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular outcomes: challenges and interventions.
        Circulation. 2018; 137: 2166-2178
        • Darmon N
        • Drewnowski A.
        Does social class predict diet quality?.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2008; 87: 1107-1117
      3. Guiding Stars: Nutritious Choices Made Simple; Published 2021. Accessed November 10, 2021.

        • Fischer LM
        • Sutherland LA
        • Kaley LA
        • et al.
        Development and implementation of the guiding stars nutrition guidance program.
        Am J Health Promot. 2011; 26: e55-e63
        • Franckle RL
        • Moran A
        • Hou T
        • et al.
        Transactions at a Northeastern Supermarket Chain: Differences by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Use.
        Am J Prev Med. 2017; 53: e131-e138
        • Fielding-Singh P.
        A taste of inequality: food's symbolic value across the socioeconomic spectrum.
        SocScience. 2017; 4: 424-448
      4. Nielsen. The path to efficient trade promotions. Published online 2015. Accessed January 26, 2023.

      5. Muller F. Ahold Delhaize pledges under the second component of the EU Code of Conduct for Responsible Business and Marketing practices. Published online 2021. Accessed January 7, 2023.

      6. Center for Science in the Public Interest. Healthier checkout lanes coming to Aldi supermarkets. Published online 2016. Accessed January 7, 2023.

        • Nakamura R
        • Suhrcke M
        • Jebb SA
        • Pechey R
        • Almiron-Roig E
        • Marteau TM.
        Erratum for Nakamura et al. Price promotions on healthier compared with less healthy foods: a hierarchical regression analysis of the impact on sales and social patterning of responses to promotions in Great Britain. Am J Clin Nutr 2015;101:808-16.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2015; 102: 980
        • Piernas C
        • Harmer G
        • Jebb SA.
        Removing seasonal confectionery from prominent store locations and purchasing behaviour within a major UK supermarket: evaluation of a nonrandomised controlled intervention study.
        PLOS Med. 2022; 19e1003951
        • Ejlerskov KT
        • Sharp SJ
        • Stead M
        • Adamson AJ
        • White M
        • Adams J.
        Supermarket policies on less-healthy food at checkouts: natural experimental evaluation using interrupted time series analyses of purchases.
        PLOS Med. 2018; 15e1002712
        • Walmsley R
        • Jenkinson D
        • Saunders I
        • Howard T
        • Oyebode O.
        Choice architecture modifies fruit and vegetable purchasing in a university campus grocery store: time series modelling of a natural experiment.
        BMC Public Health. 2018; 18: 1149
        • Caspi CE
        • Lenk K
        • Pelletier JE
        • et al.
        Association between store food environment and customer purchases in small grocery stores, gas-marts, pharmacies and dollar stores.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017; 14: 76
        • Thorndike AN
        • Bright OM
        • Dimond MA
        • Fishman R
        • Levy DE.
        Choice architecture to promote fruit and vegetable purchases by families participating in the Special Supplemental Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC): randomized corner store pilot study.
        Public Health Nutr. 2017; 20: 1297-1305
        • Stuber JM
        • Lakerveld J
        • Kievitsbosch LW
        • Mackenbach JD
        • Beulens JWJ.
        Nudging customers towards healthier food and beverage purchases in a real-life online supermarket: a multi-arm randomized controlled trial.
        BMC Med. 2022; 20: 10
        • Shaw SC
        • Ntani G
        • Baird J
        • Vogel CA.
        A systematic review of the influences of food store product placement on dietary-related outcomes.
        Nutr Rev. 2020; 78: 1030-1045
        • Thorndike AN
        • Sunstein CR.
        Obesity prevention in the supermarket-choice architecture and the supplemental nutrition assistance program.
        Am J Public Health. 2017; 107: 1582-1583
        • Gómez-Donoso C
        • Sacks G
        • Vanderlee L
        • et al.
        Public support for healthy supermarket initiatives focused on product placement: a multi-country cross-sectional analysis of the 2018 International Food Policy Study.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021; 18: 78
        • Petrescu DC
        • Hollands GJ
        • Couturier DL
        • Ng YL
        • Marteau TM.
        Public acceptability in the UK and USA of nudging to reduce obesity: the example of reducing sugar-sweetened beverages consumption.
        PLOS ONE. 2016; 11e0155995
      7. City of Berkeley Ordinance No. 7,734-N.S. Adding Chapter 9.82 to The Berkeley Municipal Code “Healthy Checkout.” Accessed February 20, 2023.

      8. Justia. U.S. Supreme Court. Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525. Published 2001. Accessed February 24, 2023.

        • Franckle RL
        • Thorndike AN
        • Moran AJ
        • et al.
        Supermarket purchases over the supplemental nutrition assistance program benefit month: a comparison between participants and nonparticipants.
        Am J Prev Med. 2019; 57: 800-807