Research Article| Volume 18, ISSUE 3, P219-224, April 2000

Download started.


Clinician satisfaction with a preventive services implementation trial

The IMPROVE project


      Object: To discover how attempts to increase the delivery of preventive services affect clinician satisfaction.
      Methods: The IMPROVE project was a randomized clinical trial conducted in 44 clinics in and around Minneapolis–St. Paul, Minnesota. Personnel were trained in continuous quality improvement techniques to organize preventive services delivery systems. Satisfaction with delivery of these services and with the sponsoring organizations was measured before the intervention (Time 1), at the end of the intervention (Time 2), and 1 year post-intervention (Time 3).
      Results: At no time was the intervention associated with a change in the respondents satisfaction with their places of work or with their job roles. Satisfaction with preventive services delivery increased from Time 1 to Time 3 among intervention-clinic respondents. Satisfaction with the IMPROVE project and the efforts of the two managed care organizations to help the clinics deliver preventive services peaked at Time 2 and declined toward baseline at Time 3. Satisfaction with preventive services delivery tended to increase more in the 13 intervention clinics that implemented a preventive services delivery system than in the nine intervention clinics that did not implement a preventive services delivery system (p = 0.15).
      Conclusions: Planned organizational change to create systems for preventive services delivery can be associated with increased clinician satisfaction with the way these services are delivered. However, increased satisfaction with preventive services does not necessarily indicate that service delivery rates have increased.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Solberg L.I
        • Kottke T.E
        • Brekke M.L
        • Calomeni C.A
        • Conn S.A
        • Davidson G
        Using continuous quality improvement to increase preventive services in clinical practice—going beyond guidelines.
        Prev Med. 1996; 25: 259-267
        • Solberg L.I
        • Brekke M.L
        • Kottke T.E
        How important are clinician and nurse attitudes to the delivery of clinical preventive services?.
        J Fam Pract. 1997; 44: 451-461
        • Kottke T.E
        • Solberg L.I
        • Brekke M.L
        • Cabrera A
        • Marquez M
        Delivery rates for preventive services in 44 Mid-Western clinics.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 1997; 72: 515-523
        • Solberg L.I
        • Kottke T.E
        • Brekke M.L
        • Conn S.A
        • Magnan S
        • Amundson G
        The case of the missing clinical preventive services system.
        Eff Clin Pract. 1998; 1: 33-38
        • Solberg L.I
        • Kottke T.E
        • Brekke M.L
        Will primary care clinics organize themselves to improve the delivery of preventive services? A randomized controlled trial.
        Prev Med. 1998; 27: 623-631
      1. Solberg LI, Kottke TE, Brekke ML, et al. Effects of a continuous quality improvement intervention to create systems for the delivery of clinical preventive services. Eff Clin Pract, accepted for publication.

        • Whorley L.W
        Job satisfaction among substance abuse prevention personnel.
        J Addict Dis. 1992; 11: 81-90